IPC Increases: Double L1 Data Cache, Better Branch Prediction

One of the biggest changes in the design is the increase in the L1 data cache, doubling its size from 64 KB to 128 KB while keeping the same efficiency. This is combined with a better prefetch pipeline and branch prediction to reduce the level of cache misses in the design. The L1 data cache is also now an 8-way associative design, but with the better branch prediction when needed it will only activate the one segment required and when possible power down the rest.  This includes removing extra data from 64-bit word constructions. This reduces power consumption by up to 2x, along with better clock gating and minor adjustments. It is worth pointing out that doubling the L1 cache is not always easy – it needs to be close to the branch predictors and prefetch buffers in order to be effective, but it also requires space. By using the high density libraries this was achieved, as well as prioritizing lower level cache. Another element is the latency, which normally has to be increased when a cache increases in size, although AMD did not elaborate into how this was performed.

As listed above, the branch prediction benefits come about through a 50% increase in the BTB size. This allows the buffer to store more historic records of previous interactions, increasing the likelihood of a prefetch if similar work is in motion. If this requires floating point data, the FP port can initiate a quicker flush required to loop data back into the next command. Support for new instructions is not new, though AVX2 is something a number of high end software packages will be interested in using in the future.

These changes, according to AMD, relate to a 4-15% higher IPC for Excavator in Carrizo compared to Steamroller in Kaveri.  This is perhaps a little more what we normally would expect from a generational increase (4-8% is more normal), but AMD likes to stress that this comes in addition to lower power consumption and with a reduced die area. As a result, at the same power Carrizo can have both an IPC advantage and a frequency advantage.

As a result, AMD states that for the same power, Cinebench single threaded results will go up 40% and multithreaded results up 55%. The benefits are fewer however the further up the power band you go despite the increase, as the higher density libraries perform slightly worse at higher power than Kaveri.

Efficiency and Die Area Savings Power Saving and Power Consumption


View All Comments

  • albert89 - Monday, June 8, 2015 - link

    Tell me where you can buy one for that price. Because most I see are like this article described, double the price. Reply
  • Prashant Jain - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    Switchable Graphics is a real deal in Windows ecosystem, Linux lacks a ton of drivers and not expected to deliver more therefore AMD has scope in enterprise servers where Linux is thriving therefore AMD will succeed in long run if they somehow manage to have at par CPUs with Intel. Reply
  • Penti - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    Switchable graphics from AMD with Intel CPU's is just so much worse than Optimus. Reply
  • Wolfpup - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    And Optimus already doesn't work. I'm NEVER buying another PC with it, and am just thankful mine lets you disable it and run on the Nvidia GPU directly. Reply
  • duploxxx - Thursday, June 4, 2015 - link

    well nice to hear that switchable amd graphics sucks, so does optimus. setting manual profiles is ok with optimus, i supose the same with AMD, anything automatic is NOT.

    oh and every time i dock - undock my explorer, chrome, firefox will crash due to graphics issues... uber optimus.
  • barleyguy - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    Switchable graphics sucks, bad. My current work laptop is Intel/ATI, and I've also used Intel/NVidia. Neither one works as well as just a single video adapter. I've had issues with windows not refreshing, driver crashes, and just overall wonkiness.

    Luckily Dell lets you disable it completely in the BIOS. That tends to get rid of the issues.
  • RandUser - Thursday, June 4, 2015 - link

    It depends. On my ASUS laptop Optimus works perfectly, no isues. Reply
  • Margalus - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    1366x768 is perfectly fine on 15.6 inch devices... Reply
  • fokka - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    if you're bordering on blind, yes. Reply
  • meacupla - Wednesday, June 3, 2015 - link

    Actually, the blind and hard of seeing, benefit greatly from higher DPI with much sharper images.

    I wouldn't be surprised if 1366x768 caused blindness in the first place, however.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now