Video Encoding Performance

Our DivX test is the same DivX / XMpeg 5.03 test we've run for the past few years now, the 1080p source file is encoded using the unconstrained DivX profile, quality/performance is set balanced at 5 and enhanced multithreading is enabled.

Xmpeg + DivX Encode

Windows Media Encoder 9 - Advanced Profile

Graysky's x264 HD test uses x264 to encode a 4Mbps 720p MPEG-2 source. The focus here is on quality rather than speed, thus the benchmark uses a 2-pass encode and reports the average frame rate in each pass.

x264 HD Benchmark - 1st Pass

x264 HD Benchmark - 2nd Pass

x264 HD 3.03 Benchmark - 1st Pass

x264 HD 3.03 Benchmark - 2nd Pass

 

SYSMark 2007 & Adobe Photoshop Performance 3D Rendering Performance
Comments Locked

78 Comments

View All Comments

  • silverblue - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    I've undervolted my 710. Makes virtually no difference to performance or stability and seemed like a good idea at the time. More people should do it.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    This is ridiculous. BD is one month from launch, and llano has been shiiping for weeks. Yet you guys dont have a single benchmark of either. Or maybe you do and are just too spineless to post them. It is sad that we had better sources of information 10 years ago. Now there is nothing because everyone seems to care too much about NDAs. Who cares about NDAs? If you know someone who has the hardware you should post their review asap, and not worry about NDAs. What good does it do to release a review the same exact day as two dozen other sites? If you want more eggs sometimes you have to sacrifice a few chickens.
  • AssBall - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Who cares about NDAs??? Did you really just ask that?

    How about reviewers that enjoy getting engineering samples, new products to review, and support from the manufacturer's for free? How about any reputable, respectable, reviewer? How about anyone who frowns upon breaking a contract?

    And your chicken analogy is full of fail.
  • heymrdj - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    I asked myself the same thing, did he really just ask that? Someone never took ethics courses, or has any ethics for that matter. Just because you want to drool like a baby over specs is no excuse to ask these reputable authors to break NDA. On the day of release feel more than free to go view any hardware site you wish.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Yeah well you must be a spineless chicken too. There are plenty of ways to get chips. All those engineering samples out there, and no one can get their hands on one? Yeah right. If all NDAs were broken there would be no NDAs. Your brain is full of fail if you cannot understand that. Just a bunch of spineless cowards.
  • Makaveli - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    If its so easy to get one why don't you and post one on your own review site oo wait a min......
  • haplo602 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    are you a total idiot ? it's called competitive advantage. if they would break the NDA, no engineering sample for them for the next round. if everybody breaks the NDA, no launch day reviews. that simple.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Wednesday, May 4, 2011 - link

    The engineering samples would go to different people, but chances are one of them would hook up with someone who has the reputation for having some freakin cojones. Especially if money was involved. There IS money to be made in this way, and its not illegal. Again, it just takes cajones.
  • AssBall - Thursday, May 5, 2011 - link

    You go find a web review site with "cajones" then, since you are so fond of them, and please leave the rest of us in peace while we wait for the non-half-ass Anandtech review after the NDA lifts.
  • Makaveli - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    LMAO when you understand what an NDA is and why you shouldn't break it or alteast turn 18 then come back and post.

    Its obvious Common sense and logic ain't strong in your family.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now