QFE2550 Antenna Tuner

One of the first areas to explore would be the RF front end, and before we jump into deep discussions we’ll tackle some of the simpler sections first. The QFE25xx antenna tuner is similar to the envelope tracker in the sense that it’s normally not part of the RF front end. I never actually mentioned an envelope tracker or antenna tuner at any step in the introduction. This is because these parts are not part of the basic superheterodyne radio system. However, like envelope tracking, the need for more battery life, faster data, and superior reception has driven the development of new technologies.

To understand how this antenna tuner works, we must introduce the concept of impedance matching and impedance. Impedance seems difficult at first, but is really just a form of resistance in an AC circuit for the purposes of understanding this article. The three components in a circuit that affect impedance are resistors, capacitors, and inductors. Impedance matching is exactly what it sounds like, which is equalizing the impedance at a junction. In transferring energy from an antenna to the RF front end, we must match the impedance between the antenna and front end. This is because if the impedances are mismatched, signal reflects back to the source. In other words, on the receiving side reception becomes weaker if impedance is mismatched, and on the transmission side energy is wasted. One can liken this to a glossy display, as while the vast majority of the light goes through the glass cover, some light is reflected back.

Of course, in the factory the RF system is carefully tuned to ensure that impedance mismatch is as low as possible. However, the real world makes for a difficult situation. The iPhone 4’s death grip behavior is a classic example of how real-world use can disrupt this impedance matching. By bridging two gaps in the metal ring of the iPhone 4, the antenna was detuned and its impedance was altered. As a result, signal became noticeably worse. Combined with the compressed signal representation, this made it possible for a “decent signal” to be completely lost by touching the right place on the phone.

This is where the QFE2550 antenna tuner and similar systems come in. By acting as a voltage-controlled variable capacitor, the baseband can be loaded with information that allows it to predict how much mismatch correction is needed for each detected scenario, which is accomplished with various sensors that can include capacitive touch sensors. Each situation is compensated for by using pre-loaded corrections that are loaded when a given scenario is detected based on frequency change or body loading scenarios. As a result, the efficiency of the antenna is restored as seen in the photo above, although the presence of body loading will inevitably reduce peak power and sensitivity. Such a system can be combined with more information, such as capacitive touch sensors or reflected power measurements to ensure maximum responsiveness and performance. This has the greatest benefit in enabling phones with all-metal unibodies, although other tools such as antenna switched diversity and MIMO can be used to ensure peak reception.

QFE33xx CMOS PA/Switch

Normally, power amplifiers are not worth talking about. However, with the introduction of RF360 Qualcomm has bandied about the concept of a CMOS PA to cover a wide swath of bands rather than just a few. While this sounds interesting, there’s a great deal more nuance to this issue than simply band coverage. First, semiconductor/solid state physics is required to really understand where the debate lies. Of course, there’s really no time to go over this in major depth, but there are a few basics. The transistor is a switch that controls the flow of current. However, there is a limit to how much current can be carried, and there are a few regions in which the relationship between voltage and current differ. The two that we’ll talk about are the linear region and saturation region. The linear region is exactly what it sounds like. Voltage and current are linearly related, following Ohm’s law. The saturation region is where this falls apart, and more voltage is needed to increase current by the same amount, and we see diminishing returns until maximum current is reached.

"IvsV mosfet" by User:CyrilB. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

So this is where we see a fundamental difference in the implementation of a CMOS PA and GaAs PA. Gallium arsenide has higher electron mobility, even in saturation mode. This makes it easier for GaAs circuits to switch at incredibly high frequencies such as 60 GHz for WiGig/802.11ad. In addition, unlike silicon-based transistors, gallium arsenide transistors are generally heat-insensitive, and pure GaAs has high resistance and dielectric constant, which means that it serves as an excellent substrate for various components for the same reasons that silicon-on-insulator (SOI) is a good substrate for CMOS logic. In addition, GaAs-based transistors are highly linear in behavior when compared to CMOS technologies, so a GaAs PA can operate much closer to maximum current without clipping the signal.

However, GaAs is not perfect. For one, CMOS logic is impossible to implement using current technologies. This is because unlike current CMOS technology where there are NMOS and PMOS transistors, GaAs-based transistors do not have a p-channel equivalent. As a result, the controls available over a GaAs PA are significantly cruder than what is possible with a CMOS PA. GaAs PAs are also noticeably less efficient at low power levels, also known as the backoff condition. Therefore, CMOS PAs tend to be more power efficient at lower power states as they can have multiple “maximum power states” to scale the PA as needed. In practice, Qualcomm claims that we’re still looking at around a 5-10% efficiency delta at max power when compared to GaAs PAs, which means that CMOS PAs are close to GaAs PAs in efficiency.

Despite the differences in efficiency, a CMOS PA is still a valid option in smartphones due to the fact that a single PA can cover far more bands than an equivalent GaAs PA, as the PAE curve across a spread of frequencies is relatively flat compared to a GaAs PA which is effectively a single peak. In addition, the fact that the PA is built on CMOS means that there is additional integration capability. In its current incarnation, the QFE33xx already has an integrated antenna switch, and there is potential for greater integration with parts that share a similar process node.

This concludes RF360, which gives a broad survey of what’s on the market today. Combined with our previous piece on MDM9x25, it’s possible to get a good idea of the current state of the market. However, the latest and greatest modems and transceivers mean that it’s time to talk about UE category 6, 9, and 10 LTE and the various challenges that come with new capabilities.

Introduction and RF RF: WTR3925, MDM9x35, MDM9x45
POST A COMMENT

119 Comments

View All Comments

  • jerrylzy - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    "Yes, but not this chip. It's going to be Qualcomm's main chip in 2015, it's still getting beaten by year old tech."

    Please specify what "year old tech" is. The first mobile A57 implementation is Exynos 5433, which is by no means a "year old tech." Also, Snapdragon 810 uses a newer revision r1p1. I cannot see your point here.

    "Nevertheless, GPU power matters. This SoC will struggle with 4K and its supposed to be the high-end. Disappointing."

    If excluding Apple and NVIDIA, Adreno 430 has the highest GPU power in mobile space. It also has much higher power efficiency compared to ARM Mali-T760 implementations. Adreno 430 may not be competent enough in tablet space, but it is one of the best smartphone GPU available right now.
    Reply
  • jerrylzy - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    I also doubt whether 4K display will appear any time soon on 5.5" or smaller phones. Reply
  • mkozakewich - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    Also, it'll do just fine on 4K. The benchmarks were running complex graphical scenes, like games, but most games run at lower resolutions anyway. Reply
  • Ethos Evoss - Sunday, February 22, 2015 - link

    Yeah they just tricking putting best HW into smartphones WHICH ppl will NEVER use like LTE Cat 6 yeah OK .. please qualcom show me who supports it RIGHT now that I can fully use it ..
    And they implementing cat 9 jesus christ wich will be standard like within 5-10 years ?
    Come ooon qualcom wha for ?
    Packing so many things in SoC we wont even use it within 5 years..
    and exactly battery stay last half day right ?
    Reply
  • douglord - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    VERY disappointing performance. This will be crushed by the IPhone 7 in both CPU and GPU. And this can't even compete with K1 in the tablet market. The X1 should own the Android tablet space. Reply
  • kron123456789 - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Yeah, it should, but unfortunately it won't. Just like previous Tegra chips. Tegra X1 still has impressive GPU performance though. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Tegra X1 needs to get power far lower to be in most tablets and smartphones, and given the lack of success with getting Tegra K1 into lots of devices I wouldn't expect X1 to fare any better. Reply
  • blanarahul - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    AnandTech's opinion on big.LITTLE vs. Qualcomm's, Intel's and Apple's approach. Reply
  • blaktron - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    Won't high end Android tablets start shipping with Core-M chips this year? If not, why not? There isn't any technical reason. There really isn't any way for other SoC makers to catch up with manufacturers moving to big chips... Reply
  • kron123456789 - Friday, February 13, 2015 - link

    The Core-M chip costs $281 per unit.
    http://ark.intel.com/products/family/83613/Intel-C...
    That's why nobody will put it in a tablet with price less than $1000. And this is too much for Android tablet, even high-end.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now