Random Read/Write Speed

The four corners of SSD performance are as follows: random read, random write, sequential read and sequential write speed. Random accesses are generally small in size, while sequential accesses tend to be larger and thus we have the four Iometer tests we use in all of our reviews.

Our first test writes 4KB in a completely random pattern over an 8GB space of the drive to simulate the sort of random access that you'd see on an OS drive (even this is more stressful than a normal desktop user would see). We perform three concurrent IOs and run the test for 3 minutes. The results reported are in average MB/s over the entire time.

Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Read

Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Write

Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Write (QD=32)

The random performance of XP941 doesn't stand out. Especially random write speeds are quite low by today's standards and queue depth scaling is close to non-existent. That said, I don't believe that high queue depth performance is really important for client workloads as our internal workload analysis shows that even under heavy use the average queue depth tends to be no more than 5. Our Storage Benches also show that even though the random performance isn't excellent, the strong sequential performance thanks to the faster PCIe interface makes up for the difference.

Sequential Read/Write Speed

To measure sequential performance we run a 1 minute long 128KB sequential test over the entire span of the drive at a queue depth of 1. The results reported are in average MB/s over the entire test length.

Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read

The sequential speeds are the highest we have ever tested in a consumer SSD. Even the 8-controller Z-Drive R4 behemoth can't beat the XP941, which really speaks for the efficiency of a single controller design. If you were to increase the queue depth, the Z-Drive would easily beat the XP941 since higher queue depth would increase parallelism and the Z-Drive could take advantage of all of its eight controllers. However, I was able to reach speeds of up to 1560MB/s with the XP941 at queue depth of 32, which is pretty much as fast as you can go with PCIe 2.0 x4 without tweaking any settings (the PCIe bus can be overclocked to achieve even higher speeds, though there can be a negative impact on random performance. We will investigate this at a later date).

Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write

AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Read/Write Performance

The AS-SSD sequential benchmark uses incompressible data for all of its transfers. The result is a pretty big reduction in sequential write speed on SandForce based controllers. The XP941 does brilliantly in AS-SSD as well but now the strength of eight controllers starts to show for the Z-Drive. Even then, the XP941 is still about twice as fast as the fastest SATA 6Gbps SSD.

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 Performance vs Transfer Size
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • jimjamjamie - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    Looking forward to these hitting mainstream, though it will be quite strange plugging storage drives into PCIe slots..
  • Impulses - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    Can't wait for the "is it ok to sandwich this SSD between my two scorching hot R9 290?" posts!
  • pipja - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    rofl can't wait for that day to come, but then it'd be some R1000 980750235 something :p
  • LordOfTheBoired - Friday, May 16, 2014 - link

    Isn't the R1000 980750235 just a rebadged 7770?
  • Antronman - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    Clearly you haven't tested any Fusion iO products.
  • Kristian Vättö - Saturday, May 17, 2014 - link

    Fusion IO doesn't make any drives that are aimed for the client market.
  • snark9a - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    Can I install one in my 2013 rMBP?
  • SirKnobsworth - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    No. Apple uses a proprietary connector so an M.2 SSD won't fit. I believe aftermarket solutions are becoming available though - maybe from OWC?
  • darwinosx - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    Aftermarket solutions for Apple devices have been available for a long time.
  • Penti - Thursday, May 15, 2014 - link

    They still does not have one for PCIe-based Macs.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now