Power Consumption and Thermal Performance

The power consumption at the wall was measured with a 1080p display being driven through the HDMI port. In the graphs below, we compare the idle and load power of the Intel PPSTCK1A32WFC with other low power PCs evaluated before. For load power consumption, we ran Furmark 1.12.0 and Prime95 v27.9 together. The numbers track what one might expect from the combination of hardware components in the machine.

Idle Power Consumption

Load Power Consumption (Prime95 + FurMark)

It is not a surprise (given the tablet platform that is inside the Compute Stick) that the unit proves to be the least power-hungry of the lot.

Our thermal stress routine starts with the system at idle, followed by 30 minutes of pure CPU loading. This is followed by another 30 minutes of both CPU and GPU being loaded simultaneously. After this, the CPU load gets removed, allowing the GPU to be loaded alone for another 30 minutes. The various clocks in the system throughout this routine are presented in the graph below.

The cores burst up to 1.83 GHz for a few seconds, before settling down to 1.58 GHz during the pure CPU loading process. The core temperature plateaus around 76 C, while power consumption at the wall is slightly more than 6 W. With thee GPU also loaded, the temperature reaches 80 and the power consumption is closer to 9 W. However, the CPU and GPU frequencies adjust themselves to be within the power budget. The cores run at 1.3 GHz while the GPU is clocked at slightly more than 300 MHz. Removing the CPU load brings temperatures back to 75 C and power consumption to less than 7 W. The CPU cores idle at 500 MHz, while the GPU clocks in around 440 MHz.

It is a very effective thermal solution and the temperatures do not raise any alarm. The presence of active cooling definitely helps in this situation.

HTPC Credentials Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

103 Comments

View All Comments

  • mkozakewich - Friday, April 24, 2015 - link

    I'd just get a $100 WinBook and mount it to the back of the monitor.
  • Teknobug - Saturday, April 25, 2015 - link

    The wifi network in these little things are usually terrible.
  • Eric_WVGG - Monday, April 27, 2015 - link

    “Intel announced the Compute Stick […] Late last month, Google also introduced the Chromebit. Both of these point to the 'stick' computing platform being more than just a passing fad.”

    That doesn’t logically follow at all. Intel and Google and the rest of the PC industry produce tons of things that nobody buys.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now