More to Come, So Stay Tuned

Wrapping up the first part of our review of the FirePro W9000 and W8000, we’ve taken a look at the specifications of the new FirePro W series, along with looking at the impact of Graphics Core Next for professional graphics, and how all of this fits together in AMD’s larger plans. AMD’s big goal remains to capture a much larger share of the lucrative professional graphics market from NVIDIA in order to break out of the sub-20% rut they’ve been in for some time. To do that they not only need to deliver solid hardware at a reasonable price, but also exceptionally solid drivers, and major industry partnerships that will advance the state of professional graphics applications and help AMD counter NVIDIA’s strong marketing message at the same time.

Later this week we’ll be publishing our second part of this review, focusing on building a professional graphics test suite and the resulting benchmarks. It goes without saying that benchmarking professional cards comes with quite a few quirks, less so because of the hardware and more because of the typical programs. A typical professional graphics application looks, acts, and renders nothing like a game – in particular shaders are sparingly used – which means that performance bottlenecks are in entirely different places.

This actually poses a recurring problem for the professional graphics industry, since compute/shader performance has been growing by leaps and bounds, while raw texture and pixel throughput has been much more modest. This reflects the consumer market where games are primarily investing in shader effects and 1080P has been a staple resolution for quite some time, but it means that many professional applications aren’t directly tapping much of a modern GPU’s capabilities since shaders aren’t heavily used. Instead some professional applications can tap those resources through the use of compute, which is part of the reason why AMD and NVIDIA both invest in projects that increase the use of compute in the professional graphics market.

Anyhow, we’ll have more on the performance of the FirePro W series later this week with our follow-up article. So until then stay tuned.

R.I.P: FireStream (2006 - 2012)


View All Comments

  • ManuelLP - Thursday, August 30, 2012 - link

    When is publish the second part? Tomorrow is the end of the month. Reply
  • Gadgety - Wednesday, December 19, 2012 - link

    This very interesting part I was done back in August. It's now December. I've searched for W9000 on Anandtech but no part II shows up. What gives? Reply
  • nitro912gr - Friday, January 18, 2013 - link

    Where is PART 2? Reply
  • theprofessionalschoice - Thursday, December 5, 2013 - link

    As an entrepreneur in Bitcoin mining, I have made roughly $1.7m. from a start-up fund of only $40,000. I can personally vouch for the W9000 cards because I've mined with them exclusively and now happily manage a small empire because of their vast throughput. Kudos to the author for going so in-depth with this review... VERY accurate and I highly recommend this card to miners of any level... I can't wait for the 20nm dual-chips to launch (exclusively in the new Mac Pro) sometime this month!!! Great professional cards - NOT for consumers! ;) Reply
  • ballsystemlord - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - link

    I guess we'll never see part 2... :(
    Really, I am curious.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now