Though the first PowerVR Series 6XT-equipped products have only recently launched – including the unexpectedly powerful iPad Air 2 – the development cycle for SoCs and the realities of IP licensing mean that Imagination is already focusing on GPU designs for late 2015 and beyond. Just as one design reaches consumer hands the next generation gets completed, and the SoC integration work begins.

Taking place this week are Imagination Technologies’ Chinese idc14 and Imagination Summits developer events. While Imagination holds these events in multiple countries over the year, the Chinese event is in many respects the most important from a hardware standpoint. With the bulk of SoC GPU licensees headquartered in the Asia-Pacific region – firms such as Allwinner, Rockchip, and Samsung – Imagination’s Chinese event is perhaps their biggest customer event and consequently an important venue for product announcements. Again this backdrop Imagination will be using this week’s events to announce the next generation of PowerVR GPUs, PowerVR Series7.

PowerVR Series7 is the the successor to Imagination’s current PowerVR Series 6XT lineup of GPUs. Like Series 6XT, Series7 is composed of two variants, Series7XT for the high end and Series7XE for the low-end, and in turn each contains a number of individual configurations. Ranging from half a shader cluster (USC) to 16 clusters, Imagination is seeking to cover virtually the entire range of SoC-equipped devices, from high-end IoT/wearables to tablets, set top boxes, and even HPC severs.

From an architectural standpoint Series7 will be a further iteration on Imagination’s Rogue architecture, which was first used in 2012’s Series6. With each generation Imagination has further tweaked and expanded their designs to improve performance/efficiency and to cover new use cases, and for Series7 the story is much the same. This year Imagination has sat down with us to give us an overview of what’s new and changed in their architecture for Series7, so let’s dive right in.

PowerVR GPU Comparison
  Series7XT Series7XE Series6XT Series6XE
Clusters 2 - 16 0.5 - 1 2 - 8 0.5 - 1
FP32 FLOPs/Clock 128 - 1024 32 - 64 128 - 512 32 - 64
FP16 FLOPs/Clock 256 - 2048 64 - 128 256 - 1024 64 - 128
Pixels/Clock (ROPs) 4 - 32? 2 - 4? 4 - 16 2 - 4
Texels/Clock 4 - 32 1 - 2 4 - 16 1 - 2
OpenGL ES 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Android Extension Pack / Tessellation Yes Optional Optional No
Direct3D Base: FL 10_0
Optional: FL 11_1
FL 9_3 FL 10_0 FL 9_3
OpenCL Base: 1.2 EB
Optional: 1.2 FP
1.2 EB 1.2 EB 1.2 EB
Architecture Rogue Rogue Rogue Rogue

 

PowerVR Series7 Architecture

From an architectural standpoint Imagination is already starting in a strong position for Series7 with the Rogue architecture. With the Rogue USCs implementing a modern shader pipeline, there’s no innate weakness to the design that requires correction. However as is the case for all SoC GPUs, there is a constant need to deliver better power efficiency and space efficiency, as these are the primary factors limiting overall performance and fabrication improvements alone can’t deliver all of the necessary gains. For this reason Imagination has continued to iterate on the Rogue architecture for Series7 to further improve its efficiency and resulting performance.

Outside of the underlying architecture however, there is also the need to deliver new features to keep up with modern APIs, developer demands, and of course the competitive landscape. In that respect Series6XT is a bit more dated; while it supports OpenGL ES 3.1 its base configuration (by far the most common) does not have the hardware features to support the more extensive Android Extension Pack, and for that matter it also lacks the features necessary to support Direct3D feature level 11. For these reasons Series7 will also be responsible for delivering feature improvements to Imagination’s GPU lineup to keep it up to date with the latest standards.

Looking at the overall architecture then (with an emphasis on 7XT), what we find is still very much Rogue in nature and is called as much by Imagination. While various blocks have been upgraded or overhauled in some manner, there is only a single new block. Available on the base configuration of the 7XT and as an option for the 7XE it is the Tessellation Co-Processor. Exactly as the name describes it, the Tessellation Co-Processor is hardware block responsible for and working in conjunction with the Vertex Data Master to implement full tessellation support. The tessellator itself is fixed function for power efficiency reasons, with hull and domain shading handled through shading hardware. The addition of tessellation hardware along with the standard inclusion of ASTC support are the major functional changes that enable Android Extension Pack support on the base Series7XT over the base Series6XT.

For the other blocks, Imagination has implemented improvements all throughout the architecture. The geometry performance of the Vertex Data Master (geometry frontend) has been doubled to alleviate bottlenecking there. Meanwhile the Compute Data Master has been upgraded as well to allow it to setup wavefronts more quickly (up to 300% faster), which is especially helpful for quickly processing large numbers of small kernels, something Imagination tells us was more common than expected.

Finally the Coarse Grain Scheduler has also been upgraded in conjunction with the USCs. Primarily focusing on reducing inter-tile dependencies, Series7 can now more frequently issue work to idle USCs that in Series6/XT/XE were waiting on other USCs to finish their work before the whole block moved on. With fewer dependencies, idle USCs can now be issued work from other sources or move on to their next tile in a larger number of circumstances.

Diving into the Series7 USC, what we find is again largely similar to Series6XT. The number of FP16 and FP32 ALUs and resulting floating point operation throughput is unchanged, however the Special Function Unit (SFU) has received a pair of changes. First and foremost, the SFU can now natively handle FP16 operations along with FP32 operations, whereas the 6XT SFU would promote everything to FP32. By offering native FP16 execution, Imagination is able to avoid wasting power by not doing unnecessary higher precision work on FP16 data sets. Keep in mind that SFU operations are already relatively expensive, so native FP16 special functions should have a tangible impact on power consumption. Meanwhile though it’s drawn as a single SFU in Imagination’s logical diagrams, I suspect that part of this change is that Imagination has implemented separate FP16 and FP32 SFUs as part of the existing FP16 and FP32 ALU blocks, in which case there are actually 2 SFUs (though just like the ALUs you can only use one at a time).

Speaking of utilizing, the second SFU enhancement has to deal with when it can be used. Starting with Series7, SFU operations can now be co-issued with ALU operations, allowing for both blocks to be used at once as opposed to one or the other on 6XT. Now to be clear here only SFUs can be co-issued, and wavefronts can only use either the FP16 or FP32 ALUs (and not both at once), but there is now a degree of co-issue capability within a USC that was not available before. Imagination tells us that SFUs were coming up in code more than expected, and as a result adding co-issue capabilities would improve performance.

To accomplish this, Imagination has expanded their instruction set to enable co-issue functionality along with further improving performance. New bundled/fused instructions have been added, which are what trigger the co-issued SFU. These fused instructions also allow for certain common sequences that are issued over multiple instructions to instead be issued as a single fused instruction, which in turn reduces code size slightly and potentially allows for these operations to be performed in fewer cycles.

Meanwhile, exclusive to Series7XT is optional support for FP64 operations. If the FP64 is included in the exact 7XT core licensed, each pipeline gets a single FP64 ALU, which allows them to process up to 2 FLOPs/USC/clock.

Finally, while not a graphics feature pre-se, Series7 will be introducing one more feature to the family. A base feature in 7XT and optional to 7XE will be GPU support for hardware security zones, which uses virtualization technology to create up to 8 zones that are fully isolated from each other.

Within the mobile space application sandboxing is already common, and indeed this functionality is already present on a number of CPUs. However in the case of security zones that are only supported on the CPU, the zone separation essentially has to be emulated on the GPU, requiring a full task flush and reload of the entire GPU in order to switch between tasks. Besides not being performant, software enforced security is functionally less robust than hardware enforced security and in turn means the GPU can in theory be used to attack other zones.

Consequently for Series7 Imagination is adding security zone support to their hardware to go along with the security zones already supported with CPUs. From a practical standpoint what we’re looking at is the capability to do better application sandboxing to keep applications from getting out and touching other parts of the system. This is something of a mixed bag for users since sandboxing can be used for both good and evil. Hardware zones can be used to secure certain high-profile applications (banking, health, Apple Pay, etc), but said zones are also responsible for enabling stronger DRM on video content and hardening the system against jailbreaks in cases where direct root access is not allowed by the manufacturer.

Series 7XT & Series 7XE
POST A COMMENT

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • chizow - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Nvidia GPU SoC tech can be licensed, it just hasn't happened (yet). Reply
  • takeship - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    Nvidia SoC tech can't be licensed. The terms they've put out are intentionally prohibitative. What the can do though, and have done, is legally claim to offer "licenses", and then sue all the market players when no one opts to spring for it and price themselves out of the market. Which is also what they've done. Reply
  • chizow - Wednesday, November 12, 2014 - link

    And you know this how? I think the various lawsuits ongoing will be the impetus to establish the first licensees of Nvidia IP. Reply
  • hahmed330 - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    In such a high end configuration why bother with FP16 Flops. It's a waste of die space. How relevant is FP16 in mobile configurations though nowadays? How huge is the quality degradation on a 7 inch screen? Reply
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    "How relevant is FP16 in mobile configurations though nowadays?"

    Actually, very. FP16 is still significantly used because it can deliver the necessary quality at lower power. Games will tend towards FP32, but for desktop composition and such FP16 is more than plenty and is a task the GPU is frequently doing.
    Reply
  • lefty2 - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    When you use "lowp" in your shader it is using FP16. Shaders written for mobile games typically use lowp as much as possible, as it greatly increases performance, but desktop GPUs do not use them at all. Reply
  • coder111 - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Ok, so are they going to provide proper Linux drivers?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_...

    If not, they SUCK!

    On the other hand, seeing mobile devices/tablets get similar level of GPU as dedicated consoles like PS3 and xbox360 is nice. Well, ok, ps3 and xbox360 are now 1 generation old, but still these are MOBILE GPUs.
    Reply
  • GC2:CS - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    "Though the first PowerVR Series 6XT-equipped products have only recently launched – including the unexpectedly powerful iPad Air 2..."

    You stole that from my mounth.... iPad Air 2 has an insanely fast GPU, they just kind of crushed it in that area.
    The A8X matches the best nvidia offering at significally lower power with insane sustained performance.

    And now you got an Series 7 GPU's... With rumors of Apple pushing heavilly for an 16nm Fin Fet Plus proces from TSMC which got some big power savings coupled with these GPU's... I think we will see that yearly doubling of GPU performance once more (and possibly last time, at least until we are stucked with silicone).

    The question is, how big those are, with series 6XT we saw a 50% efficiency gain, but a far bigger GPU size as well. As TSMC 16FF+ is not that much of a shrink at all it could be a problem going with an even bigger architecture.... Even then an A9 and A9X build on a mature 20nm process with GT7400/7600 and somewhat higher clock speeds could bring some prety big improvements as well.

    Then there is nvidia, can Apple defeat them like this year ?
    Or will nvidia finaly show what they can do for mobile ?
    Reply
  • pSupaNova - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    I think you have it the wrong way round.

    Nvidia has the more powerful CPU core uses less transistors and was running on a worse process.

    While if you bothered to read this article has implemented more functions in its GPU Tessellation, DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.4 & Android Extension Pack.

    Anandtech has the K1 tabs beating the IPad Air in the GPU tests.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/8670/google-nexus-9-...
    Reply
  • lucam - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Really? It seems (from preliminary results) the Nexus 9 is behind, although the difference is negligible.
    We must have different interpretations of numbers and words...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now