Power Consumption

With no quad-core 32nm desktop parts on the market today, Sandy Bridge only needs to beat Lynnfield to be more power efficient - which it does very well:

Idle power remains unchanged, but load power is much lower at the same clock and even within the same price target.

Windows 7 Gaming Performance Final Words
POST A COMMENT

200 Comments

View All Comments

  • starx5 - Tuesday, September 7, 2010 - link

    And why didn't you ran 2560x1600(or higher resolution like eyefinity) benchmark either?

    Is this because sandybrige is not that good?
    Reply
  • wut - Friday, September 10, 2010 - link

    So you're expecting eyeinfinity out of a single integrated graphics connection out the back of a motherboard?

    Are you okay?
    Reply
  • gundersausage - Tuesday, October 26, 2010 - link

    i7-950 vs i7-2500K... So which will be faster and a better gaming chip? anyone? Reply
  • WillyMcNilly - Thursday, October 28, 2010 - link

    Fantastic preview! I am definetly getting sandy bridge now. Apparently the Gigabyte P67-UD7 will have a geforce n200 chipset and support full 16X/16X sli AND crossfire! It will make a significant upgrade from my Phenom 2 and I cannot see myself waiting for bulldozer which has apparently been delayed (gee what a surprise!) until Q4 2011. Reply
  • Chrisch - Wednesday, November 24, 2010 - link

    which sample did you use for your tests?

    QDF Q12W = GT1 (850-1100MHz)
    QDF Q12X = GT2 (850-1100MHz)
    Reply
  • techeadtrevor - Thursday, December 30, 2010 - link

    Hey guys, checkout this review of the i7-2600k... I think its bogus...tell me what you think of it on here.
    ( http://en.inpai.com.cn/doc/enshowcont.asp?id=7944 )
    Reply
  • psiboy - Sunday, January 2, 2011 - link

    Catalyst 8.12... WTF! 2 year old drivers? How much did intel bribe you to use drivers that old for their competition? That is a really bad path to guy down... Tom's did weird stuff like that a while back and lost readers because of it.... You just lost my respect Anand.... Reply
  • kmidm - Thursday, January 6, 2011 - link

    I don't think an entire product line of CPU's with on-board graphics is anything really to get excited about, especially for us geeks. I guess I'm just old-school. The Sandy Bridge ,like Clarksdale, has similar benefits from a single-chip chipset which is very appealing from a throughput and control standpoint. Reply
  • katleo123 - Tuesday, February 1, 2011 - link

    Take nother look at Sandy bridge
    visit http://www.techreign.com/2010/12/intels-sandy-brid...
    Reply
  • hapeid - Friday, March 10, 2017 - link

    Wow Intel owns when it came to converting video, beating out much faster dedicated solutions, which was strange but still awesome.

    I don't know how AMD's going to fare but i hope their new architecture will at least compete with these CPU's, because for a few years now AMD has been at least a generation worth of speed behind Intel.

    Also Intel's IGP's are finally gaining some ground in the games department.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now