This morning the Samsung Droid Charge arrived on our doorstep, and we've got a few initial impressions and some photos to tide you over until the full review. Last we saw the Droid Charge was at CES, where it was previously named the rather unassuming "Samsung 4G LTE Device."

The Droid Charge is built around a 1 GHz Hummingbird Samsung S5PC110 SoC with a PowerVR SGX540 GPU and 512 MB of RAM just like the original Galaxy S. Cellular connectivity is provided by a Qualcomm MDM9600 for both CDMA2000-1x, EVDO, and LTE. The Charge comes with a preinstalled 32 GB microSD card and 2 GB of internal NAND. The whole thing is topped off with a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED + display, which lacks the pentile subpixel grid and instead implements an RGB stripe. There's a front facing 1.3 MP camera, and rear facing 8 MP camera. Release date isn't quite nailed down for the Charge, but should be later this week. It's also running Android 2.2.1, not 2.3.x Gingerbread.

Physical impressions of the Charge are overall positive. It's nice to have physical android buttons, which are  responsive and clicky if a bit oddly shaped. Likewise I'm actually impressed by how crisp the button clicks for volume and power are. It sounds inane, but this does really make up a significant portion of in-hand feel. The Droid Charge also feels much thinner in the hand than the HTC Thunderbolt we reviewed. 

The back of the Droid Charge is unfortunately the same slippery glossy plastic that adorned a number of Galaxy S models and the Nexus S. In fact, the material appears very similar to the Nexus S. There's a lip at the bottom as well which definitely seems familiar. The slippery back material is gone in Samsung Galaxy S 2, which makes its continued presence here puzzling to me. There's a microUSB port on the left, microHDMI on the right. 

I'm going to have to take another trip up to Phoenix, AZ to test LTE, so I don't have any impressions about connectivity outside EVDO. The Charge unsurprisingly does not support simultaneous 1x voice and EVDO data (SVDO), but should support 1x voice and 4G LTE data (SVLTE). This is all built around the same MDM9600 we've talked about extensively in both LTE pieces. 

Probably the most notable new thing is the SAMOLED+ display, which again lacks a Pentile subpixel layout and instead implements an RGB stripe. Whites are still not entirely perfect at lower brightness settings, where they look somewhat yellow. At higher brightnesses, SAMOLED+ really shines.

 

 
Left: Samsung Galaxy S AMOLED display with Pentile, Right: SAMOLED+ with RGB stripe (photo taken at approximately the same magnification, color stripe is due to aliasing)

We've switched to using an XRite i1Pro spectroradiometer on loan from NEC for measuring any AMOLED device, and by the numbers the SAMOLED+ display on the Droid Charge is a little less radiant (258 nits vs 293 nits) than the AMOLED panel in the Galaxy S, but the white point is also better (8720K vs 9920K). 

We'll have a full review up in the coming days (as soon as I can head to Phoenix and back for LTE testing), but until then we've put together a gallery with some photos of the Charge from all angles. 

POST A COMMENT

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • calyth - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    That's a welcomed addition. I bloody hated those touch sensitive buttons that didn't respond, nor have any feedback when pressed. Reply
  • eddman - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    You said HTC Thunderbolt was the first Verizon LTE smartphone. Now you say Samsung Charge is the first. Am I missing something here? Reply
  • cjl - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    The Charge is the first LTE Droid. The Thunderbolt wasn't branded as a Droid. Reply
  • eddman - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    OK, but what's the significance of the droid brand anyway? Aren't all android phones referred to as droids? Reply
  • Stuka87 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    No, Droid is a trademarked name that Motorola uses for their phones. They actually licensed it from Lucas Films, who owns the trademark on "Droid".

    So while some people may say all android phones are Droids in passing, from an actual naming scheme, only the Motorola's are Droids.
    Reply
  • dagamer34 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Motorola didn't pay LucasFilms for the trademark, Verizon did. That's why there are HTC Droid phones like the Droid Eris and Droid Incredible. Reply
  • evan919 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Droid is a brand licensed by Verizon, not Motorola. There was a none Motorola Droid device last year, the HTC Droid Incredible. The Droid Charge is the second non-Motorola Droid device. Reply
  • eddman - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    Still, it's not a significant branding at all and IMO does not deserve a special title like that, because it's misleading and might result in people thinking that it's verizon's first android LTE phone. Reply
  • RNC91325 - Tuesday, May 3, 2011 - link

    The Droid branding is supposed to be for their top end Android phones. Reply
  • synaesthetic - Sunday, May 8, 2011 - link

    Well I guess it makes sense if the Charge is faster than the Thunderbolt.

    Since the Thunderbolt is already slower than my MT4G for whatever reason, despite using the exact same CPU...
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now