Final Words

Throughout our review we've been looking at the strengths and weakness of these utilities. We've seen some that are geared towards beginners and others made for experts. The basics of these utilities remain the same, as they are designed to increase the frequencies of your video card. The biggest differences lie within the features and options of each utility and how much value they add for the user. Let's do a quick recap and compare the utilities we've looked at in our round-up.

To start things off, AMD's OverDrive appears to be a rather barebones utility. As with all of the utilities in our round-up, we get the core overclocking section with some entry level monitoring. OverDrive does have a practical interface that is less intimidating for beginners that are just learning to overclock. Admittedly, I didn't like the percentage based overclocking on GCN 1.1 and newer GPUs, and the lack of overall features keeps it from being an option for advanced users.

OverDrive users looking for more should direct their attention to Sapphire's TriXX utility and the ASUS GPU Tweak utility. Both utilities have a GPU voltage adjustment feature and also include beautiful and intuitive interfaces. When comparing these two utilities, I would consider TriXX to be a very functional utility but it's a bit basic in comparison to GPU Tweak, as it doesn't have the amount of features. However, there is one feature that TriXX has over GPU Tweak and that is GPU voltage adjustment for a larger range of AMD cards. This feature alone could put it in front of GPU Tweak as being a choice for advanced AMD overclockers.

As previously noted, GPU Tweak also works for both AMD and NVIDIA based graphics cards, which can make GPU Tweak enticing for users that often change video card manufactures. This also makes GPU Tweak a good entry level utility for overclockers with NVIDIA based video cards. While it's not as entry level as AMD's OverDrive, it's certainly not as complex as MSI Afterburner’s RivaTuner based utility.

Which brings us to MSI’s Afterburner and EVGA’s Precision X. These are the most popular utilities within the overclocking community. Unsurprisingly, Precision X and Afterburner are the most feature rich utilities in our round-up as well, and because of this they're also the most complex. First time overclockers may feel a bit in over their heads when using either of these utilities at first.

Both utilities offer features such as voltage adjustment, on screen display, in-depth monitoring, custom fan profiles, OC profiles, and more. While they both offer largely the same features, Afterburner tends to do them a bit better while offering more of them. For instance, Afterburner has a more extensive on screen display feature, a more in-depth monitoring section, video capture capabilities, and compatibility with both AMD and NVIDIA video cards. However, Precision X does offer some standout features, such as a subjectively better-looking interface, the fantastic OC Scanner X stress tester, and the Pixel Clock OC feature.

Ultimately when all is said and done, in the face of some very strong competition we feel that MSI Afterburner rises above the other overclocking utilities in our round-up. Afterburner’s long list of features certainly helps its case here, but it’s also an evolving utility that is constantly being updated and improved, more than any utility in our round-up. In addition, Afterburner’s developers have done their best to ensure that voltage control is available on a wide variety of video cards as well, making MSI’s voltage control support second to none. With such a wide feature set and backed by this type of commitment and support, for these reasons MSI Afterburner is the current gold standard among video card overclocking utilities.

MSI Afterburner
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • TiGr1982 - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    Well, these custom skins do not have any functional advantage over standard Windows UI design, obviously. At the same time, most people are not annoyed by custom skins, and some even find it nice. Then, for the people who don't like it, software utility vendors should provide a checkbox/radiobutton to switch to the plain skin.
  • Morawka - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    i ruined a Asus Pro Art IPS Monitor trying to pixel clock it. and i didn't even try anything crazy, just a mild overclock from 60hz to 90hz. The screen started flickering on and off every 15 seconds. Even reverting and trying the monitor on a different PC did not fix it. I will never try that again...
  • Iketh - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    I don't think there is anything "mild" about a 50% overclock..... smh
  • Khenglish - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    +1 for Trixx. It's the only tool that allows software voltage adjustment of mobile AMD GPUs.

    Also no Nvidia Inspector?
  • octiceps - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    +1 for Nvidia Inspector.
  • octiceps - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    Er...why is the Afterburner profiles settings window shown for Precision?
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    Whoops. This is what happens when you have so many images with similar names. Thanks for pointing that out.
  • Laststop311 - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    I've been using MSI afterburner for years now. It has the best options and is a truly solid performer. There is no point to use anything else as it does it all.
  • Nfarce - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    Regarding video capture and it lacking in Precision X, I have been very pleased with the separate offering from Nvidia (Shadowplay). Unlike FRAPS, it is relatively light on MB/GB file usage.
  • theNiZer - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    Michael Wilding: great article read, and great subject. I also very much like that you present your conclusion. I'll take MSI AB for a spinn

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now