Metro: 2033

Paired with Crysis as our second behemoth FPS is Metro: 2033. Metro gives up Crysis’ lush tropics and frozen wastelands for an underground experience, but even underground it can be quite brutal on GPUs, which is why it’s also our new benchmark of choice for looking at power/temperature/noise during a game. If its sequel due this year is anywhere near as GPU intensive then a single GPU may not be enough to run the game with every quality feature turned up.

Metro is another graphically intensive game and another game that has traditionally favored AMD’s 7000 series cards, albeit not to nearly the same degree as Crysis. Still, the 7970 could already surpass the GTX 680 here and the 7970GE adds to that lead. At 2560 the 7970GE takes a 12% lead, pushing past 40fps at 2560. Meanwhile AMD’s gains compared to the 7970 are less pronounced but it’s still enough for an 8% improvement. Like Crysis this is another game where AMD has a very clear performance advantage with the 7970GE.

Crysis: Warhead DiRT 3
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • AnnihilatorX - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    "All the same AMD has also boosted their memory clocks from 5.5GHz to 6GHz, which will give the card 9% more memory bandwidth with it needs it."
    =>
    "when it needs it"
  • raghu78 - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    Ryan
    As you mentioned Dirt Showdown will take the place of Dirt 3 in your test suite I would like to make a suggestion that a few more games be changed. Max Payne 3 and Alan Wake are good changes. Maybe Crysis Warhead could be replaced by Alan Wake and Portal 2 by Max Payne 3. Another very demanding game which could find a place is Witcher 2 Enhanced edition. Focusing on games released in the last 12 months in your test suite helps prospective buyers / gamers decide based on performance on recent titles which they will most probably be playing.
  • HighTech4US - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    You are showing the OCed version of the 7970e in comparison to the stock GTX680.

    For fairness the stock GTX680 should be Overclocked also.
  • kyuu - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    There's nothing fair or unfair about overclocking. Why do people bring this up every time there's one of these articles...
  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, June 23, 2012 - link

    Good to hear it this time, as all the prior moaning has been amd fans wailing that the 680 core is already overclocked out of the box !
    L M H O

    I just want to see the 470, 480, 570, and 580 at the equivalent radeon clocks for those series, and see amd get SPANKED even more in those series.... to be fair, of course....

    Yes, thanks so much for saying "you guys always say it" - no - it's not "you guys" - it's the amd fan boys !

    This time they didn't moan and complain about fairness, because amd got beat anyway, and they wouldn't if it won, which it did not, I must point out, feeling the overwhelming need to state, again, and again.

    This sums it up well: AMD loses, as usual

  • seapeople - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    They're also comparing the OCed version of the 7970e to the stock 7970e. That seems unfair to me. To be fair, you should only compare the OCed 7970e to itself, the OCed 7970e.
  • Arbie - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link


    It's probably too late now, but there were at least three more places where you could have used "performance crown" in the opening paragraphs.
  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, June 23, 2012 - link

    Amd LIED, with their false advertising about this card - their hot loud slow housefire...

    Amd is an evil corporate monster who lies to the little children they sell their products to (and to soccer Mommies who actually pay the card price to keep the lies going - granted they pay less than Abu Dhabi oil sheiks)
  • Wreckage - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    Another successful paperlaunch

    I'm not sure why they could not wait until they had actual product available.
  • behrouz - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition = $499
    AMD Radeon HD 7970 = $549 ? or $449 ?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now