It has been a very busy winter and spring, with new camera models from just about every serious DSLR vendor and every wannabe vendor in the photo universe. One of the very nice things about reviewing camera equipment is you eventually get to try them all out, and in the process you sometimes end up finding a winner or two.

This time around there was a really unexpected surprise. Sometimes one camera or another stands out, or one lens strikes us a particularly great solution. This time one DSLR blew the socks off everything else in the DSLR universe.

A little drum roll please as our prejudices get aired with more truth than we normally care to share! The Olympus E3 is a truly remarkable camera and one that completely surprised us at AT. We were fully prepared to hate another iteration of the 4/3 sensor, but the E3 was far better than we had any right to expect. We did not see how Olympus could solve the terrible viewfinder problem or the archaic 3-point AF, but they solved them both in spades. It is true that Oly had to go to 110% magnification to get a great viewfinder, and they went to an 11-point double cross-sensor AF (that’s 44 discrete AF points for those that are counting), but they did it and the E3 is a simply terrific camera. 

Because the Olympus E3 is so good we read the Camera-of-the-Year issue of Popular Photography and decided it was probably typical Canikon bias that PopPhoto named the D300 “Camera of the Year” when the E3 was clearly the deserving recipient. Or it was an honor that was bought like automobile “Car of the Year” awards.

That conclusion was so certain that it took quite a few months for us to actually pay serious attention to the D300. Eventually that D300/D3 bi-umvirate could no longer be ignored. It is not without egg on our face that we report that we were absolutely blown away by the D300.

We tested it with the 18-200 AF-S (Silent Wave Motor) VR (Vibration Reduction – Nikon’s Optical Image Stabilization) lens and we finally understood why Nikon fans have waited in queues for this lens and this camera. Frankly the 18-200mm isn’t the best Nikon lens – far from it – but the combination of that incredible range in a single compact lens with Optical image Stabilization is incredible.  The D300 is the first DSLR we have tested that almost forces you to take better pictures, and the 18-200 VR lens on the D300 is a combo that almost will never miss a photo opportunity.

The D300 also features a completely reworked grip – one that leaves the battery in the camera like the Pentax K20D/K10D grip. The new MB-D10 is also fairly compact, unlike the Sony A700 grip, and incredibly lightweight for a Nikon grip with just one added EN-EL3e battery. The MB-D10 boosts the already remarkable 6 frames per second of the D300 body to 8 frames per second with the grip.  This compares to no speed boost at all with the Olympus or Sony or Pentax grips on their prosumer models.

We’ve always liked the high-end Nikon menus and the flash system that makes Canon flash look like a work in progress, but the lack-luster D60 had soured us toward Nikon this year. The D60 is much wanting compared to the Canon XSi which runs circles around Nikon’s entry model. In fairness the XSi costs a good deal more than a D60, but even the XTi which sells for the same or less than the D60 is superior.

However, moving to the top the D300 similarly makes the 40D look like a feeble effort at competition. We wondered what Nikon might do with their sensor supplier – Sony – now a competitor - and the answer is that Nikon does absolutely everything better with the same base sensor.

It still bugs me to mount Nikon lenses. It’s certainly familiar and a non-issue for the many Nikon shooters, but for others Nikon turns the opposite direction of every other camera maker. Nikon’s tiny and archaic looking lens mount also appears almost laughable today, thought the retained compatibility is certainly a partial raison d’être. In comparison the Canon, Olympus and even Sigma all-electronic mounts look like engineering masterpieces that are all grown up. But one run with a swift and silky smooth Silent Wave Motor lens makes you forget how goofy the lens mount looks. The motor lenses are fast, smooth, and superb in quality – and that’s what we are all looking for.

The front and rear dials also make sense – like those on the Pentax K20 – without requiring thumb gymnastics to do something useful as we often feel on the 40D. You will also find a real HDMI connector behind one of the side seals. It can even take a normal HDMI connector instead of the “mini” HDMI needed by the Sony A700 – the only other competitor to feature HD output to you HD TV or computer screen. 

We also have to wonder why the idea of a dedicated LCD cover and protector is such a mystery to Canon and some others? Nikon seems to have figured it out, and they supply LCD covers on many of their cameras – even the mid-entry D80.

The Nikon screen is truly hi-res at 920,000 dots in the 3” LCD – the same as the Sony A700. The Canon 40D and XSi by comparison only have 230,000 pixels in their low-res 3” screens. If you think the LCD is only about size you should compare the D300 and 40D side by side. The difference in image clarity is very easy to see.

There is also that new 51-point autofocus module shared with the full-frame D3 and the best, brightest, cleanest viewfinder since Nikon starting making DSLR cameras. The 51-points work very well and they are gorgeous for those who value bragging rights – which is certainly none of our readers. However, the 51-points are a bit slower than the older 11, but even here Nikon allows the user to select a super fast 11 point AF instead where speed is the main concern as in sports shooting.

Nikon is justly famous for their in-camera image-processing. With the same CCD sensor in past cameras they routinely outperformed the sensor manufacturer’s cameras using the same sensor. In the D300/D3 Nikon has performed major upgrades to the EXSPEED chp and the associated processing support electronics. This includes selectable 12 and 14-bit processing, significantly larger and enhanced scene recognition, and upgrades to AF, buffering, write speed and metering. 

Every top “prosumer” or Pro camera these days seems to pay attention to the limited contrast that is the Achilles heel of digital images, and Nikon calls their version Active D-Lighting.  What is welcomed here is the very wide range of adjustments with ADR, as this feature is called in the menus, and the fact that it works exceptionally well. 

The new CMOS sensor, manufactured by Sony, appears to have a wider dynamic range to start with than competing cameras. Add an effective and tweakable ADR and dynamic range of the D300 is stand-out. With a CMOS sensor there was also an opportunity for Nikon to lower power requirements and greatly extend battery life. We haven’t measured the difference, but the new battery just seems a little like the Energizer bunny – it just keeps on working. It is a good thing the battery is long-lasting because the D300 is a camera you want to use, refining and tweaking your camera settings, as much as possible

In fact the image control capabilities of the D300 are so tweakable that the manual is 421 pages, which certainly makes it the War and Peace of camera manuals. The extensive controls are not wasted efforts, however, because unlike some competing models the D300 tweaks work, and they allow any photographer to set up their preferences for shooting and image capture the way THEY want.

Handling and the multitude of tweaks aside, the end result – the reason for being – is the image. Here, Nikon makes us all believers. Un-tweaked, Un-manipulated, un-Photoshopped, un-RAW-processed images are gorgeous on the D300. They are so good out-of-camera you have less work to do to get the greatest image since sliced bread – and isn’t that what choosing a camera is all about? When you choose to tweak you can do even better, which is the incredible potential for growth the D300 brings to the DSLR user.

So is the D300 a PRO camera or prosumer model? Nikon calls it a new PRO model and certainly when you add the MB-D10 grip the combo displaces the current Nikon Pro D2x in just about every way. That comparison makes it very fair to call the D300 a Pro model. On the other hand the D300 also obsoletes the D200 prosumer model in almost every way and it only costs a little more than the D200 it replaces.

In the final assessment you are forced to conclude the D300 is a very expensive prosumer camera AND a very reasonable PRO model. The street price for the body has been around $1800.  Every other prosumer model – the Canon 40D, Olympus E3, Sony A700, and Pentax K20D sell for a street price range of a little less (E3) to the new $1000 price of the 40D with the current Canon Instant Rebate.

We prefer to view the Nikon D300 as the biggest bargain around in a true PRO camera. There is little to want from the D3 with a D300/MB-D10 combo except a full-size sensor and ISO sensitivity to 25,600 instead of the merely spectacular ISO 6400 of the D300. They clearly share the same breakout technology and features. The D300 is also so good it is very hard to recommend buying any other more expensive crop-sensor pro model. That leaves the PRO level competition above the D300 with two full-frame sensor models from Nikon and Canon, at least until the Canon 5D MkII and Sony A900 launch later this year.

Canon or Sony or Olympus/Panasonic or Pentax/Samsung will likely shock us all in the next round of camera introductions. If they do I will be the first to applaud their accomplishments. But from where I sit right now they clearly have their work cut out for them.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • haplo602 - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    Nice blog. Finaly you have seen the Nikon(tm) light :-)

    I had a brief chance to try out the D3 a few weeks ago and I have to say that if D300 is only 50% of the D3, it's the best camera for a reasonable price.

    But personaly I'd go Pentax K20 if I where shopping for a DSLR entry system at this time. Best package for the price. Pentax flashes are expensive, but there is still Metz to help out in this field.

    Looking forward to your D300 review.
  • jpeyton - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    ...and he's not alone in his praise. Far from it, the D300 is hands-down the best reviewed, most award winning semi-professional camera on the market. There are numerous industry reviews if you want to know the details.

    A camera is a tool, not a status symbol, and right now the D300 is the best overall tool in its segment (and in many cases pushes the boundaries for a semi-professional camera).

    However, best overall does not mean best at everything. If you want in-body image stabilization, go with Olympus, Pentax or Sony. If you want compact telephoto lenses, go with Olympus and their 2x crop factor. If you want the most resolving power, go with Pentax and their 14MP sensor. If you want the best bang for your buck, get the Canon 40D (now under $1000).

    There are lots of arguments to be made about the pluses and minuses for each camera, but the D300 with its class-leading high-ISO performance, elegant 51-point auto-focus system, and borderline professional level speed and customization makes the most convincing argument to be at the top.

    Disclaimer: I'm a Nikon D300 owner, and former Canon 40D owner.
  • sprockkets - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    Do any of these DSLRs do what those Canon EOS film based camera had, that they could focus based on where you were looking in the viewfinder? Or are such features obsolete with the level of auto focus we have today?
  • pinto4402 - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    Generally, yes. I think Canon did away with the eye control focus feature on its DSLR line. The thumbwheel on the 40D, 5D, and 1D now controls the focus points. Having used both systems, I prefer the thumbwheel.
  • haplo602 - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    I never understood the need for that feature. It only comes into play in 2 cases:

    1. you have lot's of AF points
    2. your camera AF is unable to track moving objects properly across the viewfinder.

    Nikons have 1. but not 2. Anyway eye controlled focus required much calibration and it was dependant on factors you could not change (your eye :-)). It worked great for some people, it was a dissapointment for others.

    I think the Nikon Area AF logic is quite sufficient a replacement.
  • specialk - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    I'm not here to throw rocks but I do disagree a little.
    First off, I cant believe you guys loved the E-3 so much when its High ISO noise is horrendous compared to 40D, A700 & D300. There is a review of the 4 major prosumer models and I think they mentioned that the E-3's noise is comparable to entry level models; plus they showed crops of each camera from ISO 100-3200 and at 800, the picture was nearly unusable. This is simple physics due to the E-3's smaller sensor which means less light sensitivity. High ISO noise, or lack thereof, is arguably one of the most important aspects of a DSLR.
    Yes, the D300 is one helluva camera, but you posit that cost doesnt matter because the D300 is soo good. Obviously, I disagree because the D300 is $500-600(50%) more than the A700 and almost twice the 40D. For those that already have an established Brand assortment, these reviews dont really matter, but for those of us looking to enter the DSLR world, they do. The large price difference can buy a great Sony lens or a great Canon lens plus flash, which matters to us who are on a budget.
    Last 2 cents: I chose the A700 about a month ago after reading countless reviews on the bodies AND lenses mainly due to one reason: in-camera IS/VR. This simple feature will save me about $2000 over the next few years as I buy more lenses. Look at the Canon 70-200/2.8 IS & non-IS cost and then compare that to Tamron's & Sigma's similar offerings(800 vs 1600) and that is a huge savings due to not needing a lens with IS/VR built. I will inherently save 20-40% on lenses which will help me save for the A900. One more point: the A700 out-resolves the D300.
    BTW, thanks for your post and please spend more time reviewing DSLRs for AT.
  • jan3X5 - Sunday, June 1, 2008 - link

    "This is simple physics due to the E-3's smaller sensor which means less light sensitivity."

    Wrong. Very simple physics says that there is dependency between noise and physical size of cell ("pixel"). It means that higher count of pixels on same sensor size should mean higher noise. But this is still not whole truth, one cell is built from elements, primarily light-acceptors, signal ways and electrical circuits. Size of separate elements (and ratio between them) are different on most sensors. In last generation sensors, Oly uses "simple" trick (in real life this trick is pretty expensive) - they made light-acceptors bigger and signal and electrical ways smaller. In real, that means, that light-acceptors on 10 megapixel E-3 are same big as on 5 megapixel E-1 and the similar size as APS-C sensors with higher pixel count.

    Of course, this is still not whole truth, because technology of sensor is also important - Oly MOS works different than Canon/Sony MOS, in terms of dynamic range (altough the range is similar) it has stronger capabilities in darks and shadows but limited on highlights. Translated to noise, MOS used in E-3 have a bit more pronounced noise in darks and shadows and bit less on highlights. In real life, 40D, D300 and E-3 (I am not using A700) works excellent and very similar on ISO2000 eq., on ISO2500eq. and more is D300 the best one, but not in difference of class, on ISO3200eq. it is still much much less than 1 EV. What that means? In real life is E-3 very good low-light camera itself, but if you consider, that for similar price you get faster lenses on 4/3 than on APS-C (usually 1 stop faster), E-3 is not the worse, but one of leaders (if not best with top-profi lenses). You should not forget that you really need lens to shoot with DSLR ... (and you should not forget, that noise is popular question, but less noise itself never built better camera!)

    btw: I agree with original blog article, as body only D300 is probably the best universal choice in these days. But if somebody need guaranteed weatherproof and the very best lenses on the market, the E-3 should be better choice (and by me, it is my primary camera and system).
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - link

    Your reason for choosing the Sony A700 is certainly a valid one. I had a long conversation with Sony Marketing at PMA and discussed two of my major conerns with them in the hope they would correct the issues in the future.

    First of all, Sony has almost no motor lenses. Most of their kit and accessory lenses are screw-drive AF. As a result they are noisy and slower that Canon, Olympus, and Nikon. AF on the A700 is certainly fast, but it can also be very noisy depending on the lens.

    Even Pentax is releasing motor lenses in their DA* series. I was assured Sony would be addressing this in the near future. No motor lenses is OK for entry cameras, but I think it is not so OK for prosumer and the upcoming Pro "A900" or whatever it will be called.

    Second, the proprietary battery. I realize Sony is the world's largest battery maker, but if you are looking for a replacement battery for any of the new models - or extra for the grip - you will pay $50 to $70 for a battery ONLY available from Sony. I really dislike this coercion and said so to Sony. I doubt this will be fixed.

    By comparison, the D300 and 40D and 5D all use batteries that are readily available as quality generics from third-party sources. The generics cost $10 or less and not $60, and usually have even better specs than the manufacturer's battery.

    The sensor is the same in the Sony A700 as the Nikon D300, but the associated electronics are not. The Sony is certainly a very good camera but the lack of motor lenses is a big issue for many looking at a prosumer camera. It's an issue too few review sites even mention.
  • Deadtrees - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    D300 is such a feature packed camera and it really deserves in-depth review. How can you just say that this camera blows your mind without giving insights? Beside some of the problems (Mostly imaging problems that a true professional camera like this shouldn't have), the overall body-wise quality of D300 is amazing and it really deserves detailed reviews. Hell, as you mentioned it's a beast that's got 421 pages of manual. Don't you think you should talk about what are in some of those pages?

    If you want to do a review that you have been claiming, you should talk about features D300 provide and how they are useful in the field. Instead of what you claimed to do, you wrote a review that is just like the other reviews on the web only dumber.

    In other word, here at Anandtech, would you post a review of a new CPU that it only talks about a few basic things and claim it's the best!?
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - link

    This is a blog - an opinion piece - not a review. It is a report of what I am working on and what I am thinking at present. As soon as it falls from the top of the page you will find it under "What's New with Wes" blogs and not reviews.

    The D300 does deserve a full review and we are working on that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now