Power Consumption

Since the Dell still uses a traditional CCFL backlight and not an LED backlight, the power consumption falls in line with other traditional 23” displays. At max brightness the Dell consumes 41 watts while at minimum brightness it only consumes 18 watts of power. Heat didn’t seem to be an issue, and while I have no way to measure it, even after sitting here at the display for 2+ hours while I work on this review, neither the screen nor the rear of the panel was very hot to the touch.

Conclusions

Overall the Dell U2311H did a good job as a display, especially when you consider how affordable you can find it available for. The backlight uniformity leaves a bit to be desired, but the dE level was capable of getting to a level that was suitable for print work. The contrast ratio of 1000:1 was very nice compared to other monitors in the same price class as well. While an HDMI input would be nice for those looking to have it serve double duty as a display for gaming or movies, a simple HDMI to DVI adapter will resolve that since it lacks speakers anyway.

We have no problem recommending the Dell U2311H as a step up from the numerous mediocre TN-based LCDs that currently sell for under $200. However, there are other E-IPS LCDs available for under $200, so what you're really paying for here isn't E-IPS but instead it's the other features. What might those be? For one, getting a 23" display with height/swivel/tilt adjustments usually bumps the price up around $50. The other major "extra"? DisplayPort.

Ironically, the royalty-free DisplayPort tends to only show up on more expensive LCDs—a quick search at Newegg for instance shows that the pricing of the U2311H is right in line with other offerings that feature full adjustability and DisplayPort. If you happen to need/want DP support rather than HDMI, it's an important distinction, but you'll pay for the privilege.

Dell U2311H: Brightness, Contrast, and Uniformity
Comments Locked

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • fausto412 - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    i certainly interpreted like it was new tech.

    anyways i want a 25" screen or 24" one to mount on my ergotron monitor arm.
    we need to see more monitor reviews on Anandtech.
  • buhusky - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    agreed, need more monitor reviews.
  • wooties - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    +1
  • Cat - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Please bring back input lag measurement.
  • DaFox - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Agreed. Input lag and pixel response time are the two most important issues to me at this point.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Chris doesn't have a CRT to use as a reference point, so rather than delaying the article we chose to go live without the input lag information.
  • nagi603 - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Does this mean that there won't be an input lag measurement, or that it will be taken later?
  • cheinonen - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    I'm trying to get my hands on a CRT this week and then will try to run those tests as quickly as I can.
  • piroroadkill - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Good. I think input lag measurements are important to a lot of people!
  • semo - Tuesday, September 27, 2011 - link

    Yes. Is it good enough for casual gaming? I'm looking to get a 3 monitor eyefinity setup and wondering if I should have one TN or PVA panel in the middle just for gaming...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now