Synology RS10613xs+: 10GbE 10-bay Rackmount NAS Reviewby Ganesh T S on December 26, 2013 3:11 AM EST
- Posted in
Introduction and Setup Impressions
Our enterprise NAS reviews have focused on Atom-based desktop form factor systems till now. These units have enough performance for a moderately sized workgroup and lack some of the essential features in the enterprise space such as acceptable performance with encrypted volumes. A number of readers have mailed in asking for more coverage of the NAS market straddling the high-end NAS and the NAS - SAN (storage area network) hybrid space. Models catering to this space come in the rackmount form factor and are based on more powerful processors such as the Intel Core series or the Xeon series.
Synology's flagship in this space over the last 12 months or so has been the RS10613xs+. Based on the Intel Xeon E3-1230 processor, this 2U rackmount system comes with twelve hot-swappable bays (two of which are dedicated for caching purposes) and 8GB of ECC RAM (expandable to 32 GB). Both SATA and SAS disks in 3.5" as well as 2.5" form factor are supported. In addition to the 10-bays, the unit has also got space for 2x 2.5" drives behind the display module. SSDs can be used in these bays to serve as a cache.
The specifications of the RS10613xs+ are as below:
|Synology RS10613xs+ Specifications|
|Processor||Intel Xeon E3-1230 (4C/8T, 3.2 GHz)|
|RAM||8 GB DDR3 ECC RAM (Upgradable to 32 GB)|
|Drive Bays||10x 3.5"/2.5" SATA / SAS 6 Gbps HDD / SSD + 2x 2.5" SSD Cache Bays|
|Network Links||4x 1 GbE + 2x 10 GbE (Add-on PCIe card)|
|USB Slots||4x USB 2.0|
|SAS Expansion Ports||2x (compatible with RX1213sas)|
|Expansion Slots||2x (10 GbE card occupies one)|
|VGA / Console||Reserved for Maintenance|
|Full Specifications Link||Synology RS10613xs+ Hardware Specs|
Synology is well regarded in the SMB space for the stability as well as wealth of features offered on their units. The OS (DiskStation Manager - DSM) is very user-friendly. We have been following the evolution of DSM over the last couple of years. The RS10613xs+ is the first unit that we are reviewing with DSM 4.x, and we can say with conviction that DSM only keeps getting better.
Our only real complaint about DSM has been the lack of seamless storage pools with the capability to use a single disk across multiple RAID volumes (the type that Windows Storage Spaces provides). This is useful in scenarios with, say, four bay units, where the end user wants some data protected against a single disk failure and some other data protected against failure of two disks. This issue is not a problem with the RS10613xs+, since it has plenty of bays to create two separate volumes in this scenario. In any case, this is a situation more common in the home consumer segment rather than the enterprise segment towards which the RS10613xs+ is targeted.
The front panel has ten 3.5" drive bays arranged in three rows of four bays each. The rightmost column has a two-row / one-column wide LCM display panel with buttons to take care of administrative tasks. This panel can be pulled out to reveal the two caching SSD bays. On the rear side, we have redundant power supplies (integrated 1U PSUs of 400W each), a console and VGA port (not suggested for use by the end consumer), 4x USB 2.0 ports, 4x 1Gb Ethernet ports (all natively on the unit's motherboard) and two SAS-out expansion ports to connect up to 8 RX1213sas expansion units. There is also space for a half-height PCIe card, and it was outfitted with a dual 10 GbE SFP+ card in our review unit.
On the software side, not much has changed with respect to the UI in DSM 4.x compared to the older versions. There is definitely a more polished look and feel. For example, we have drag and drop support while configuring disks in different volumes. These types of minor improvements tend to contribute to a better user experience all around. The setup process is a breeze, with the unit's configuration page available on the network even in diskless mode. As the gallery below shows, the unit comes with a built-in OS which can be installed in case the unit / setup computer is not connected to the Internet / Synology's servers. A Quick Start Wizard prompts the user to create a volume to start using the unit.
An interesting aspect of the Storage Manager is the SSD Cache for boosting read performance. Automatic generation of file access statistics on a given volume helps in deciding the right amount of cache that might be beneficial to the system. Volumes are part of RAID groups. All volumes in a given RAID group are at the same RAID level. In addition, the storage manager also provides for configuration of iSCSU LUNs / targets and management of the disk drives (S.M.A.R.T and other similar disk-specific aspects).
RAID expansions / migrations as well as rebuilds are handled in the storage manager too. The other interesting aspect is the Network section. In the gallery above, one can see that it is possible to bond all the 6 network ports together in 802.3ad dynamic link aggregation mode. SSH access is available (as in older DSM versions). A CLI guide to work on the RAID groups / volumes in a SSH session would be a welcome complementary feature to the excellent web UI.
In the rest of this review, we will talk about our testbed setup, present results from our evaluation of single client performance with CIFS and NFS shares as well as iSCSI LUNs. Encryption support is also evaluated for CIFS shares. A section on performance with Linux clients will also be presented. Multi-client performance is evaluated using IOMeter on CIFS shares. In the final section we talk about power consumption, RAID rebuild durations and other miscellaneous aspects.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
JayJ - Friday, December 27, 2013 - linkIn at least 2 of the links it is stated that when a RAID 5 rebuild is in process and a URE is encountered, all data is lost.
I'm not sure what crap hardware that author has been using. When a URE is encountered during a rebuild the rebuild halts and you're back where you started - with a degraded array.
Now I'm not saying "RAID 5 is the BEST!" but the "facts" presented are false.
FYI I've rebuilt several hundred RAID 5 arrays over the last 15 years and have experienced a URE during rebuild exactly 2 times. You can cut down on UREs by performing a scheduled "Patrol Read" or functional equivalent. There is no way to know if the data is readable unless you read it. You can have a (fictional) "SUPER DUPER RAID 3000" with a ridiculous amount of redundancy but it's still theoretically possible to lose your data due to URE unless it's read and verified.
Computer Bottleneck - Saturday, December 28, 2013 - linkHow do you feel about drives like the Western Digital Re which has a URE spec of 10^15 compared to other drives with a URE spec of 10^14 in RAID 5?
802.11at - Friday, December 27, 2013 - linkGiven the choice, I'll take RAID 10 all day in my enterprise environment.
802.11at - Friday, December 27, 2013 - linkBut FWIW, our HP LeftHand SAN is comprised of 6 nodes with 8 HDDs each in RAID 5 with the volumes actually running on a networked RAID 10.
theangryintern - Monday, December 30, 2013 - linkNice try, guy who writes for smbitjournal
Brutalizer - Wednesday, January 1, 2014 - linkThe second link is quite wrong in the premises. It says that filesystems are really reliable today, well, they are not. There are lot of research showing how all filesystems are flawed today (except ZFS) with respect to data corruption protection. Only ZFS protects the data against data corruption. Read the research papers you will find here:
tomdb - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - linkHow much are consumer grade (if any exist) 10 GbE NAS's, switches and PCIe cards?
bobbozzo - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - link$3000 for a 6-bay Netgear w 10gigE
bobbozzo - Thursday, December 26, 2013 - linkI don't think there are any 'consumer' 10gb switches yet.
Master_shake_ - Saturday, December 28, 2013 - linkinfiniband is getting cheaper in price