Round 4 - Cameras

The Nook doesn’t have a camera, so Samsung wins by default. With that said, I never missed having cameras on the Nook while I had it. I understand the allure of having a front facing camera from the videoconferencing point of things, but I never figured out why I would need a rear facing camera on a tablet. I’m not going to complain that they have them, but just given the usage model of tablets, I’m not sure how often most people use the rear facing cameras. Usually with tablets, you’re just sitting somewhere, either at home or somewhere like a Starbucks or a library, and generally you don’t need to take pictures of stuff there. It’s like putting an outward facing webcam on a notebook - sure, I’m sure someone somewhere would find a use for it, but for a vast majority of users, what’s the point? It’s why the rotating webcams on laptops died out long ago; it was a part that had little to no usage model. 

Maybe I’m weird, but I’m legitimately curious for those people that have iPad 2s or any of the other tablets. How often have you guys ended up using the rear facing cameras?
 
 
Anyways, back to the Samsung’s cameras, our findings remain pretty similar to before. Passable still quality; with enough natural light, you will get solid Facebook quality pictures. With less light, you’re going to regret even trying to take a picture. Video turns out okay, but there’s no HD recording like there is on the Galaxy S devices. I kind of wish Samsung had used the same camera module as the handsets, but on a lower-end device this, I can understand why they didn’t. 

AnandTech - Samsung Galaxy Tab Video Sample

Round 3 - Display Round 5 - Battery Life
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • MossySF - Monday, May 30, 2011 - link

    The specs for Archos 70 say:

    • High resolution screen, WVGA 800 x 480 pixels, 7'' TFT LCD, 16 million colors
    • Capacitive multitouch screen

    Yes on the resolution. No on resistive.
  • medi01 - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    " Overclocked kernels, custom skins and launchers, updating the ROM to the latest nightly build, anything you could possibly dream of. That's something you just won't get with the Samsung..."

    Samsung Galaxy Tab was rootable even back in 2010.
  • ironmb - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    I will never understand this new fad of tablets.. to each is own i guess.
  • mi1stormilst - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Bought one for my wife, rooted in about 15 minutes she uses it for reading and gaming and surfing. Not everything works perfectly, but the battery life is more than decent and it is very much a usable product. We read from both the Kindle App and the B&N App with no trouble. I got it during the Ebay B&N sale for $199 enough said :-)
  • IdBuRnS - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    My wife uses my rooted CN all the time for playing Angry Birds. lol
  • dukepeter - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    It seems like the WiFi-only Galaxy Tab packs OMAP3* as well, not Hummingbird.
    this was reported here: http://www.thegalaxytabforum.com/index.php?/topic/...

    can anybody confirm?
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Did you read the article before posting this? It does so.
  • Stanil - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    In the original it said Hummingburd and PowerVR 540, they changed it post factum :) Thx for the specs, I wasn't sure if the castrated version was only for Europe.
  • dukepeter - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    yes, i read the article, and i remember clearly it said Hummingbird and PowerVR SGX540.
    But yes, they have changed it now. i wish i had been wrong =|
  • VivekGowri - Wednesday, May 25, 2011 - link

    Yeah sorry, I had changed it on my document file but apparently not the actual article engine before posting - sorry guys, that was a big time proof-reading error by me.

    It felt very bait-and-switch to me, I never noticed it was SGX 530/OMAP3 until I ran the gaming tests and went o_O. I don't mind too much about downgrading the Bluetooth, but the SoC downgrade is pretty terrible.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now