NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Review: The $400 Fight
by Ryan Smith on May 30, 2013 9:00 AM ESTBattlefield 3
Our final multiplayer action game of our benchmark suite is Battlefield 3, DICE’s 2011 multiplayer military shooter. Its ability to pose a significant challenge to GPUs has been dulled some by time and drivers, but it’s still a challenge if you want to hit the highest settings at the highest resolutions at the highest anti-aliasing levels. Furthermore while we can crack 60fps in single player mode, our rule of thumb here is that multiplayer framerates will dip to half our single player framerates, so hitting high framerates here may not be high enough.
GTX 770 is going to struggle with BF3 at 2560 with everything turned up, but dropping down to 1920 is enough to get the average framerate well above 60fps, and consequently the minimum framerates should be well above 30fps too. In this case this is another game NVIDIA traditionally excels at, leading to a 15% performance advantage over the 7970GE. The gains against the GTX 680 are far more muted at just 6% - indicating that we’re not seeing much of a benefit from more memory bandwidth – while it’s another very big step up from the GTX 570 at 83%.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
117 Comments
View All Comments
LoccOtHaN - Friday, May 31, 2013 - link
True Bro ;-) AMD is more user friendly, but when Next-Gen on ATI/AMD comes PS4 and M$ XBx1 then all optimalisation will be AMD friendly and DX11.1 (DX11.x or Full DX11) and we won !whyso - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
Well looks like the 7970 ghz has been tied. Lower price is nice but almost no OC headroom (wouldn't be surprised if AT got a cherry picked sample) and no game bundle. Similar power consumption too. Performance increase is virtually 0 but the price decrease is nice.A5 - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
Worth pointing out that you can pretty easily get the AMD bundle codes for ~$30 on eBay. It wipes out the price advantage, but it does let you weigh the cards on the merits of their hardware.steve_rogers42 - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
Think there is an error on page 7,"Of course this is only a 9% increase in the GPU clockspeed, which is going to pale in comparison to parts like GTX 670 and GTX 780, each of which can do 20%+ due to their lower clockspeeds. So there’s some overclocking headroom in GTX 780, but as to be expected not a ton."
Last sentence should read GTX 770 yea?
Great article, good to see nvidia's progress with the GPU boost 2 and taking on-board the tdp/power issue that the 600 series seems to have had. It will be interesting to see what they make of the 760 and what it will contain.
Cheers,
nathanddrews - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
Wow... at worst it is equal with the 680 for $100 less. At best, it is tied with the 780 for $250 less. I think NVIDIA needs to reexamine their pricing model - I'm sure the market will fix it for them. Either the 770 is too cheap or the 780 is way too expensive. (signs point to the latter)shompa - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
GTX 780 die is huge. It costs Nvidia almost double to manufacture a 780GTX then a 770/680 die.Only if Nvidia have enough harvested defect dies from Tesla chips they could/would lower the price on GTX 780.
EJS1980 - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
If the 780 performs better than the 680 by 30-35% out the gate w/ crappy day1 drivers (future updates will only increase that advantage), how exactly is it tied with the 770?nathanddrews - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
How exactly is it tied? Like I said, at its best.http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/829?vs=827
770 and 780 tied (within +/-5%):
DiRT: Showdown - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + 4xMSAA
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + Normal AA
Battlefield 3 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality + FXAA-High
Compute: Civilization V
Compute: Sony Vegas Pro 12 Video Render
Synthetic: 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill
EJS1980 - Thursday, May 30, 2013 - link
Your link shows the 780 with a pretty substantial performance advantage, save for a couple instances. I stand by my comment.nathanddrews - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link
It's easy to stand by your comment if you completely ignore what I wrote and ignore the facts. For instance, the 680 was not tested with "crappy day1 drivers", it was tested with very recent 320.14 drivers while the 770/780 used 320.18. In addition, I never said that the 770 was always tied with the 780, I said "at its best", which means that at the high end it ties the 780 in some benchmarks. At its worst, on the low end, the 770 is tied with the 680 in some benchmarks. I hope that clarifies things for you.