Workstation Performance

While the PCMarks and some video encoding may favor an SSD-based system (though the 15K RPM Seagate Savvio in our review unit is no slouch), the SPEC workstation benchmarks should pretty aggressively favor Lenovo's solution as the NVIDIA Quadro 5000 and dual octalcore Xeons are the highest specced parts we've yet tested.

SPECviewperf 11 (catia-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (ensight-04)

SPECviewperf 11 (lightwave-01)

SPECviewperf 11 (maya-03)

SPECviewperf 11 (proe-05)

SPECviewperf 11 (sw-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (tcvis-02)

SPECviewperf 11 (snx-01)

Any test the D30 doesn't win, it basically ties, and when it does win it often wins big. The tcvis-02 test seems to be workstation GPU dependent, and proe-05 and lightwave-01 both seem to favor the slightly faster top clock speed on the Xeon E3-1280 v2, which is able to take one core up to 4GHz; both benches are definitely banking on single-threaded performance as the major differentiator. The combination of 150W of GF100 GPU power and 300W of Xeon cores certainly gets the job done, though.

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Interactive)

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Render)

SPECapc Lightwave 3D 9.6 (Multitask)

Interestingly, while SPECapc Lightwave definitely sees gains from the additional eight cores, they're a little more subdued. The D30 is definitely shaving whole minutes off of the running time compared to the Z420's single E5-2687W, but the extra cores just aren't as pronounced as they are in some of the SPECviewperf tests.

Application and Futuremark Performance Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

68 Comments

View All Comments

  • Haribol - Monday, November 26, 2012 - link

    Shop around on eBay, Google, Amazon for the best deals. Never pay retail !!!
    I bought a Brand New System on eBay for 50% off lenovo.com's website. Same system at Lenovo.com was close to $15,000 without taxes and fees. I bought it for $4200 dual xeon 2650, 5 SSD Drives (LENOVO Drives) and 64GB Factory ECC 1600mhz Memory and mid-range Quadro. So please don't get ripped off by paying factory pricing. Search on Google, Amazon, Ebay for the best deals.

    Hope this helps.
  • icuimp - Saturday, November 17, 2012 - link

    Just thought i would point out a Sandforce based SSD is not suited for video encoding especially a slow 60GB model.

    SSD was probably holding back the encoding results due to slow transfer rates (~60MB/sec write speeds).

    Try something non sandforce based and retest please!
  • Oscarcharliezulu - Saturday, November 17, 2012 - link

    I haven't used a real workstation class PC since the Dell I had in 2000 (remember rdram?), but it was truly awesome, internal design alone made it worth the money. I've had a dozen PC's but that is the one I remember most. Man was it stable and fast. This article made me nostalgic for it, so thanks.
  • Wixman666 - Sunday, November 18, 2012 - link

    In the future, it would be nice to see how these multi thousand dollar workstations compare to a single CPU overclocked enthusiast box with a high end video card.

    An i5 3570k or 3700k at 4.6+ and a geforce 670 or 680 just so we can get some perspective. Pretty sure that it would be middle of the pack and at 10% of the cost.

    I see that you have a puget in there with the i5 2500k, but it has the on chip video. That's a pretty worthless addition to the charts when we're talking about high end graphics workstation performance.
  • alpha754293 - Monday, November 19, 2012 - link

    ....and the SSDs that ARE rated for enterprise usage puts another $2000 or so on top of the cost of a $10k system.

    That's why they don't use SSDs.

    The plus side though - if it did - the SSD might be a PCIe card rather than SATA 6 Gbps.

    I would have LOVE to have seen some HPC benchmarks performed on this system in order to figure out what it's real performance would be like.

    And 16 GB of RAM for a system like this is really nothing. Considering that you can get Alienwares now with that much RAM...*shrug*...

    (The most memory I've used is somewhere around 96 GB range...on a system that had 128 GB.)
  • dtolios - Monday, November 19, 2012 - link

    Modern games have little to do with cores...very few of them will care for the 8-threads a 2600K/3770K has to offer over a 2500K/3570K. In case some should (happens in some cases and extreme resolutions, Tri-Quad SLI and the works), a 3930K would beat most Xeons (1P, 2P, 10P - w/e).

    Single threaded performance is still very important in most fields. CAD, CG and video editing included.
    Again, fast i7s (and sometimes fast i5s) will beat Xeons due to faster clocks. Add O/C to make multithreaded performance of a s2011 hex-i7 unrivaled even by mid-range 2P systems.

    16GB of RAM and 60GB SSDs are a joke - period. So are the monies asked to upgrade them (over market prices) when building to order such workstations by Lenovo, Dell, HP etc.

    Ppl that believe that 2P is a limiting factor, think again: which Windows OS distribution you think allows you utilize more than 2P systems? Def. not Win 7 64bit ;-)
  • Haribol - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link

    I saw one for sale on eBay. Which has 4 X Lenovo SSD Drives and 2TB. Has 64GB of memory. I might just give an offer to that guy see how much he takes. I used the D20 and I really like these machines. They are not pretty like the dells but they are rock solid.

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/230858459957

    How much you think that is worth?
  • Haribol - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link

    Why DDR3-1333 memory. The ones I have been looking on CDW and Ebay say it comes with 1600 Memory.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now