Final Words

From a technological perspective, the new 850 EVO drives do not bring anything new to the table since it's essentially the 2.5" 850 EVO in a smaller form factor, but what it does bring to the market is more selection in mSATA and M.2 form factors using the SATA protocols. There still aren't too many mSATA/M.2 retail drives available, so the 850 EVO adds a lot of value to that segment because it's by far the fastest mSATA/M.2 SSD and in general the 850 EVO is one of the highest performing SATA drives on the market. 

With that said, I do have some concerns regarding the 1TB model and its performance. Especially the IO consistency with 50-second pauses is worrying. While that won't have any major impact on very light workloads, anything that taxes the drive a bit more may run into the issue, which is basically that the drive stops for up to dozens of seconds (i.e. your system freezes). Until Samsung fixes that, I would advise against buying the 1TB version unless you have a very light workload (web browsing, email, etc.). I suspect it's fixable through a firmware update, but I'll have to wait for Samsung's reply to be sure of that.

Amazon Price Comparison (3/29/2015)
  120/128GB 240/250/256GB 480/500/512GB 1TB
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA $80 $130 $230 $450
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 $80 $130 $230 -
Samsung 840 EVO mSATA $89 $150 $228 $429
Crucial M550 mSATA $172 $107 $184 -
Crucial M500 M.2 $88 $129 $244 -
Crucial MX200 mSATA - $120 $213 -
Crucial MX200 M.2 - $120 $226 -
Plextor M6M mSATA $76 $133 $280 -
Mushkin Atlas Deluxe mSATA $65 $108 $183 -

The 850 EVO mSATA/M.2 is already available on Amazon and the pricing appears to be fairly competitive. It's not the cheapest mSATA/M.2 drive around, but the premium isn't that significant when taking 850 EVO's feature set into account (5-year warranty, hardware encryption etc.). 

All in all, the 850 EVO presents another option to users who are looking for an mSATA or M.2 SSD. It's equipped with the same extensive feature set as its 2.5" sibling, the performance is good and the pricing is fair. As long as Samsung is able to fix the 1TB mSATA on a timely manner, I have no reason not to recommend the 850 EVO. After all, it's still the only mSATA with 1TB capacity.

Idle Power Consumption & TRIM Validation
Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    Was really disappointed with the 1TB results. Also disappointed no ultra m2 interface. I wont be upgrading until I can get a pci-e 3.0 x4 interface on the drive. The samsung sm951 is where its at.
  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    Really annoying that I dont see this drive for sale anywhere and it's been talked about for a loooong time
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    RamCity just got its first SM951 batch, so it's now available for purchase.

    https://www.ramcity.com.au/upgrade/data-storage/in...
  • bricko - Thursday, April 2, 2015 - link

    Is the 951 NVMe - How to they compare to the new Intel 750 series which are PCIe gen 3 and NVMe
    seen here
    http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/340041-intel-l...

    http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=...

    Intel are launching the new 750 Series range of SSD's these are PCI-E 3.0 versions with 4 lanes and are NVMe based SSD's
  • goodyes - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    Ya, but results that I have a 1TB 840 msata and write sequential at more than 500MBps around 520max MBps, and now I see than new 850 msata tops at ?? 480MBps ?? cannot be possible what my eyes look, AND WHY THE HELL NO ONE REVIEWER COMPARE With olders 840 msata, so I must think that all of you guys are a paid reviewers and you get money from samsung, if not, YOU MUST compare to older model
  • KenPC - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    I am seriously concerned that the 840 evo, and TLC in general may indeed have an uncurable problem with slowdown after a period of time. This same problem has also been reported in multiple instances for Samsung OEM drives based on the 840 evo TLC technology.

    GIven that the 850 evo msata line was delayed by Samsung by about a month, it might be possible that the Anandtech review units were actually tested in late Feb and the go-ahead to publish the results only recently provided.

    I did also notice that the estimated 'March" timeframe for a new 840 evo firmware has come and passed, as well as no drive magician support for the 850 evo m2/msata drives yet.

    Anandtech results for the 1TB 850 evo unit are also quite concerning.

    So, I also join the crowd asking for a look at the 850 evo 2.5 and msata drives after some time has passed to see if they suffer from the slowdown problem too.

    And a rhetorical, but serious question - does anybody actually have a Samsung TLC drive that has NOT suffered from the slowdown as measured by the proper tools a few months after the drive was formatted/set up?

    And kudos to Anandtech - for an SSD review that really tests the drives, not just a run of ATTO or such.
  • Per Hansson - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    "anything that taxes the drive a bit more may run into the issue, which is basically that the drive stops for up to dozens of seconds (i.e. your system freezes). Until Samsung fixes that, I would advise against buying the 1TB version unless you have a very light workload (web browsing, email, etc.). I suspect it's fixable through a firmware update, but I'll have to wait for Samsung's reply to be sure of that."

    A wise man once said: if you wait for a firmware fix for your Samsung SSD's you will wait a long time.
    He died of old age.
    RIP Samsung 840 TLC drives.
  • Dzungpv - Friday, April 3, 2015 - link

    Missing Temperature when idle, full load or stretch, i want this information before buy them .
  • szhosain - Sunday, April 5, 2015 - link

    As far as I can tell, you only tested the M.2 version of the Samsung 850 EVO in a 500GB size.

    Can we assume that the MSATA version of that drive and size will perform essentially identically?
  • voicequal - Monday, April 13, 2015 - link

    Good catch on the poor mSATA 1TB performance during the performance consistency test. It harkens back to the early Jmicron stuttering days. I was similarly affected by the SanDisk U100 a few years ago. The system freezes, particularly when swap file is active, and disk throughput drops to low single digit MB/s. Hard to believe the most modern SSDs can still get into this state. Vanilla benchmarks don't show the problem.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now