Introduction and Setup Impressions

ASRock has been one of the few motherboard vendors to focus on mini-PCs targeting the HTPC and portable gaming markets. Starting from the ION-based nettop days, they have consistently refreshed the mini-PC lineup in sync with Intel's product cycle. We reviewed the Haswell-based VisionX 420D last September. Instead of waiting for Broadwell / Skylake, ASRock has taken the opportunity of falling flash memory prices to bring out a mid-generation update in the form of the VisionX 471D.

In terms of external appearance, the VisionX 471D and the VisionX 420D are one and the same. However, there are two major updates under the hood. The Core i5-4200M is replaced by a Core i7-4712MQ, and the empty mSATA slot in the VisionX 420D now comes occupied by an ASint mSATA SSD. These two updates address some of the improvement aspects that we noted in our VisionX 420D review. In the rest of this review, we will see how the new VisionX 471D fares in our mini-PC evaluation routine. In particular, we will see if there are tangible improvements in real-life workloads, while also identify any caveats that arise due to the additional capabilities.

The specifications of the ASRock VisionX 471D are summarized in the table below.. The specifications of our review unit are summarized in the table below.

ASRock VisionX 471D Specifications
Processor Intel Haswell Core i7-4712MQ
(4C/8T x 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz Turbo), 22nm, 6MB L2, 37W)
Memory 2 x 4GB ASint SSA304G08-EGN1B DDR3-1600
Graphics AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1 GB GDDR5 VRAM)
775 MHz (core) / 1125 MHz (memory)
Disk Drive(s) 256 GB ASint mSATA SSDMSK256G-M1
2 TB Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
Optical Drive(s) Lite-On Internal Slim DVD+/-RW Drive (DL-8A4SH-01)
Networking 1 x Gigabit Ethernet, 2x2 802.11ac mPCIe
Audio Capable of 5.1/7.1 digital output with HD audio bitstreaming (HDMI)
Operating System Retail unit is barebones, but we installed Windows 8.1 Pro x64
Pricing (As configured) $999
Full Specifications ASRock VisionX 471D Specifications

The VisionX 471D comes in a barebones configuration (i.e, no OS installed). However, the RAM and disk drives are already pre-installed. A DVD with the drivers and utilities is also supplied with the package. Usually, a USB key would be preferable. However, the unit comes with an optical drive, and that justifies the driver DVD. In any case, we ended up installing the latest drivers downloaded off ASRock's product support page. In addition to the main unit, the other components of the package include a 120 W (19V @ 6.32A) adapter, a power cord (customized to the country of sale), a MHL cable, a DVD to VGA adapter, a Media Center remote, an OEM version of CyberLink PowerDVD 10 and a quick-start guide. The internal setup also provides space for a second 2.5" drive. The package also includes appropriate SATA power and data cables as well as screws for mounting the optional drive.

The gallery below takes us around the hardware inside the unit.

The most interesting new component inside the unit is the ASint mSATA SSD. ASint seems to be more of an OEM supplier, given the fact that there is absolutely no reference to the SSDMSK256G-M1 model being used by ASRock anywhere on the Internet. Even ASint's product page doesn't carry the model as yet. In any case, thanks to easy accessibility, we were able to determine that the SSDMSK256G-M1 is based on the JMicron JMF667H combined with four IMFT 64 GB 20nm NAND chips. We have already carried out a detailed review of the reference kit with the new firmware. Readers now know what to expect - a decent performer that is also economical. While ASRock used to sell their premium Vision 3D PCs a couple of years back at $1000, we now have a 256 GB mSATA SSD integrated along with a Core i7 CPU at the same price.

In the table below, we have an overview of the various systems that we are comparing the ASRock VisionX 471D against. Note that they may not belong to the same market segment. The relevant configuration details of the machines are provided so that readers have an understanding of why some benchmark numbers are skewed for or against the ASRock VisionX 471D when we come to those sections.

Comparative PC Configurations
Aspect ASRock VisionX 471D
CPU Intel Core i7-4712MQ Intel Core i7-4712MQ
GPU AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon R9 M270X (1GB GDDR5)
RAM ASint SSA304G08-EGN1B
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
2x 4GB
ASint SSA304G08-EGN1B
11-11-11-28 @ 1600 MHz
2x 4GB
Storage ASint mSATA SSDMSK256G-M1
(256 GB; mSATA 6 Gb/s; 20nm; MLC))
Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
(2 TB; 2.5in SATA; 5400 RPM)
ASint mSATA SSDMSK256G-M1
(256 GB; mSATA 6 Gb/s; 20nm; MLC))
Seagate Samsung Spinpoint M9T ST2000LM003
(2 TB; 2.5in SATA; 5400 RPM)
Wi-Fi Broadcom BCM4352 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter
(2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps)
Broadcom BCM4352 802.11ac Wireless Network Adapter
(2x2 802.11ac - 867 Mbps)
Price (in USD, when built) $999 $999
Performance Metrics - I
POST A COMMENT

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kevin G - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    According to the manual on ASrock's site, yes it is an MXM card and it can be changed. The real question is what MXM cards are readily available to put into that system. Reply
  • Samus - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Quadro's. lol. Reply
  • DanNeely - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Not just available; but unless you mod the cooling, suitably low TDP. The R9 M270X's TDP isn't public; but is probably a bit under the similar (except for higher clocks) 50W M275X. Reply
  • basroil - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I got excited for a bit thinking I finally found a nice controller for a kinect powered robot I have... but then I read the review and saw it's pretty much useless... Guess I have to wait for the 960 / 970m powered Brix.... Reply
  • nos024 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Weak. For that price, you can build a system that is much better with the Raven RVZ01 case. WTH are these companies smoking? Reply
  • iniudan - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    That raven case is like 5-6 time the volume of this, that not a proper comparison. Reply
  • boe - Tuesday, February 03, 2015 - link

    I'd rather they had their own version of the Heatsync 7000 so the unit required no fans. Reply
  • zodiacfml - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Nice toy have but as others have mentioned, it is too expensive.
    What can we build using a mini-itx board for that price?
    If size didn't matter, this is a mid-range gaming system from its cost.
    Reply
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    a mini PC review with no word on dimension or any size comparison , just great. Reply
  • mostlyharmless - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Still hoping for a mini-PC stackable module standard that would reduce the tangle of cables to a manageable few. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now