When Microsoft introduced its first Surface devices last year, it did so in a staggered fashion. Surface RT showed up first, then four months later Surface Pro went on sale. Despite sharing a lot of the same DNA, the response to Surface Pro was much better than what we saw with Surface RT. While Surface RT suffered a lot from being a new platform that lacked the support of decades of Windows applications, Surface Pro had no such issue.

Instead, Surface Pro offered the promise of a tablet that could potentially replace your notebook and desktop as well. Microsoft’s strategy with Surface Pro mimicked the market transition we saw years earlier. The notebooks that replaced desktops over the 2000s did so by being able to work as both notebooks or desktops. Similarly, Microsoft hoped that Surface Pro could act as both a tablet and a notebook for those users who didn’t want to carry two devices.

By and large, Microsoft was successful in achieving that vision. Although as with all devices that attempt to fulfill multiple roles, Surface Pro presented a set of tradeoffs. It wasn’t as portable and didn’t last as long on a single charge as a conventional ARM based tablet. It also didn’t have the same keyboard or in-lap experience as a PC notebook. You got a compromised experience on both sides of the fence. Just as with Surface 2, Microsoft is committed to a more aggressive update cadence to its Surface Pro hardware as well. Here we are, almost 9 months since availability of the original Surface Pro, reviewing its successor.

Unlike Surface 2, Surface Pro 2 shows almost no signs of change on the outside. It reminds me of the pre-iPhone/iPad era where expecting a dramatic chassis redesign a year after introduction was considered ludicrous. Surface Pro 2 keeps the exact same finish, dimensions and weight as the original Surface Pro.

It’s unfortunate given how much thinner and lighter the device could be this time around. I suspect Microsoft has a three year plan for Surface Pro. It could move to a thinner design this year and drop performance by going to a 6W Haswell SKU, keep performance the same but pay a thermal penalty with a 15W Haswell or wait until Broadwell next year to shrink the chassis (hopefully without much of an associated performance reduction). I can understand why Microsoft chose the latter, it’s still just frustrating as I would’ve loved a thinner/lighter Surface Pro.

I also lament Microsoft’s decision to update the VaporMg finish on Surface 2 but not on Surface Pro 2. I really like the new finish both in feel and in color. Surface 2’s resistance to picking up fingerprints is an added bonus on that front. Alas, it’s an update that I’m guessing the Surface Pro lineup won’t get until next year.

Surface Pro 2 also retains the same front and rear facing cameras as its predecessor, both 1.2MP units and it doesn’t get the new 3.5/5MP sensors from Surface 2.

You still get a bundled Wacom active digitizer with Surface Pro 2, just like with the original. I’m hardly a creative professional, but from what I’ve experienced with the pen it’s really a great addition for those folks who are. I’ll point you at none other than Gabe from Penny Arcade who did a great post on an artist’s perspective of using the Surface Pro’s stylus. Spoiler alert: he likes it a lot. If I illustrated for a living, I probably would too.

Surface Pro 2 inherits the same kickstand and branding decisions as Surface 2. As I mentioned in my Surface 2 review, the new 2-stage kickstand is awesome and a huge improvement over its predecessor. The kickstand now opens at 24 and 40-degree angles, the latter enables more comfortable use when you’re not typing at a desk. The new kickstand also ditches the Windows 8 logo in favor of the Surface logo across the back.

Finally, Surface Pro 2 does get the new 1080p panel from Surface 2 (albeit a brighter implementation). There’s no improvement in resolution compared to the original Surface Pro, but color accuracy is a lot better. 

I did notice an odd display corruption issue on Surface Pro 2 when waking up from sleep (pictured above). Resetting the device or sometimes just doing another sleep/wake cycle was enough to fix it. Microsoft tells me it’s aware of the problem and plans to issue an update shortly to address it. We only got review samples a few days prior to the NDA lift, I get the impression that it was a lot of work to get final hardware out the door in time for this launch. Update: Microsoft traced the issue back to a later revision of an Intel graphics driver. After release, a Surface Pro 2 update rolled back to an earlier optimized driver that no longer exhibits the display corruption on wake issue.

Internally we see where Microsoft spent most of its time updating Surface Pro. It all starts with an upgrade to Haswell. Surface Pro 2 features Intel’s Core i5-4200U, a dual-core 1.6GHz 15W Haswell part with Hyper Threading, 3MB of shared L3 cache, and a max turbo frequency of 2.6GHz. Just like last time, I had no issues hitting 2.6GHz on Surface Pro 2. I would see 2.3GHz far more frequently however.

As Surface Pro 2 is rather thick by Ultrabook standards, you get the full performance of the 4200U. I ran a multithreaded Cinebench 11.5 test on Surface Pro 2, comparing it to Apple’s 13-inch 2013 MacBook Air under Windows 8. The two deliver identical performance, just in different form factors:

Cinebench 11.5 - Multi-Threaded

The 4200U is nearly identical to the base CPU you get in the new 2013 MacBook Airs, the only difference being that you get Intel’s HD 4400 graphics vs. HD 5000. Apple’s obsession with graphics performance explains the difference, although it’s disappointing to see Microsoft not sharing the same obsession. To Microsoft’s credit the difference between Intel’s HD 5000 and HD 4400, when constrained by a 15W TDP, just isn’t very large. The real benefit to going with HD 5000 over HD 4400 has to do with power consumption, since you can get similar performance at lower frequencies/voltages thanks to a doubling of the number of EUs in HD 5000.

It’s not just the CPU that’s changed this time around, Microsoft did extensive work under the hood of Surface Pro 2 to further reduce power consumption. Haswell ULT supports LPDDR3, a feature that Microsoft chose to take advantage of in pursuit of lowering power consumption. All other components on the motherboard are also optimized for power consumption. The result is a device that looks like and is cooled similarly to its predecessor, but is appreciably cooler/quieter in operation. While the original Surface Pro would spin its fans up on a regular basis, Surface Pro 2 is far more hesitant to do the same thing. In what I’d consider to be light to medium tablet use, Surface Pro 2 behaves like a passively cooled device. When the fans do ramp up, they aren’t any louder than before as far as I can tell.


USB3 transfers to an internal mSATA SSD

Just like the original, Surface Pro 2 retains a full SSD rather than an eMMC solution. We’re still dealing with an mSATA based drive here, but Microsoft expanded the available capacity options. The combination of DRAM/SSD/price options are in the table below:

Microsoft Surface Pro 2 Storage Configurations
SSD 64GB 128GB 256GB 512GB
LPDDR3 Configuration 4GB 4GB 8GB 8GB
Price $899 $999 $1299 $1799

The most interesting options are unfortunately the more expensive models. I think the sweet spot is likely the 8GB/256GB version, which also happens to be how my review sample was configured. Unfortunately the LPDDR3 is soldered on board (as with all modern Ultrabooks) so that’s not user upgradeable. The SSD is technically serviceable, but there’s a ton of risk associated with doing so as you have to take apart your Surface Pro 2 to do so. Once again Microsoft refuses to equip Surface Pro with a Thunderbolt port, which would help greatly in dealing with high performance storage expansion concerns. There is still a USB 3.0 port at least.

Surface Pro 2 is compatible with all of the new dock accessories, including the new touch and type covers. I went through the improvements to both of those in our Surface 2 review already, but in short they are great. I still prefer the new type cover as I can type a lot faster on it, but the new touch cover is significantly better than its predecessor. Neither is included in the cost of a Surface Pro 2, so factor in another $119 - $129 depending on which cover you end up with. I noticed the same trackpad disappearing issues on Surface Pro 2 as I did on Surface 2, Microsoft claims a fix is in the works.

Microsoft Surface Pro Comparison
  Surface Pro 2 Surface Pro
Dimensions 10.81 x 6.81 x 0.53" 10.81 x 6.81 x 0.53"
Display 10.6-inch 1920 x 1080 w/ Improved Color Accuracy 10.6-inch 1920 x 1080 PLS
Weight 2.0 lbs 2.0 lbs
Processor Core i5-4200U with HD4400 Graphics (15W Haswell ULT)

Core i5-3317U with HD4000 Graphics (17W Ivy Bridge)

Cameras 1.2MP/1.2MP (front/rear) 1.2MP/1.2MP (front/rear)
Connectivity WiFi WiFi
Memory 4GB or 8GB LPDDR3 4GB
Storage 64 or 128GB (4GB RAM)
256GB or 512GB (8GB RAM)
64GB or 128GB
Battery 42.0 Wh 42.0 Wh
Starting Price $899 $799

Surface Pro 2 ships with Windows 8.1 Pro x64. Since there's no connected standby 64-bit version of Windows 8/8.1 yet, Surface Pro 2 ships without the feature. It also continues to behave more notebook like in the sleep/wake sense as a result. There's a delay between when you press the power/lock button and when you'll see the tablet respond as the system comes out of its sleep state. Ironically Surface Pro 2 comes with nothing more than a link to try Office 2013, while Surface 2 comes with a free copy of the Home & Student edition.

Display
POST A COMMENT

277 Comments

View All Comments

  • HisDivineOrder - Monday, October 21, 2013 - link

    I think the Razer tablet might be a bit more focused than Microsoft is with Surface Pro. It seems like internally they bet on the Surface RT line for some reason and are shocked that the Pro line is the one that most want.

    I think they're leaving money on the table not making a Surface with Bay Trail.
    Reply
  • AbbyYen - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    is it only me or, why I feel all these review are Microsoft paid review. The device is out there for quite some time and only today that all those reviewer sites suddenly decide to post a review on the same day. ps: It's Apple new product announcement day.

    and don't get me wrong, Amand's review has always been very very informative. but I dislike the idea of occupationize reviewing. I mean how hard can it be to find USD300 to buy and review it yourself? if you can't, ask shops to sponsor a unit and by return give them a free advertise. if all fails, auction it and a slight increase price, cause you have more fan base to support it. and also the advertisement income from website. it is tedious but that's what make the review more neutral.

    paid reviewer will always biased. And please shut m$oft door cause they've been good previously but now they want to shove and force you to eat win8. all these time they're backward compatible. Vista time, you can install xp, in 7, you can install xp, Vista. now? no option. you must die.

    I'm in the transition to buy many machine to replace. win8 is a pain to use. and all those ultrabook are ultra easy to break. useless stuff. precision are great device with great warranty but It's too high a cost for the time being.
    Reply
  • YakubuL - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    You got the idea of how tech blogs work wrong. For big launches like this, there is usually a review embargo for all websites. You also have to consider that Microsoft might have shipped out the devices for reviewing all at the same time Reply
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    you sound like you are being paid by Apple.

    MBA is an ultrabook. are you saying it breaks easily?
    Reply
  • AbbyYen - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    ok, sorry about the last rage. I can always go to clevo or other OEM to custom made everything. but price will be very high. maybe I'll wait for next or else explore other option. ubuntu, droid, all support custom made software. not a big deal.

    now back to the article. This thing won't replace notebook in the near future. too fragile. no real keyboard, battery suck, it'll fail within a year. it's only good for our sales booth where only simple input are required. Heck, on our testing periods, they prefer the iPad more. the only best thing about this is the remote desktop or server thingy.

    the m$oft idea of putting office to clouds are stupid move. why would I share my info when I got my own server. and local storage is still the fastest access. cellular data are not stable. I understand that in the next future, all your device will only be a client but I really dislike that idea. client concept in an office is acceptable thou, investment wide It's still better. but when you are out there, you'll need to pay service provider for band with. this suck.
    Reply
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    Nothing, absolutely nothing is more expensive than MBA spec vs spec Reply
  • InspectHerGadget - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    You know the Surface is sexy. I've thought about it and that is it really. It is unique. It isn't as good as a notebook as a notebook like an MBA and not as good a tablet as an iPad but it does both and really there has to be some compromise. It does both well and it is unique (OK I said that twice but there are a million laptops around). Reply
  • WP7Mango - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    I don't think you understand how cloud-Office works. You don't have to store your data in the cloud. You can store all your data locally if you wish. You have the option of saving your data to the cloud, or syncing it via the cloud, but nobody is forcing you to do that. If you want to store your data locally, then you can do so, no problem at all. Reply
  • duploxxx - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    if the software is optimised you don't need all this horse power in this device. Guess what they own the SW, it isn't optimised hence the reason why they stick to higher end parts to make it smooth = higher cost and bad power consumption. In stead they would better focus on SW optimisation, that would help xxxxxxx users. Reply
  • Welgudtor - Tuesday, October 22, 2013 - link

    "sharing a lot of the same DNA" ? I didn't realise a tablet was a animal. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now