NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Review: Retaking The Performance Crown
by Ryan Smith on March 22, 2012 9:00 AM ESTBattlefield 3
Its popularity aside, Battlefield 3 may be the most interesting game in our benchmark suite for a single reason: it’s the first AAA DX10+ game. It’s been 5 years since the launch of the first DX10 GPUs, and 3 whole process node shrinks later we’re finally to the point where games are using DX10’s functionality as a baseline rather than an addition. Not surprisingly BF3 is one of the best looking games in our suite, but as with past Battlefield games that beauty comes with a high performance cost
NVIDIA’s cards have always done well at Battlefield 3, which puts the Radeon HD 7900 series in a bad position from the beginning. Short of the GTX 680’s massive lead in the Portal 2 bonus round, this is the single biggest victory for the GTX 680 over the 7970, beating AMD’s best by 28% at 2560, and by continually higher amounts at lower resolutions. Based on our experience with BF3 I’d hesitate to call the 680 fully fluid at 2560 as large firefights can significantly tear into performance relative to Thunder Run, but if it’s not fully fluid then it’s going to be very, very close.
What’s also interesting here is that once again the GTX 680 is doing very well compared to the dual-GPU cards. The GTX 590 and 6990 never pull away from the GTX 680, and at 1920 with FXAA the GTX 680 finally squeaks by and takes the top of the chart. Performance relative to the GTX 580 is also once again good for that matter, with the GTX 680 beating its predecessor by 48% at almost every resolution.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
404 Comments
View All Comments
CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
What you're saying is true for amd cards, and is severe in CF, but true across the board.Lower clocked cpu system, better results from Nvidia.
bozolino - Monday, March 26, 2012 - link
I dont know whats happening. I have a gtx 560 2win and wanted to compare it to the 680 and see if its worth the replace but the charts cant be compared, for example:http://www.anandtech.com/show/5048/evgas-geforce-g...
This review uses an i7 3xxx while the older uses an i7 720, how can the older cpu performs better than the new one?? Something is very odd....
I wish they had used same computer as vga test bench, so we could compare all the results together....
Sharpie - Monday, March 26, 2012 - link
Its about design trade offs, you can increase the memory speed if you have a narrow bus to get the same throughput of something with lower clock speed and a large bus. all depeends on the architectural design so arguing about clock numbers is pointless generally speaking unless you are comparing apples to apples. Comapring an NVidia chip to an ATI chip is apples to oranges. Yes, im an engineer.CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
Oh I get it you're in some pretend world where the card companies are not "fanboy compared" in the article itself.Once the amd card loses, and someone tells the truth about that, it's trolling or fanboy right ?
If an amd fan lies, it's "a good opinion".
If an amd fan liar gets corrected, that's "taking it too far" into "fanboy".
Once aghain, telling the truth on the two competing cards is forbidden only if it's an Nvidia advantage - then WE MUST OMIT the AMD card from the analysis, right ?
I think you might as well NEVER read another article on a card launch at this site, if you intend to stick to your RUDE comment.
CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
Heck you didn't read this article nor many others then that say and prove the exact thing.I'm sure it will never make sense to you.
SlyNine - Friday, April 27, 2012 - link
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's you that doesn't understand the DX API. The CPU's are doing roughly the same thing for both videocards. Cept when it comes to processing the Drivers.CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
The GTX690 currently holds the world record with a 1,900mhz overclock, and is gaining easily 15% with noob out of box overlclocks, and reaching very high memory clocks as well as 1,300+ core, I've seen 1,420 on air, and overclocked models are on their way....So much for that fud about 7970... it's FUD FUD and pure FUD.
blanarahul - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
GTX 690????blanarahul - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
Smart move by NVIDIA. Make a single gpu powerful graphics card to battle the Dual Tahiti monster. Judging by how they are doing the GTX 680 it should have the following specs:-4.72 billion transiostors
2048 CUDA Cores
384-bit memory bus width
3 GB VRAM
600-700 USD
TDP of 225-250W
If the clock speeds high enough, it will be quite a match for the 7990!
The reason i think it will be a single GPU card is because GTX 680=2x GTX 560 Ti.
So it should be GTX 690=2x GTX 580.
CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link
The release date of the 7970 was jan 11th, 2.5 months is opverstating in AMD's favor...Nothing like not knowing what you're talking about huh.
7970's have come down in price a bit, but you still will find them for much more than $569 at an awful lot of USA online places.