We will finish up our P55 previews this weekend (or later) with a couple of new boards from ASUS and Biostar. In the meantime, I just wanted to comment on the Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2. I have over a dozen P55 boards in the labs with several more arriving shortly. Already, two motherboards have risen to the top in regards to overclocking performance and a couple of boards have really impressed me with their balance of great performance and excellent feature sets.

That said, this particular board has been the most fun so far in testing. However, I will confess that I am partial to solid performing, budget priced, uATX form factor boards so my comments on these products tend to have some rah-rah in them if they perform well. Speaking of performance, I cannot comment on the numbers due to the NDA. Even though we have half a dozen retail purchased processors, memory kits, coolers, and this motherboard, Intel is sticking to their guns about violating the NDA release on i5/P55.

So that leaves me with providing vague comments like the board having a very good performance to price ratio. Maybe something along the lines of "I just cannot believe it does not cost more" is appropriate considering the feature set and performance compared to a few other boards.

This does not mean the board is going to hit 272 Bclks or provide class leading performance. It just means that spending less than $105 for this board and pairing it up with a Core i5-750 is going to lead to some fun times for the P55 budget seekers, HTPC groupies, or the SFF gaming crowd. We have word from ASRock and Foxconn that they will be providing $100 uATX P55 boards but we have not seen the feature sets yet.

Let's take a quick look at the GA-P55M-UD2. I forgot to mention, you can purchase this board now (as we did) from Provantage for less than $105. Update - The board is sold out again but should be in back in stock shortly, probably at less than $100.



Considering the limited board space, Gigabyte did a very good job fitting all of the peripherals onto this board. About the only negatives we can think of is the continued inclusion of the floppy drive port and the lack of passive cooling for the MOSFET area. The board only sports two fan headers so that might also be a problem for users with two or more 3-pin case fans. The board does support CrossFireX operation although we highly recommend against this setup as the second PCIe x16 slot is actually an x4 electrical slot running off the P55 chipset. The board contains Gigabyte's UltraDurable 3 technology that features their 2oz. copper based PCB, solid capacitors, low RDS(on) MOSFETs, and ferrite core chokes.



Gigabyte utilizes a solid six-phase PWM setup on this board.  The CPU area is open for the most part and will accommodate larger coolers like the Thermalright MUX 120. Large push/pull coolers like the Vigor Monsoon III LT will block the first DIMM slot. If you plan on running this board with Bclk rates above 170 or so, we suggest additional airflow across the MOSFETs to ensure 24/7 stability when overclocking.



The IDE port, 24-pin ATX power connector, and the four DIMM slots are located in the lower right hand corner of the board. This board supports dual channel memory configurations and 16GB of DDR3 memory when using 4GB DIMMS. Installing the memory with a video card inserted in the first slot is difficult but not impossible.



There are five (blue) SATA 3Gb/s ports provided by the P55 chipset that support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10. The sixth port available on the P55 (under the blue heatsink) is utilized on the I/O panel for eSATA. Gigabyte includes the JMicron JMB363 3Gb/s SATA chip that drives the two white SATA ports and provides IDE support. The front panel header, two USB headers, and the IEEE 1394a header are located at the edge of the board.



Gigabyte includes two PCIe x16 slots (x16 operation for the first slot, x4 operation for the second slot) and two PCI slots. The first PCI slot will be unavailable when utilizing a dual slot video card.



Last but not least is the I/O panel. We have ten USB 2.0 ports (total of fourteen on the board), combination PS/2 port, single eSATA port, IEEE 1394a port offered by the TI TSB43AB23 chipset, Gigabit Ethernet LAN port via the Realtek RTL8111D chipset, optical out/coaxial out S/PDIF ports, and the audio panel that provides 8-channel audio output via the Realtek ALC 888B HD audio codec.



BIOS Information

Apparently this preview did not have enough substance in it according to a few reader comments. I totally agree. However, I will state this one more time, we are bound by an NDA and cannot provide that substance for another week or so. That said, we can now show the general layout of the BIOS, thus providing a little more substance than we had yesterday. I will leave it at that for now.



System Status Summary Screen - Those numbers are interesting for a $100 motherboard. The only question is if they are simulated or real.


Same Advanced Frequency options as the more expensive Gigabyte P55 motherboards.






More than enough memory options for most of us...


All the voltages you will need to hit 4.3GHz on air and it takes about five seconds to do it.
Comments Locked

76 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mugur - Saturday, August 29, 2009 - link

    Since I own 2 uAX Antec cubes (with 2 Gigabyte boards :-) ) I'm very interested. This or the AM3 equivalent will stay in the cubes (although a low W 2.5 Ghz Phenom II X4 sounds nice).
  • Mugur - Saturday, August 29, 2009 - link

    Sorry for the above typos... Where are the times when you actually stayed on a desk with a real keyboard?

    Just wanted to add that many times, for me anyway, presenting a motherboard is more interesting than showing 10 pages of benchmarks at 2% diference. Features, BIOS settings, layout, heat, stability are far more important than squeezing another 10 Mhz Bclk.
  • TA152H - Friday, August 28, 2009 - link

    Why don't you spend some time doing some real reviews on real i7 motherboards, instead of these worthless pictorials on a brain-damaged version that's not even out yet.

    The P55 motherboard articles might actually be interesting once you can get processors and show benchmark results.

    I feeling like I'm in a Twilight Zone Episode where everyone's excited about nothing, and making a big deal.

    Are you guys that desperate for hits that you keep shamelessly showing P55 pictures without any real meat to them?

    I think just about everyone would prefer to see a real article on a x58 motherboard, with real benchmarks. Of even a P45. Or maybe do some real work and get a VIA processor and motherboard, and review it.

    I know it's easier to just take pictures of a brain-damaged platform, for brain-damaged people, but have a little pride.
  • PassingBy - Monday, August 31, 2009 - link

    1156 isn't a 'brain damaged platform for brain damaged people'. It will perform rather well as a desktop platform. A typical desktop user doesn't need tri-channel DDR3 or more than 16 PCIe lanes. What they do need is cheaper motherboards. This blog/article presents a motherboard from a big name like Gigabyte that was/will be available for around $100.
  • PassingBy - Monday, August 31, 2009 - link

    I should have said. "a typical desktop user doesn't need more than 16 PCIe lanes for graphics".
  • wicko - Sunday, August 30, 2009 - link

    Shit! You're right! It's brain-damaged! You better run off and let Intel know, because I don't think they are aware of this issue! I feel that they could really use your expertise and experience. Why waste your time telling us these things and spending 100 hours writing articles on mainframe history, when you could be MAKING A DIFFERENCE!?!?!?
  • jasonbird - Friday, December 25, 2009 - link

    http://www.socheapwholesale.com">http://www.socheapwholesale.com
    http://www.1stjerseys.com">http://www.1stjerseys.com
    http://www.socheapwholesale.com/NFL-Jerseys.html">http://www.socheapwholesale.com/NFL-Jerseys.html
    http://www.1stjerseys.com/NHL-Jerseys.html">http://www.1stjerseys.com/NHL-Jerseys.html
  • TA152H - Sunday, August 30, 2009 - link

    They're aware of it. They do it all the time with Celerons and such, or Pentiums now. It's just not as much.

    It's for marketing. They cut off some of the cache, or slow down the FSB, etc... for little technical reason, but mainly for marketing reasons.

    It's fine, but when sites just keep harping on it, with pictures of motherboards, it's bizarre beyond belief. Why not spend the effort writing articles on VIA chips, which people are interested in. Instead, they write articles on motherboard pictorials. It's absurd.

    They get hits, but they lose their reputation in doing it.
  • PopcornMachine - Saturday, August 29, 2009 - link

    Why don't you NOT read something that YOU are not interested in.

    Amazing amount of brain damage involved there.
  • TA152H - Saturday, August 29, 2009 - link

    Because I keep hoping, against all odds, they actually put some real information in the articles. Then I read the useless trash, and it's nothing but irritating.

    This is fluff. And honestly, if you like it, you're an idiot. Luckily for you, you're not alone in the world.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now