Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption

Once again I have to state that I'm a big fan of how enterprise-class computers are built, specifically in regards to internal layout. Because these machines are designed to be easily serviced should the need arise, there are really quite a lot of intelligent ideas that go into how they're built that make me wonder why we don't see them more often on the consumer side. Take a look inside the wonderfully small HP Compaq 8200 Elite Ultra-Slim.

Everything is in its right place and extremely easy to service. Due to the smaller form factor, HP opts for mainly notebook parts inside the 8200 outside of the 65-watt processor. There's a substantial heatsink complete with copper heatpipes covering the processor, and a fan from the front channels air straight through it and out of the back of the case, cooling the memory in the process.

When I opened the 8200 the first time I was surprised to see the relatively large empty space in the top left corner; that MXM slot is actually there in case the system is custom ordered with a graphics upgrade, which can be cooled by the second small fan. The catch as noted earlier is that the only graphics upgrade available is an AMD Radeon HD 5450. Given the nature of this desktop, we can't say that upgrade is really worth it.

Considering the low power components of the 8200, it should come as no surprise that the system runs quietly and stays reasonably cool. The CPU temperatures aren't stellar (though they're still better than most notebooks we test), but this is also a very small enclosure, and HP has largely erred on the side of silence rather than performance. Since Sandy Bridge is already a cool-running architecture to begin with, this winds up being the right trade. Air circulation within the chassis also seems to be good enough to keep the 2.5" Western Digital Scorpio Black running cool.

Other than pure size, power consumption winds up being the 8200's trump card. With load power of just 66 watts, it's not hard to see why a business might want to deploy several of these for users who don't need extremely high-powered hardware. Idling at the desktop, it consumes a miserly 20 watts.

Application and Futuremark Performance Conclusion: Day to Day Workhorse
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ro808 - Tuesday, March 29, 2016 - link

    On the comparison of a HP SFF/Ultra Slim Desktop vs an Apple Mac Mini: I use both machines with the following specs:

    - Mac Mini Server 2011, 2.3 GHz i7 with 8 gb and dual WD Black 750 GB hdd's running El Capitan (latest) (bought for 500 euro).
    - HP dc5800, e8400 Core2Duo, 8 gb ram, 250gb Seagate hdd and Radeon HD6450 1 GB Videocard running Win 10 x64 Pro (bought for 25 euro).

    I like both (and the Mac Mini is smaller and of course 'a looker') , but!!!
    Probably due to Windows 10 being considerably lighter on resources compared to the latest editions of OSX the older and by far lesser specced HP feels noticably faster compared to the Mac. The Mac is only used for HT purposes and both hdd's have over 90% free space.
    The HP is used for some serious computing ( Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop, Web development and even 3d Moddeling and CAD) , of course not on a high-end level, but still....
    The hdd of the HP has only 10% free space and.... still it feels more responsive than the Mac does.
    So the HP wins hands down when it comes to value per euro (or USD).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now