Gaming Performance

Gaming performance across the board echoes what we've already seen a lot of - the 3820 shows marginal gains over the 2600K.

Civilization V

Civ V's lateGameView benchmark presents us with two separate scores: average frame rate for the entire test as well as a no-render score that only looks at CPU performance.

Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality

Civilization V - 1680 x 1050 - DX11 High Quality

Crysis: Warhead

Crysis Warhead Assault Benchmark - 1680 x 1050 Mainstream DX10 64-bit

Dawn of War II

Dawn of War II - 1680 x 1050 - Ultra Settings

DiRT 3

We ran two DiRT 3 benchmarks to get an idea for CPU bound and GPU bound performance. First the CPU bound settings:

DiRT 3 - Aspen Benchmark - 1024 x 768 Low Quality

DiRT 3 - Aspen Benchmark - 1920 x 1200 High Quality

Metro 2033

Metro 2033 Frontline Benchmark - 1024 x 768 - DX11 High Quality

Metro 2033 Frontline Benchmark - 1920 x 1200 - DX11 High Quality

Starcraft 2

Starcraft 2

World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

Windows 7 Application Performance Power Consumption
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • murray13 - Saturday, December 31, 2011 - link

    But the rub is, IF your looking at building a system soon, what's the advantage of buying SB over SB-E, other than saving $ on the mb and maybe ram?

    I've spec'd out systems both ways and they're within 10% of each other (when the 3820's out).

    What your saying is that applications won't take advantage of the new hardware even in 3-4 years, they said that 3-4 years ago, too. Today, some are starting to take advantage.

    I'm running a 4 year old Intel system that would probably wax the floor with yours and it IS time for me to upgrade...lol.
  • vol7ron - Sunday, January 1, 2012 - link

    this looks interesting but won't ivy bridge be out around the same time?
  • Denithor - Monday, January 2, 2012 - link

    The one advantage SB-E offers over IB is more RAM. At max IB will offer 4x8GB or 32GB (and expensive, those 8GB sticks aren't cheap) while SB-E with its 8 slots will hold up to 8x8GB or 64GB.
  • soultraveler - Monday, January 2, 2012 - link

    Just wondering if i should just upgrade my 920 cpu and stay on the 1366 platform now seeing as gaming performance hasn't changed much in the past few years. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
  • DarkStryke - Tuesday, January 3, 2012 - link

    Save your money till Ivybridge. SB-E is a waste of money, and a heavily neutered platform chipset currently (x79 was promised with much more then the garbage it ended up being rolled out as).
  • dj christian - Thursday, January 5, 2012 - link

    Why isn't this diss board connected to the forums? I can't keep track off my posts or replies.
  • binqq - Friday, January 6, 2012 - link

    Our Website: ===== www fashion-long-4biz com ====
    Our main product list is as follows:
  • Artifex28 - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    I am a digital composer and hardcore gamer.

    My current E6750 @ 3.2GHz has certainly outlived itself and I am looking to upgrade my setup soon.

    For gaming purposes, I suppose 3820 would be enough. But I am not sure about the digital composing (DAWs, mixing, sample libraries etc). I am aiming for 24-32GB RAM opposed to the 8 GB I got now. Any thoughts if I should wait for Ivy Bridges or not?

    www.soundcloud.com/Artifex28
  • Denithor - Monday, January 9, 2012 - link

    IB probably worth the wait. You will be able to use either 4x8GB (32GB) or 2x8GB + 2x4GB (24GB) with IB. Throw in a nice low power quad and you'll be loving it.

    SBE would save you like $100-150 because you could go with 8x4GB (32GB). Or you could hit 64GB if you really needed that much RAM.
  • Artifex28 - Tuesday, January 10, 2012 - link

    Thanks Denithor.

    One more vote for waiting! :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now