The AMD 6550D in the A8-3850 is much better than the Intel HD 3000 Graphics in video post processing quality. However, this leads to increased expectations like support for full post processing on Blu-ray videos. Unfortunately, the 6550D has a number of issues which prevent it from fulfilling the requirement.

The Enforce Smooth Video Playback feature needs more work if it is going to get enabled by default. Instead of having pre-defined conditions, it would be beneficial to activate this feature on the fly. Currently, the monitor resolution, input video resolution and bitrate are taken into account while deciding to enable or disable ESVP. This very feature causes botched playback of streams which play properly on the Sandy Bridge systems.

Does the AMD 6550D render a discrete HTPC GPU redundant? With the current state of affairs, we have to say that the market for GPUs such as the GT 430 and the AMD 6570 will remain in place for some time to come.

Features like CrossFire support indicate that AMD seems to have targeted the gamers more than the HTPC enthusiasts with the 6550D. It is also unfortunate that AMD doesn't offer a way to take advantage of a discrete GPU (outside of CF) from a HTPC perspective. SteadyVideo is a nice feature to have, but it comes with its own disadvantages.

There is no QuickSync-like efficient transcoding support in the A8-3850. However, we do not believe it is currently a con for AMD from the perspective of HTPC enthusiasts. QuickSync may become beneficial to HTPC users once open source support materializes or x264 is able to utilize some part of that dedicated silicon encoder, both of which seem unlikely to happen in the near future. [Update: Andrew Van Til has QuickSync support in his DVRMSToolBox utility, but we are looking for more FOSS developers to jump onto the QuickSync bandwagon]

Retaining low end GPU performance for Brazos could have been accepted, but having the same restrictions on the APUs for the mainstream market doesn't pass muster. The 6550D may be a good first step for AMD to counter Intel's GPUs in the HTPC market, but our expectations from the desktop Llano were much higher.

Miscellaneous HTPC Aspects
Comments Locked

104 Comments

View All Comments

  • prdola0 - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    Typical PR stuff. Just as expected. There are cheaper SB-capable boards than that, also with cheaper chipsets.

    But nice try.
  • I hate State - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    Not that I completely disagree with what you said, but why wouldn't you use an H61 board for an HTPC. H61's cost around 70 bucks and you can just tack on a graphics card. Though built in 23.975FPS is nice, I'll be waiting for either Ivy Bridge (if it has the correct playback) or the next generation of Lynx where processing power is up to snuff and hopefully better power draw figures for my next HTPC.
  • Broheim - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    45.99$ for the cheapest H67 on newegg...

    H61 goes down to 31.99$

    where's your god now?
  • MrTeal - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    Got a link to that $31.99 H61 mobo? I can't find it on newegg.
  • Broheim - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
  • blunt14468 - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    OPEN BOX
  • prdola0 - Friday, July 1, 2011 - link

    59$ a brand new one. Still the same point. You?
  • maroon1 - Friday, July 1, 2011 - link

    H61 can found at $60
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    And those are not open box
  • duploxxx - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    just dropped today with more then 50% now aint that funny....
  • Broheim - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    it is still 31.99$ is it not? your move mr. fanboy...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now