UHD is dead. Not really, but it would seem that displays bigger than UHD/4K will soon be coming to market. The ability of being able to stitch two regular sized outputs into the same panel is now being exploited even more as Dell has announced during its Modern Workforce livestream about the new ‘5K’ Ultrasharp 27-inch display.  The ‘5K’ name comes from the 5120 pixels horizontally, but this panel screams as being two lots of 2560x2880 in a tiled display.

5120x2880 at 27 inches comes out at 218 PPI for a total of 14.7 million pixels. At that number of pixels per inch, we are essentially looking at a larger 15.4-inch Retina MBP or double a WQHD ASUS Zenbook UX301, and seems right for users wanting to upgrade their 13 year old IBM T220 for something a bit more modern.

Displays Sorted by PPI
Product Size / in Resolution PPI Pixels
LG G3 5.5 2560x1440 534 3,686,400
Samsung Galaxy S5 5.1 1920x1080 432 2,073,600
HTC One Max 5.9 1920x1080 373 2,073,600
Apple iPhone 5S 4 640x1136 326 727,040
Apple iPad mini Retina 7.9 2048x1536 324 2,777,088
Google Nexus 4 4.7 1280x768 318 983,040
Google Nexus 10 10 2560x1600 300 4,096,000
Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro 13.3 3200x1800 276 5,760,000
ASUS Zenbook UX301A 13.3 2560x1440 221 3,686,400
Apple Retina MBP 15" 15.4 2880x1800 221 5,184,000
Dell Ultrasharp 27" 5K 27 5120x2880 218 14,745,600
Nokia Lumia 820 4.3 800x480 217 384,000
IBM T220/T221 22.2 3840x2400 204 9,216,000
Dell UP2414Q 24 3840x2160 184 8,294,400
Dell P2815Q 28 3840x2160 157 8,294,400
Samsung U28D590D 28 3840x2160 157 8,294,400
ASUS PQ321Q 31.5 3840x2160 140 8,294,400
Apple 11.6" MacBook Air 11.6 1366x768 135 1,049,088
LG 34UM95 34 3440x1440 110 4,953,600
Korean 27" WQHD 27 2560x1440 109 3,686,400
Sharp 8K Prototype 85 7680x4320 104 33,177,600

Dell has been pretty quiet on the specifications, such as HDMI or DisplayPort support, though PC Perspective is reporting 16W integrated speakers. If the display is using tiling to divide up the transport workload over two outputs, that puts the emphasis squarely on two DP 1.2 connections. There is no mention of frame rates as of yet, nor intended color goals.

Clearly this panel is aimed more at workflow than gaming.  This is almost double 4K resolution in terms of pixels, and 4K can already bring down the majority of graphics cards to their knees, but we would imagine that the content producer and prosumer would be the intended market. Word is that this monitor will hit the shelves by Christmas, with a $2500 price tag.

Source: Dell

POST A COMMENT

75 Comments

View All Comments

  • meacupla - Sunday, September 07, 2014 - link

    Assuming the software/hardware in the monitor can downscale properly.
    Because I have yet to see a 1440p 27" monitor properly downscale to 720p without being super fuzy, beyond what a 720p should look like at 27"
    Reply
  • evilspoons - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    Finally, an era where you can buy a computer monitor with a higher resolution than a cell phone screen.

    Keep 'em coming. I'll be reading the reviews on this guy for sure!
    Reply
  • Tewt - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    Refresh rate? 60Hz, 120Hz, etc? Reply
  • Guspaz - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    "If the display is using MST to combine two outputs, that puts the emphasis squarely on two DP 1.2 connections."

    Errm, no, the whole point of MST on DP 1.2 is that you can do it over a single connection/cable, because DP 1.2 can normally do two displays per cable, and MST consumes both of them on a single monitor.
    Reply
  • jeffkibuule - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    While you are correct about the purpose of MST, that only works for monitors around 1080p. At a resolution of 5120x2880, you need two physically separate DP 1.2 connections to make that possible.

    Keep in mind that regardless of the number of monitors connected to a single cable, the bandwidth limit is always fixed.
    Reply
  • Guspaz - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    MST is used for 4K@60Hz monitors on DP 1.2, so I'm not sure where you're getting the 1080p from. Dell's 5K monitor is less than double the total number of pixels of a 4K display, so 5K@30Hz is therefore well below the bandwidth limitations of DP 1.2. Reply
  • naxeem - Saturday, September 06, 2014 - link

    Aside from the fact that no sane person would use anything @30Hz. Reply
  • DanNeely - Saturday, September 06, 2014 - link

    For some uses, eg medical imaging where you're looking at highly detailed static images 30hz is fine. Reply
  • iceman-sven - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    Finally progress!

    And now in 30" 16:10 please. 5120x3200 or jump straight to 8k 7680x4800. And add Adaptive-Sync/G-Sync support. Please bring a proper HiDPI display. I do not want a 28/32" 16:9 3840x2160 display.
    Reply
  • piroroadkill - Friday, September 05, 2014 - link

    30" 5120×3200 would be absolutely perfect. I'd be down for that. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now