Test Setup

Processor Intel Core i5 2500K ES
4 cores, 4 threads, 6MB L3
Motherboards ASUS P8P67
Cooling Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme with one 120MM fan
Power Supply Silverstone 1000W Silver (Power Testing)
OCZ ZX Series 1250w 80 PLUS Gold 
Memory Patriot Viper Extreme DDR3-2000MHz 9-11-9-27 2x4GB - 1.65v
Memory Settings DDR3-1333MHz - 9-9-9-24 1T at 1.65v
Video Cards Sapphire HD 5850 1GB
Video Drivers Catalyst 10.12
Hard Drive Crucial C300
Optical Drive Samsung SH-S223Q
Case Dimastech Bench Table
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit
SATA Testing Crucial C300
USB 2/3 Testing Patriot 64GB SuperSonic USB 3.0

Note - we will be moving to more recent drivers soon.  We still use the 10.12 at the minute to keep parity between motherboard reviews, but this will be updated in the near future.

Comparison to Previous Results:

Where applicable, the results in this review are directly compared to the following chipsets and boards which we have reviewed previously:
 
P67 H67 Z68 A75 A50M
ASRock
P67 Extreme4
ECS
H67H2-M
ASUS
P8Z68-V Pro
ASRock
A75 Extreme6
ASUS
E35M1-I Deluxe
ASUS
P8P67 Pro
Gigabyte
H67MA-UD2H
Gigabyte
Z68X-UD3H-B3
  ECS
HDC-I
Gigabyte
P67A-UD4
ASRock
H67M-GE/HT
    Zotac
FUSION350-A-E
ECS
P67H2-A2
       
ASRock
P67 Extreme6
       
MSI
P67A-GD65
       
ECS
P67H2-A
       
 
Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system as a whole with a wall meter connected to the power supply, while in a dual GPU configuration.  This method allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency.  These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

Power Consumption - Dual GPU

CPU Temperatures

With most users running boards on purely default BIOS settings, we are running at default settings for the CPU temperature tests.  This is, in our outward view, an indication of how well (or how adventurous) the vendor has their BIOS configured on automatic settings.  With a certain number of vendors not making CPU voltage, turbo voltage or LLC options configurable to the end user, which would directly effect power consumption and CPU temperatures at various usage levels, we find the test appropriate for the majority of cases. This does confict somewhat with some vendors' methology of providing a list of 'suggested' settings for reviewers to use.  But unless those settings being implemented automatically for the end user, all these settings do for us it attempt to skew the results, and thus provide an unbalanced 'out of the box' result list to the readers who will rely on those default settings to make a judgement.  

CPU Temperatures

The temperatures which I recorded are higher than motherboards from other manufacturers in a similar price bracket.

Board Features, In The Box and Software System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

52 Comments

View All Comments

  • LoneWolf15 - Friday, September 9, 2011 - link

    I'm not trying to be sarcastic --I'm just wondering why it seems like the P67 chipset is being reviewed (in some cases, even hyped) by tech sites and a lot of users I see in hardware forums now that the Z68 chipset is out.

    For almost every price tier of P67 chipset, I can find a Z68 chipset board within $10-20. The ASUS P8Z68-V is only $15 more than the $150 price of the P8P67 here, and it has more features. There are also lower-priced variants (the V-LX and V-LE) and the higher end V-Pro to round it out.

    I'm just confused as to why the P67 chipset is relevant now that the Z68 chipset is available.
  • faizoff - Friday, September 9, 2011 - link

    I agree with others that reviewing a P67 board at this time is moot. I'd rather read reviews on the Z68 series and see what I'm missing out on. :-)

    But sometimes it's nice to look back on boards and see how they've fared months after release.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now