As with all things in life, the job of reviewing a product spans a spectrum of options. At one end of the spectrum you have the quick hands on preview that masquerades itself as a review. At the other end you have the long term road test, spanning months of usage and truly addressing what the product is like to live with. Balancing needs on both ends of the spectrum is very difficult. Go too far to one side and you end up with nothing more than press release talking points. Go too far to the other and you end up with a review that’s potentially irrelevant by the time it’s published. My goal is to always strike a balance in delivering something deep that’s timely as well. Usually it comes at the expense of sleep, seeing as how there are a finite number of hours in a day.

Our recent review of the new iPad went into great detail on a number of topics – ranging from the display to the SoC, as well as discussing usability. I’ve got another post that I’ll do to talk about some findings on the usability side, but today I want to focus on something I left out of the original review: a comparison to Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 LTE. In the interest of not taking even longer to get the iPad review out, I trimmed the comparison points down to ASUS’ Transformer Prime and Motorola’s Xyboard for battery life and performance. As newer tablets, and with the TF Prime’s position as our favorite Android tablet, the comparison made sense. As many of you pointed out however, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is also offered in an LTE flavor and would have made a great comparison. Before the TF Prime, there was the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and it was our most desired Android tablet for a while.

The Display

The Galaxy Tab 10.1 LTE uses Samsung’s own 1280 x 800 Super PLS display, which a year ago we loved. How does it stack up to the iPad’s Retina Display? In brightness and contrast it’s definitely competitive:

Display Brightness

Display Brightness

Display Contrast

However once you start looking at color quality and gamut, the Galaxy Tab falls in line with the old standard. Samsung delivers similar a similar color gamut percentage to the iPad 2’s display, but the coverage area is different as you can see in the gallery below.

Display Color Gamut (sRGB)

Display Color Gamut (Adobe RGB)

Both are short of the new iPad’s nearly full coverage of the sRGB space.

The delta E values echo what our CIE charts tell us, color and grayscale accuracy is simply better on the new iPad:

Note that ASUS’ TF Prime actually does better in the grayscale dE tests than the iPad. Apple may have raised the bar, but we’re still not anywhere close to perfection here.

Once again we have shots, taken at the same magnification, of the subpixel structure of all of these displays in order of increasing pixel density:

Apple iPad 2, 1024 x 768, 9.7-inches

ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime, 1280 x 800, 10.1-inches

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, 1280 x 800, 10.1-inches

Apple iPad Retina Display (2012), 2048 x 1536, 9.7-inches

Apple iPhone 4S, 960 x 640, 3.5-inches


The Galaxy Tab 10.1 takes us back to a time when NVIDIA’s Tegra 2 was king. It was just a year ago that this was true. OMAP 4 was late, Tegra 3 was an eternity away and no one else had a dual-core Cortex A9 based SoC in shipping products. Unfortunately, by today’s standards, Tegra 2 is pretty slow. Not so much on the CPU side, but on the GPU side. Tegra 2 lacked the extra compute and efficiency improvements needed to really drive a 1280 x 800 display. Couple that with the bloat from Samsung’s TouchWiz update to Honeycomb and you don’t get a very smooth experience on the Galaxy Tab 10.1, especially compared to ASUS’ ICS enabled, Tegra 3 equipped Transformer Prime.

The GPU performance numbers support our subjective findings (more numbers here):

GLBenchmark 2.1 - Egypt - Offscreen 720p

In our iPad review I talked about the gaming experience on Tegra 3 being pretty good using Tegra Zone titles. In fact, if a game is available for both iOS and Tegra Zone, the Tegra version typically looks better thanks to NVIDIA’s investment of additional developer resources for the title. Despite the visual gap, both platforms tend to offer good gaming experiences. The iOS app store is easier to navigate and compatibility with devices is less of a concern there, but developers on both sides of the fence try to deliver a ~30 fps experience regardless of platform. The Tegra 2 experience isn’t bad, but you do have to run games like GTA3 at lower quality settings to get similar frame rates to Tegra 3.

Battery Life

The iPad’s gigantic battery allowed it to last a bit longer on LTE than Motorola’s Xyboard 10.1, but what about compared to the Galaxy Tab 10.1? On LTE the Galaxy Tab 10.1 doesn’t fare as well as the Xyboard:

Web Browsing Battery Life

A few of you asked about video playback battery life of the new iPad. Using our old 720p, no-bframes test I managed 10.02 hours on the new iPad – tangibly less than the iPad 2 but above what Apple claims you should expect from the new tablet. I need to put together a 1080p, high profile video playback test now that more tablets can play higher quality streams. Perhaps I’ll do that in preparation for the TF700 review...

Final Words

Ask and you shall receive (time permitting). For those of you who asked, I hope the data shared here is what you were looking for. I've updated our original iPad review with all of this data as well. In short, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 LTE is a useful but not dramatically different comparison point from the Android camp. In the near term, ASUS' Transformer Pad Infinity is what I'm hoping will be some better competition.

On to the next one…



View All Comments

  • UltraTech79 - Saturday, April 07, 2012 - link

    It's not about you liking it or enjoying it. If that were the case, why are you even here? This is about what is technically the difference. One of superior in several ways, the other has a slightly brighter screen.

    if you're going to sit and argue that you 'enjoy' is so you 'don't understand', then you have failed to see the point of revives like this. Some people still enjoy their gen 1 iPad gen1 Droid tablets, good for them?
  • enealDC - Wednesday, April 04, 2012 - link

    Well I think you are wrong when you say there aren't any decent Android tablets. The Samsung Galaxy 10.1, the Asus Transformer Prime - these are all great examples of tables that are > decent.
    And I think are also wrong on the battery life. The TP has an amazing battery life from my perspective.
    To each his own frankly. I think the new iPAD is an amazing tablet, it's just to restrictive for how I like to play.
  • Belard - Monday, April 02, 2012 - link

    Let's poke a stick into Apple.

    Call the iPad 3, the "iPad 3" rather than 3rd generation. Then again how do we know the difference between the various Samsung and ASUS tablets? Theres two different versions of the transformer Prime.

    Calling the uPad 3 "The new XX" makes no sense? What happens next year?
    Apple releases the "very new iPad" and after that "Latest very new iPad"?

    "I have a unopened box of a new iPad2 selling for the same price as the old used New iPad"?!?!
  • inplainview - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    Not sure what your point is. One thing is quite apparent though, english is not your mother tongue or you are not very smart or you have a hard time trying to get your point across... Reply
  • bigboxes - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    I get it . We all get it. You are an Apple fanboi. You have anything else to add? You want to discuss English with me? Reply
  • SunLord - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    How does that comment make him an apple fanboi? The comment he replied to makes little sense and is more of a rambling rant. I personally don't own a single apple product and never will but the original comment is gibberish.

    There is one version of transformer prime the TF-201 it is available in two colors and multiple storage sizes so any retard can figure out whats what. There is a TF-101 which is the original transformer but it's not a prime notice the helpful model number.

    The GalaxyTAB is a different story given the naming scheme of the upcoming refreshes but for the current 10.1 it's only slightly less clear then the transformer but the only real differences are the modems Wifi, 3g, and LTE and again storage size though Apple has forced it with the 10.1N in Europe with the cool front facing speakers that I wish my tab had.
  • AssBall - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    I didn't understand what the original post was about either. I didn't get ANTI or PRO Apple out of any of it. Not sure what the other guy was dribbling on about. Reply
  • bigboxes - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    See the poster's previous comment. 2+2=4

    Yes, the OP had difficulty in making his point. I felt that the poster attacked his grammar when it was he made little attempt to understand the OP. If he was so smart he could have inferred the OP's sentiments.
  • UltraTech79 - Saturday, April 07, 2012 - link

    Yet that still has nothing to do with him being a fanboi or not.

    Are you retarded?
  • MilwaukeeMike - Tuesday, April 03, 2012 - link

    His point is the naming is pretty dumb. I got it, and he's right. I think you have a hard time understanding, probably because you read 'Let's poke a stick into Apple' and knew you were going to rip on the poster regardless of his opinion. I have the same opinion about Android 4 being called ICS. Why are we keeping track of their cute naming gimmicks when numbers would work fine?

    Thankfully this website avoids calling Apple 'Cupertino' every chance they get like some others out there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now