Crysis: Warhead

Kicking things off as always is Crysis: Warhead. It’s no longer the toughest game in our benchmark suite, but it’s still a technically complex game that has proven to be a very consistent benchmark. Thus even four years since the release of the original Crysis, “but can it run Crysis?” is still an important question, and the answer continues to be “no.” While we’re closer than ever, full Enthusiast settings at a 60fps is still beyond the grasp of a single-GPU card.

Since the launch of the GTX 680 it’s been clear that Crysis is a game that favors AMD’s products and this is no clearer than with the 7970GE. AMD was already handily beating the GTX 680 here, most likely due to the GTX 680’s more limited memory bandwidth – so the faster 7970GE widens that gap even further. The 7970GE is a full 25% faster than the GTX 680 here at 2560 and is extremely close to hitting 60fps at 1920, which given Crysis’s graphically demanding nature is quite incredible, and for all practical purposes puts the 7970GE in its own category. Obviously this is one of AMD’s best games, but it’s solid proof that the 7970GE can really trounce the GTX 680 in the right situation.

As for the 7970GE versus the 7970, this is a much more straightforward comparison. We aren’t seeing the full extent of the 7970GE’s clockspeed advantage over the 7970 here, but the 7970GE is still at the lower bounds of its theoretical performance advantage over its lower clocked sibling with a gain of 8% at 2560. The 7970GE is priced some 16% higher than the 7970 so the performance gains aren’t going to keep pace with the price increases, but this is nothing new for flagship cards.

When it comes to minimum framerates the 7970GE further expands its lead. It’s now 35% faster than the GTX 680 (and just short of 30fps) at 2560, which neatly wraps up the 7970GE’s domination in Crysis. Even its performance lead versus the 7970 improves, with the 7970GE increasing its lead to 13%. A year ago NVIDIA and AMD were roughly tied with Crysis, but now AMD has clearly made it their game. So can it run Crysis? Yes, and a lot better than the GTX 680 can.

Dueling Drivers, A PR Do-Over, & The Test Metro: 2033
POST A COMMENT

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, June 23, 2012 - link

    They can justify it, the are the amd fanboy. Ever DOLLAR counts when it comes to card pricing, five or ten bucks makes amd the WINNER !!!!!!!! and greatest card value ever for enthusiasts !!!!!!!!!!!

    But then, moments later, the nearly unavailable and much more expensive montior is all theirs, at their bosom (moments before they harped amd wins in high rez triple screen no matter the data) - now suddenly they have a 1920x1200 IPS or whatever...

    Here's why...

    1920x1080: " GeForce GTX680 is on average 17.61% more efficient than the Radeon 7970.
    Here, the performance difference in favor of the GTX680 are even greater "

    1920x1200: " GeForce GTX680 is on average 10.14% more efficient than the Radeon 7970.
    At slightly higher resolution appears to have slightly worse performance of the new card (compared to 1920x1080). "

    That's an over 7% performance difference overall... nVidia still kicks amd's lousy second placer, but it's not SO embarrassing at 17%+....

    See, now they all love 1920x1200 and will DEMAND as hyper-harpies that anand keep the monitor rez as is...

    In the end it will just be anand "listening" to it's fan base.... R O F L

    Dude, they COULD just run their 1920x1200 in 1920x1080 for the benches - it's not hard at all - but you know... amd doesn't look better than crappy as heck then..
    Reply
  • CeriseCogburn - Saturday, June 23, 2012 - link

    link (since the descending swarm won't see it above)

    http://translate.google.pl/translate?hl=pl&sl=...
    Reply
  • silverblue - Monday, June 25, 2012 - link

    I couldn't care less which it is as long as the image is good. I do think you're downplaying the framerate advantage of 1080p over 1200p though as we're talking an extra 11% screen area going from one to the other.

    1200p used to be far more common and Apple are one of the manufacturers keeping it alive (along with 4:3 ratios).
    Reply
  • Ananke - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    Real good dudes use 1920*1200 Reply
  • silverblue - Monday, June 25, 2012 - link

    Nah. With a card like these, I'd rather use 2560xwhatever. :P Reply
  • Zok - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    Maybe I missed it in the article, but does the lack of hardware changes mean that existing 7970s can be "upgraded" by being flashed with a 7970GE BIOS (so long as they can hit the clock speeds)? Reply
  • haukionkannel - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    No it can not be upgraded... So what else has been changed?

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970...
    Reply
  • Zok - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    Well that's disappointing. Wonder if there are hardware changes or a workaround is possible. Reply
  • haukionkannel - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    You said that you may use some extra setting for Scyrim... How about using some popular extra large texturemap upgrade? It would be more punishing to use those larger texturemaps, and In Scyrim, like Oblivion before, those texturemaps are guitep popular among users of more poverfull graphic cards! Reply
  • milkod2001 - Friday, June 22, 2012 - link

    7950/70 games+computing /trade off :noise+power less efficient
    670/80 games/trade off:weak in computing

    the only card I find as a good choice would be 670 but it needs to get to 300-350 price level
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now