Every quarter, Jon Peddie Research analyzes the market for graphics and gives us a chance to see where the industry is at. The market for discrete graphics is seasonal, much like other segments of technology, so it is important to compare them not only to the most previous quarter, but more importantly to the same quarter from last year. Q2 is often a weak time in the discrete graphics industry, and 2014 was no exception. For the quarter, the market for graphics cards dropped 17.5% compared to Q1 even though the desktop PC market actually grew 1.3%. On a year-to-year comparison, the discrete graphics market dropped 17.6%, as compared to the desktop PC market as a while which fell only 1.7%. The seasonal drop was higher than the ten year average.

The total number of Add-in boards (AIBs) shipped in Q2 was 11.5 million units, with AMD decreasing 10.7% from last quarter and NVIDIA decreasing 21%, however overall market share still shows NVIDIA holding strong at 62% compared to 37.9% for AMD. Remember this is for discrete graphics only with AIBs, so we will need to examine more data to get a feel for the entire market.

Discrete Graphics Market
  AMD Matrox NVIDIA S3 Total
Q2 2014 Shipments (Millions) 4.36 0.01 7.13 0.00 11.50
Q1 2014 Shipments (Millions) 4.90 0.00 9.10 0.00 14.00
Q2 2013 Shipments (Millions) 5.32 0.00 8.68 0.00 14.00
Q2 2014 vs Q1 2014 -10.7% flat -21% flat -17.5%
Q2 2014 vs Q2 2013 -18% flat -17.9% -0.1% -17.5%

The attach rate of GPUs including integrated and AIBs was 139% which is up 3.2% from last quarter. 139% may seem too high, but practically all desktop, notebook, and x86 tablets ship with some form of integrated GPU, but many desktops and notebooks also have extra graphics, and some have more than one AIB attached as well, which is why the number is over 100%. 32% of PCs have discrete GPUs which means 68% of PCs sold are relying on integrated graphics.

Looking at the total market for all PCs, the numbers shift quite a bit. Intel, which has all of zero discrete graphics cards for sale, commands an amazing 67.34% of the total GPU market. AMD, who trailed NVIDIA in the discrete GPU market owns 17.94% of the market once you combine in the integrated graphics. NVIDIA, being that they only sell discrete graphics, and based on only 32% of PCs even having discrete graphics, falls to third with 14.72%.

Another data point we can use though would be the Steam Hardware and Software Survey. Steam, with over 75 million users, is far and away the largest gaming network on the planet. Every month, they collect opt-in anonymous data to get a feel for where the gaming industry is at. These kinds of data points would be very useful for developers to get a sense for where they can target the graphical fidelity of their upcoming games in order to hit their target market. On the Steam survey, the GPU manufacturer changes dramatically, with NVIDIA holding 50.93% of the market, Intel falling to 18.89%, and AMD holding the middle ground at 29.8%.

GPU Market
  AMD Intel NVIDIA
All Graphics 17.94% 67.34% 14.72%
Discrete Graphics 37.9% 0% 62.0%
Steam Users 29.8% 18.89% 50.93%

From the data, we can see some interesting trends. Integrated GPUs are unsurprisingly the bulk of the market. Intel is the volume king here, even though their integrated solutions are not as powerful as AMD APUs for graphics, but by the market share it appears that people are choosing CPU power and efficiency over GPU power for most devices. The majority of users who do not play any sort of graphical game can get by on just integrated graphics alone whether they are from AMD or Intel. Once you move to discrete cards, NVIDIA is a 2:1 seller of discrete graphics over the only other rival AMD. The greater than normal drop in AIBs when the PC market actually grew can most likely be attributed to an upswing in business PC sales which seems to be bringing the PC market back for the time being.

Sources:

Jon Peddie Research AIB Market

Jon Peddie Research GPU Market

Steam Hardware & Software Survey

Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Drumsticks - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    67% might use Integrated graphics, but 67% of Anandtech readers don't. The website has always catered to its audience, which is presumably anybody from moderately techie to big tinkerers. I imagine plenty of the people here ARE game fanatics.

    Anyways, they have excellent coverage on both the performance and power perspective of things when it comes to new CPUs (for example). Anandtech has pretty much some of the most full featured reviews when it comes to new devices; what more could you actually want?
  • A5 - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    Yeah, if you want iGPU coverage, that's what PC Magazine is for. Anandtech is an enthusiast site with a specific market.
  • Janooo - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    "NVIDIA is a 2:1 seller of discrete graphics over the only other rival AMD"
    It's closer to 3:2 than to 2:1
  • mpokwsths - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    Didn't know Matrox was still producing graphics cards...
  • cicatriz63 - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    They are still used quite a bit in servers.
  • A5 - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    Well, ~10K units is probably coming from their inventory.

    The real question is how S3 is getting any sales.
  • Mathos - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    "but by the market share it appears that people are choosing CPU power and efficiency over GPU power for most devices."

    Actually having been a retail employee in the past, who's sold PC's etc, it's quite the opposite. People for the most part don't know a damn thing about the hardware in the system. Other than, from commercials they see on TV, which of course we still do the Intel inside thing. Then they go, I want the one with the thing from the TV commercial. Since AMD doesn't counter advertise on tv, people don't know who they are. Hell, for the most part they don't advertise at all, outside of PC magazines. It for the most part, doesn't have a damn thing to do with efficiency or cpu power or igpu power.

    The average person doesn't know that AMD powers all 3 current gen consoles. Now, if current gen consoles were factored in, I wonder how much that would change the numbers, since they're all effectively small form factor pc's now.

    Now, on the AMD v Nvidia front. Again, that comes down to advertising. Every other game you play almost for years, has had Nvidia the way it's meant to be played advertising either on the box, or at the intro of the game. Add on to that, BS spread by people about driver stability, which I can say hasn't been an issue at least since the hd2000 series, since I've owned ati/amd cards since then. During the alternating times, even when AMD/ATI has had a superior product for a long stretch, they still didn't gain much of any market share. The reality with that is, people who've been around long enough, have seen Nvidia on the front end more. Those of us who were around during the Nvidia v 3dfx days for example. Are going to go with the brand that they're most use to, whether they perform better or not.
  • Hrel - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    Q2 2014 vs Q2 2013 -0.1%

    What? AMD Q2 2013 shows 5.32 Million, Q2 2014 shows 4.36 Million. Which is 82% of 5.32 Million. So AMD is down 18%, not .1%. Very confused, and frankly angry at your lack of math ability.

    Nvidia also went down, not up, WTF are you doing?
  • Brett Howse - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    I apologize the numbers I had used for the percentages were from the wrong quarter. All fixed now thanks for letting me know.
  • Mr Perfect - Friday, August 29, 2014 - link

    The greater than normal drop in AIBs when the PC market actually grew can most likely be attributed to an upswing in business PC sales which seems to be bringing the PC market back for the time being.


    It might also be because AMD and Nvidia are still stuck on 28nm and have been releasing a lot of rebadged cards. If you bought a card last year, what is there to upgrade to this year?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now