Performance Metrics - I

The ASRock VisionX 471D was evaluated using our standard test suite for low power desktops / industrial PCs. We revamped our benchmark suite early last year after the publication of the Intel D54250WYK NUC review. We reran some of the new benchmarks on the older PCs also, but some of them couldn't be run on loaner samples. Therefore, the list of PCs in each graph might not be the same.

Futuremark PCMark 8

PCMark 8 provides various usage scenarios (home, creative and work) and offers ways to benchmark both baseline (CPU-only) as well as OpenCL accelerated (CPU + GPU) performance. We benchmarked select PCs for the OpenCL accelerated performance in all three usage scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU in the system. In the case of the VisionX 471D, the AMD R9 270MX also pitches in for the OpenCL accelerated components. The end result is that the combination of the Core i7-4712MQ and the AMD R9 270MX GPU results in the VisionX 471D coming out on top for two out of the three PCMark 8 workloads. In certain workloads with more emphasis on single-threaded performance, the higher clocks in the Core i5 2C/4T CPUs result in the VisionX 471D coming in behind the VisionX 420D and the GIGABYTE GB-BXi5G-760.

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Home OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Creative OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Work OpenCL

Miscellaneous Futuremark Benchmarks

Futuremark PCMark 7 - PCMark Suite Score

The PCMark Suite in PCMark 7 doesn't benefit much from OpenCL acceleration. This makes the higher-clocked Core i5-based systems take the lead. The Core i7-4770R-based GB-BXi7-4770R has a TDP of 65W and is clocked much higher than the other CPUs in the graph. So, it is no surprise that the BRIX Pro comes out on top in that benchmark.

Futuremark 3DMark 11 - Extreme Score

Futuremark 3DMark 2013 - Ice Storm Score

Futuremark 3DMark 2013 - Cloud Gate Score

The 3DMark benchmarks show that the main tussle is between the NVIDIA GTX 760 in the BXi5G-760 and the AMD R9 270MX in the VisionX 420D/471D.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15

We have moved on from R11.5 to R15 for 3D rendering evaluation. CINEBENCH R15 provides three benchmark modes - OpenGL, single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of select PCs in all three modes provided us the following results. As described earlier, the higher clocked CPUs perform better in the single threaded mode. When it comes to mult-threaded performance, the 4C/8T i7-based systems take the lead, with the higher clocked 65 W TDP versions taking a significant lead.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Single Thread

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Multiple Threads

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - OpenGL

The OpenGL run is definitely in favour of the NVIDIA GPU-equipped BRIX Gaming PC, but the VisionX versions definitely show a big increase in performance over the Iris Pro-equipped systems.

Introduction and Setup Impressions Performance Metrics - II
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kevin G - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    According to the manual on ASrock's site, yes it is an MXM card and it can be changed. The real question is what MXM cards are readily available to put into that system.
  • Samus - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Quadro's. lol.
  • DanNeely - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Not just available; but unless you mod the cooling, suitably low TDP. The R9 M270X's TDP isn't public; but is probably a bit under the similar (except for higher clocks) 50W M275X.
  • basroil - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I got excited for a bit thinking I finally found a nice controller for a kinect powered robot I have... but then I read the review and saw it's pretty much useless... Guess I have to wait for the 960 / 970m powered Brix....
  • nos024 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Weak. For that price, you can build a system that is much better with the Raven RVZ01 case. WTH are these companies smoking?
  • iniudan - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    That raven case is like 5-6 time the volume of this, that not a proper comparison.
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I'd rather they had their own version of the Heatsync 7000 so the unit required no fans.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Nice toy have but as others have mentioned, it is too expensive.
    What can we build using a mini-itx board for that price?
    If size didn't matter, this is a mid-range gaming system from its cost.
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    a mini PC review with no word on dimension or any size comparison , just great.
  • mostlyharmless - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Still hoping for a mini-PC stackable module standard that would reduce the tangle of cables to a manageable few.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now