System Performance

One of the more popular and pervasive beliefs in this industry is that specs increasingly don’t matter. In a lot of ways, this review isn’t really the right place to address whether or not this matters, but the short answer is that things like SoC performance matter quite a bit. Outside of the display, the SoC and RF subsystems are one of the biggest power consumers in a phone today and unlike the display or RF systems the CPU and GPU can cause short spikes of enormous power consumption. At this point, we’ve seen SoCs this year that consume anywhere between 6 to over 12 watts when faced with a full load situation. The important part here is that when an SoC uses that much power, it needs to be delivering enough performance to justify the power consumption. In order to test aspects of the phone like the SoC we use our standard suite of benchmarks, which are designed to test various real-world scenarios to get an idea of what peak performance looks like.

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2013 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2015 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

In the standard web browser benchmarks, the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus are clearly in the lead. The difference in some cases is significant, but given that the benchmarks that we’re running here are all enormous optimization targets it's still a reasonable comparison point. In the interest of trying to avoid optimization targets I decided to look at some new JavaScript benchmarks that aren’t regularly used right now. One interesting benchmark is Ember Performance, which is a JavaScript app framework that is used in a number of popular websites and applications. This isn’t as popular as AngularJS at the moment, but in the absence of a good mobile benchmark EmberJS should be a reasonably good proxy.

EmberJS (Chrome/Safari/IE)

In this benchmark, we can see that there’s a pretty enormous performance uplift that results when you compare the iPhone 6s' to anything else out there on the market. Weirdly enough, on average it looks like Samsung’s S-Browser ends up slower here than Chrome, but it’s likely that this is just because S-Browser is using an older build of Chromium which negates the advantages of platform-specific optimizations that Samsung is integrating into S-Browser.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Overall

Basemark OS II 2.0 - System

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Memory

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Graphics

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Web

Looking at Basemark OS II, once again Apple is basically taking the lead across the board. The differences aren’t necessarily as enormous as they are in single-threaded browser benchmarks, but the iPhone 6s’ retain a significant overall performance lead over the next best mobile devices.

Overall, in benchmarks where CPU performance is a significant influence the iPhone 6s is pretty much at the very top of the stack. Of course, Apple has also had about 6-8 months of time since the launch of SoCs like the Snapdragon 810 and Exynos 7420 so this is at least partially to be expected. The real surprise and/or disappointment would be if future Exynos and Snapdragon SoCs continue to lag behind the A9 in CPU performance.

A9's GPU: Imagination PowerVR GT7600 System Performance Cont'd and NAND Performance
POST A COMMENT

532 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shadow7037932 - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    Finally! Now how about the Nexus and Moto X reviews? :P Reply
  • RazrLeaf - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    I'm hoping that they get those out before the Black Friday. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    How about the new 950/950XL? ;-) Reply
  • zeeBomb - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    Im pretty sure that'll be somewhere in December. Reply
  • abhaxus - Tuesday, November 3, 2015 - link

    of 2016?

    By that time the ads will completely take over your phone screen instead of being just a tiny scrolling one that takes up 1/3 of the screen.

    RIP Anandtech.
    Reply
  • ezridah - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    It doesn't look like they'll do a Nexus 6P review because they're weren't provided a sample. Very disappointing to say the least... Reply
  • tuxRoller - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    Which is a shame, considering the amazing reviews its been getting, and it seems that at least someone has produced a really excellent experience with the snapdragon 810! Reply
  • amdwilliam1985 - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    I will love to see the 6P review from Anandtech as well. I've read every popular reviews out there on 5X and 6P, on websites and youtubes. I've decided to go for the 64GB 6P, but I would still love to see Anandtech's take on 6P, especially comparing to Nexus 5(that's where I'm coming from) and Nexus 6. Reply
  • djsvetljo - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    I admit, I only read the "Final Words" page and it felt like Russian propaganda before 1990. I respect Anandtech for its highly techy and geeky reviews and tests but I am now 100% convinced that anything Apple related is paid (IMO). There aren't many reviews out there that dare to "the best..." instead of "one of the best...". Reply
  • djsvetljo - Monday, November 2, 2015 - link

    "The best" was used 7 times in the summary. :D Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now