Civilization: Beyond Earth Testing Notes

Along with discussions of the performance, there are also a few bugs and other quirks in many games that could use fixing. In the case of Civilization: Beyond Earth, my testing has uncovered a few issues. First and foremost, the problem with the MSI GS60 running at higher than 1080p definitely needs a fix (most likely from NVIDIA's or Intel's drivers, though possibly it's something specific to the laptop that MSI would need to fix, or perhaps it's something with the game itself).

Another issue I encountered (which might be hardware specific) is that the game always drops to a 24Hz refresh rate on my Acer XB280HK LCD; the monitor supports 3840x2160 at 60Hz, and if I change the refresh rate after the game has started everything is fine. When I exit and restart, unfortunately, the game is back to 24Hz even though the settings claim it's at 59Hz.

Of course I'd also love to see the support for Mantle SFR "just work" without requiring any manual tweaking of configuration files. Fixing Mantle support for users with more than two GPUs is a known issue, though it only likely affects a handful of users. Another known issue is that if Windows is set to anything other than 100% scaling, the game basically breaks right now – your mouse cursor doesn't map properly to the screen coordinates so you can't click on buttons or units. And let me just say that a 28" display running at 3840x2160 does not result in particularly legible text (in Windows) for my tired old eyes at 100% scaling.

While I'm here talking about fixes, it would also be great if Firaxis improved the usefulness of the benchmark results. Right now, all it generates is a CSV file with one long line of comma separated values containing the frame rendering times (in milliseconds). That's certainly better than nothing, but I had to create a macro to convert the row into a column, calculate the total time and number of frames (and thereby the average FPS), as well as determining the instantaneous frame times. In some ways it's easier to just use FRAPS to log the performance during the benchmark, but of course FRAPS only works with Direct3D and OpenGL and not Mantle.

Being able to launch the benchmark from a command prompt without Steam complaining about the extra command line parameters (see above dialog) and being able to launch the Mantle version of the game from the command prompt would also be appreciated. The latter is a Firaxis issue, while Steam now appears to complain about any command line parameters on the games I've tested. Basically, if you're going to include a built-in benchmark, generating data in a more useful format and providing tools to automate testing multiple settings helps the people that will actually use the benchmark (i.e. hardware reviewers like me).

AMD CrossFire Performance Closing Thoughts
Comments Locked

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Monday, November 3, 2014 - link

    The benchmark is more of a "worst-case scenario" where there are tons of units on screen at once. Earlier in the game in particular, frame rates will be much higher, and even later in the game you often won't have as many units as shown in the benchmark. However, for people that play the game a lot and in particular on larger maps, things can really bog down. That's what the benchmark shows and while it's not perfect, it's at least repeatable.
  • Haravikk - Thursday, November 6, 2014 - link

    So far it seems like anything that can run Civ V should run Civ: Beyond Earth just as easily, which should include most recent integrated GPUs as well, though of course these may draw performance from the CPU which could slow your turns down later in the game.

    Regarding the Mantle performance; I would have been interested to see some measurements for AMD's APU's, perhaps in a follow-up article? While the improvements to discrete graphics are nice I find Mantle most interesting in the APU space, particularly with HSA, though I don't know if any titles support that yet?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now