AMD has been relatively silent on the topic of NVIDIA’s variable refresh rate G-Sync technology since its announcement last year. At this year’s CES however, AMD gave me a short demo of its version of the technology.

Using two Toshiba Satellite Click notebooks purchased at retail, without any hardware modifications, AMD demonstrated variable refresh rate technology. According to AMD, there’s been a push to bring variable refresh rate display panels to mobile for a while now in hopes of reducing power consumption (refreshing a display before new content is available wastes power, sort of the same reason we have panel self refresh displays). There’s apparently already a VESA standard for controlling VBLANK intervals. The GPU’s display engine needs to support it, as do the panel and display hardware itself. If all of the components support this spec however, then you can get what appears to be the equivalent of G-Sync without any extra hardware.

In the case of the Toshiba Satellite Click, the panel already supports variable VBLANK. AMD’s display engines have supported variable VBLANK for a couple of generations, and that extends all the way down to APUs. The Satellite Click in question uses AMD’s low cost Kabini APU, which already has the requisite hardware to support variable VBLANK and thus variable display refresh rates (Kaveri as well as AMD's latest GPUs should support it as well). AMD simply needed driver support for controlling VBLANK timing, which is present in the latest Catalyst drivers. AMD hasn’t yet exposed any of the controls to end users, but all of the pieces in this demo are ready and already available.

The next step was to write a little demo app that could show it working. In the video below both systems have V-Sync enabled, but the machine on the right is taking advantage of variable VBLANK intervals. Just like I did in our G-Sync review, I took a 720p60 video of both screens and slowed it down to make it easier to see the stuttering you get with V-Sync On when your content has a variable frame rate. AMD doesn’t want to charge for this technology since it’s already a part of a spec that it has implemented (and shouldn’t require a hardware change to those panels that support the spec), hence the current working name “FreeSync”.

AMD’s demo isn’t quite as nice as NVIDIA’s swinging pendulum, and we obviously weren’t able to test anywhere near as many scenarios, but this one is a good starting point. The system on the left is limited to 30 fps given the heavy workload and v-sync being on, while the system on the right is able to vary its frame rate and synchronize presenting each frame to the display's refresh rate. AMD isn’t ready to productize this nor does it have a public go to market strategy, but my guess is we’ll see more panel vendors encouraged to include support for variable VBLANK and perhaps an eventual AMD driver update that enables control over this function.

In our review I was pretty pleased with G-Sync. I’d be even more pleased if all panels/systems supported it. AMD’s “FreeSync” seems like a step in that direction (and a sensible one too that doesn’t require any additional hardware). If variable VBLANK control is indeed integrated into all modern AMD GPUs, that means the Xbox One and PS4 should also have support for this. Given G-Sync’s sweet spot at between 40 - 60 fps, I feel like “FreeSync” would be a big win for AMD’s APUs.

POST A COMMENT

82 Comments

View All Comments

  • chizow - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    Yes believe it or not, the INTARNETS lets you travel all over the INTARWEBS in a matter of seconds. But yes, been here for years, thanks for the interest. Reply
  • bill5 - Wednesday, January 08, 2014 - link

    Oh, you'll be seeing mantle on the market all too soon for your liking, believe that, LOL. Reply
  • jasonelmore - Tuesday, January 14, 2014 - link

    you realize AMD is like a year late with Kavari? Hindsight is 20/20, and its what AMD does best however by the time they offer a alternative that is OUT RIGHT NOW, its to late, nvidia already has the market share. Reply
  • extide - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    BOOOM G-Sync WHAT? ;) Reply
  • Torashin - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    Hahaha that name is genius! Reply
  • eddman - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    I don't get it. If the feature was already part of the VESA standard, then why nvidia made g-sync?!!
    Weren't they aware that such feature existed?!

    This just doesn't make any sense.
    Reply
  • saneblane - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    Makes perfect sense. Nvidia likes to milk consumers that's all. Reply
  • chizow - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    And AMD likes to make promises only to fail on delivering.

    Hi saneblane :)
    Reply
  • rpsgc - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    Why?

    $$$

    Do you even have to ask?
    Reply
  • JFish222 - Monday, January 06, 2014 - link

    I'd be curious as to how the solutions compare. I assume NVidia thought their solution has added value (the upfront engineering, validation, and ODM marketing costs alone require as much). It could be as simple as NVidia's current card line-up lacks variable VBlank support.

    Anand, would you mind following up on this one? This is an interesting development indeed!
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now