Intel X25-V in RAID-0: Faster than X25-M G2 for $250?
by Anand Lal Shimpi on March 29, 2010 8:59 PM ESTSequential Read/Write Speed
Using the 6-22-2008 build of Iometer I ran a 3 minute long 2MB sequential test over the entire span of the drive. The results reported are in average MB/s over the entire test length:
This starts out very interesting. Each SATA port on our X58 board is bound by a 3Gbps transfer limit, but run two in parallel and you can go much higher. Our pair of X25-Vs are actually faster than Crucial's RealSSD C300 on a 6Gbps controller! That's absolutely nuts.
Sequential write speed also shows a near doubling of performance, unfortunately that only brings us up to ~84MB/s. It's not bad for most users but if you do a lot of heavy downloading or file copying, you'll still be behind an Indilinx, Crucial or SandForce drive.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
87 Comments
View All Comments
galvelan - Friday, April 2, 2010 - link
Looks forward to the info Annihilus.GullLars - Saturday, April 3, 2010 - link
Damn, that's a lot of RE:'sAnyways, i thought i'd post it here so everyone could see:
The numbers he's refering to shows 16KB stripe as superior performance-wise.
Here's the PCmark vantage HDD scores of 3 x25-V's in RAID-0 by stripe size:
16KB: 74 164
32KB: 70 364
64KB: 63 710
128KB: 55 045
For those wondering, 16KB shows 540MB/s read and 131MB/s write in CrystalDiskMark 3.0 while 128KB shows 520MB/s read and 131MB/s write (1000MB lenght, 5 runs)
Also, here are the AS SSD total scores by stripe size for 3 x25-V's in RAID-0:
16KB: 809
32KB: 797
64KB: 795
128KB: 774
By doing PCmark vantage points multiplied by 2/3, i guess Anand used a 128KB stripe.
If he'd used a 16KB stripe, the numbers would likely be around 48-49 000
This is supported by benchmarking done by the user Anvil, who got 47 980 points in the Vantage HDD test with 2 x25-V's in RAID-0 off ICH10R with a 16KB stripe size. (IRST 9.6 driver, writeback cache disabled).
galvelan - Friday, April 2, 2010 - link
Excellent info GullLars... Think others are just thinking that 128k is best for all SSD's.. But they obviously are not all the same.. Thanx alot!!mschira - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
Hi I like to get two 160 25-M for RAID. Linux software RAID to be precise.Can I use TRIM then?
best
M.
yacoub - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
"earlier this month Intel launched its first value SSD: the X25-V."Last month.
The drive was definitely available in early February. Maybe you started writing this article in February? :)
buzznut - Thursday, April 1, 2010 - link
bought mine in January.Lithium - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
Great test Mr. Anand.
Few weeks ago I purchased two Kingston 40GB drives to do just that, RAID-0.
Can you please explain which program you use for Secure Erase and in which enviroment, from DOS or Windows.
Next, when you create smaller 60GB partition, from DOS or from Win7 setup. Should I use quick format from Win7 setup...
All the best
Thanks
7Enigma - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
Hi Anand,It it really as simple as copying a large file(s) to the free space of these SSD's in RAID to bring performance back to similar to a secure erase?
If so why doesn't Intel or some other 3rd party release a small program that simply uses My Computers' free space measurement, copy a file of the same size to the SSD and then delete it? Seems like it could be done very easily.
Thanks for the mini-review....makes me want to get another 80gig G2 to RAID with my current one!
mervincm - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
I think this app does exactly that. You can even pick if it writes )'s or 1'smervincm - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link
Freespacecleaner AS-Clean