The slate computing market is about to explode, with a literal flood of new tablets releasing over the coming months. Many of them will be Android based, running Nvidia’s Tegra 2 SoC. Nvidia made a big deal about Tegra 2 back at CES 2010, but for some reason, it’s taken quite a bit of time for anything running the platform to hit the market. Finally, we have one - the Viewsonic G Tablet.

The Tegra 2-based Viewsonic G Tablet showing the Tap UI homescreen

The specs are pretty straightforward; we’ve got a 10” WSVGA display with LED backlighting, Android 2.2 with a specialized UI skin on top, a 16GB microSD card, 2.4GHz 802.11n, Bluetooth 2.1, a 27 Whr lithium ion battery, and the Tegra 2 SoC. The dual-core Cortex A9 is clocked at a nice, round 1 GHz, and there’s 512MB of LPDDR RAM on board. The GPU is Nvidia’s Ultra-Low Power GeForce GPU and there are separate HD video encode and decode blocks also onboard. But the big deal with Tegra 2, as Anand went over in his first look at the SoC, is Cortex A9. The A9 is an out of order architecture with a relatively short pipeline, so it should be significantly faster than the in-order A8 on a per-clock basis.

But before we get to the performance aspect, let’s give the tablet a once over. The Viewsonic is not the most interesting physical specimen, just a screen with a thin bezel around it. From the front, it looks nearly identical to the Galaxy Tab and any number of other tablets on the market. The sides are pretty plain, with volume buttons at the top and a dock connector and mic at the bottom. The left side has a mini USB port, a headphone jack, and a power jack, while there are speakers on either side. The back is filled with logos - Viewsonic, the gTablet logo, the American distributor’s logo, barcode, FCC ID, etc - but otherwise pretty plain. Build quality is actually pretty decent and the tablet has a pretty weighty feel in hand. There’s no flex anywhere, and while the casing doesn’t feel particularly high quality, it’s not low quality by any means. There are some touches in the industrial design that make it seem a bit cheap. The capacitive touch buttons are off-center and easy to press inadvertently, and the physical buttons are placed pretty haphazardly. One thing that really threw me off is the volume rocker, which is switched from the logical layout (volume up is the lower button, volume down is the upper button).

The Viewsonic (left) next to the Samsung Galaxy Tab, both on maximum brightness, to illustrate the viewing angles of both tablets

But for $399 for a Tegra 2 tablet, minor quibbles about build quality and industrial design are about what one should expect. I also expected a not-so-great screen, but not like this. I know that not everyone can splurge like Apple did and go for an IPS screen, but when you look at the TN panels in these and other tablets, it really does make sense. The problem isn’t contrast ratio, the 432:1 figure is actually pretty good for a netbook screen and much better than most small notebooks. It doesn't match the iPad's amazing 934:1 contrast ratio, but still, contrast is not the problem. Unfortunately, the max brightness is not that high at 186nits, which only exacerbates the terrible viewing angles. Something I’ve realized in using tablets - the viewing angles matter a whole lot more than they do in laptops. As is typical with widescreen displays, the horizontal viewing angle is decent, but the vertical viewing angle is pretty bad - anything more than 30 degrees off center and the screen completely washes out. If I try to lay it flat on my desk and use it like my iPad or the Galaxy Tab, it’s basically impossible to see anything on the screen. For a device with a usage model so heavily dependant on good off-center viewing angles, speccing a screen with poor viewing angles was a pretty big oversight.

Viewsonic's Tap UI landscape split keyboard in the revised browser interface

Viewsonic loaded their own Tap UI onto the G Tablet. It’s a decent looking UI, but it’s aggravatingly slow and makes most of the navigation through the OS pretty painful. As with most tablets, there’s no Market preinstalled on the G Tablet (Samsung is the exception here, since they have managed to work around the Android Market restrictions). However, the XDA developers forum is your friend - there’s a simple workaround to get Market and other Google applications enabled, and it’s also possible to disable the UI skin. We’ll go over the software package and hacking aspects of the G Tablet in the full review; for now just know that the preloaded UI is pretty terrible, you'll want to disable it as soon as possible.

The G Tablet (center) next to the Galaxy Tab (left) and T-Mobile G2 (right)

Our first impressions of the G Tablet, beyond the woeful viewing angles and the unfortunate UI skin, is actually that of a fairly usable budget tablet. The user experience is actually pretty decent once you get out of the main UI and into an app or a browser window, and the split keyboard in landscape mode is much better than expected. The tablet has a nice, weighty feel in hand, but if you're using it in landscape mode, it might feel a little heavy for one-handed operation. The touchscreen is responsive enough, though it doesn't feel quite as sensitive as the Galaxy Tab or the iPad. That could just be because of the overall sluggishness of the UI, but we'll see about that after I load the stock Android UI onto the G Tablet. We'll see, but at first brush it looks like the main problems with the Viewsonic are the screen and the UI. We'll have a full review later on with more complete impressions and battery life numbers, but for now, we'll leave you with a preview of Tegra 2 performance.

Viewsonic G Tablet - Tegra 2 Performance
POST A COMMENT

78 Comments

View All Comments

  • VivekGowri - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    The stock Android 2.2 browser? Reply
  • IntelUser2000 - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    "44 Whr lithium ion battery"

    I think you got this wrong. The best way to calculate WHr is by looking at the battery directly. From other sites I hear its 3.65AHr with 7.4V, which equals 27WHr.
    Reply
  • VivekGowri - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    Yeah.....I really don't know how that happened. My bad, fixed. Reply
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    I've had one for a couple of weeks and agree with Vivek's assessment. Unfortunately there's nothing you can do about the screen, though some folks swear turning it upside down gives better viewing angles.

    If you are comfortable flashing ROMs, there are a couple of really good ones on XDADevelopers that change everything back to the stock Android 2.2 interface. You can also add the full Market, Flash, etc. Once Viewsonic releases the source, I expect even better ROMs.
    Reply
  • VivekGowri - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    Yeah, based on our latest sources, the next generation tablets are going to reach my door on a tidal wave. Reply
  • Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    $400 is not a budget tablet. It is a disgrace. These guys are going for margins higher than Apple. Reply
  • vol7ron - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    Maybe you touched on this, but where is the iPad figures?

    I know you're using the iPhone 4 for it's new hardware, which is good, but let's compare apples to apples. You can't touch on the better quality screen and not show the performance numbers of the tablet devices. Phones are vastly smaller than tablets, thus there should be less work on the GPU and less dependency on RAM, which could impact the performance. Keep that figure in there, but also show the iPad.

    Also, IMO the only two tests that really mean anything is the JavaScript, which the A9 seems to excel at and the MFLOPs, which the A9 doesn't even top the list. Perhaps the Lincraft is one of the tests that don't take advantage of CPUs capable of handling multiple threads? If that's the case, it's understandable, but otherwise we this thing should be getting more MFLOPs.

    I'm looking forward to the battery life figures.
    Reply
  • sirsoffrito - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    "let's compare apples to apples."

    Oh...

    I get it.

    You made a funny.
    Reply
  • metafor - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    I'm surprised Tegra 2 did as well as it did in Linpack at all, what with the lack of an FPU and all. Reply
  • michael2k - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - link

    The iPhone's resolution is 960x640, and it has an 800MHz A4 and 512MB of RAM, so it isn't actually all that far off from an iPad in the first place, other than screen size, brightness, and battery, none of which were tested here. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now