The CPUs

Centrino 2 launches with basically the same 45nm Penryn Core 2 Duos that have been shipping since the beginning of this year, the only difference is that these chips run off of a 1066MHz FSB (up from 800MHz in Santa Rosa Penryn). As far as we know there have been no architectural changes to the Montevina Penryn chips, they just have a faster FSB and do benefit, in some cases, from lower TDPs which we will explain later.


Centrino 2's 45nm CPUs remain largely unchanged from those that launched with the Santa Rosa Refresh earlier this year

The Centrino 2 launch lineup is below:

Montevina (Centrino 2) Clock Speed FSB L2 Cache TDP Pricing (1000 units)
Core 2 Extreme X9100 3.06GHz 1066MHz 6MB 44W $851
Core 2 Duo T9600 2.80GHz 1066MHz 6MB 35W $530
Core 2 Duo T9400 2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MB 35W $316
Core 2 Duo P9500 2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MB 25W $348
Core 2 Duo P8600 2.40GHz 1066MHz 3MB 25W $241
Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz 1066MHz 3MB 25W $209

Given that the only performance-impacting change here is the FSB speed bump, honestly there's no reason to expect a Centrino 2 with a T9400 to perform any differently from a Centrino Duo with a T9500. The 1066MHz FSB is nice, but will most likely only make a small difference with the upcoming Core 2 Extreme QX9300 - Intel's first quad-core mobile CPU, which isn't due out until later this year (2.53GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 12MB total L2 cache, 45W TDP).

The CPU pricing is actually even more aggressive than Santa Rosa Refresh Penryn parts, for comparison here are the older chips:

Santa Rosa Refresh (Centrino 1) Clock Speed FSB L2 Cache TDP Pricing (1000 units)
Core 2 Extreme X9000 2.80GHz 800MHz 6MB 44W $851
Core 2 Duo T9500 2.60GHz 800MHz 6MB 35W $530
Core 2 Duo T9300 2.50GHz 800MHz 6MB 35W $316
Core 2 Duo T8300 2.40GHz 800MHz 3MB 35W $241
Core 2 Duo T8100 2.10GHz 800MHz 3MB 35W $209

The new T9600 gives you an extra 200MHz at the same price, while the P8600 and P8400 give you virtually the same performance, but lower TDPs at the same price. The new 25W TDPs are particularly interesting since they drop power consumption at the same clock speeds and are available in speeds up to 2.53GHz.

The entire Core 2 mobile lineup with the new Montevina chips is below:

Core Platform Clock Speed FSB L2 Cache TDP Package
Core 2 Extreme X9100 45nm Penryn Montevina 3.06GHz 1066MHz 6MB 44W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Extreme X9000 45nm Penryn Santa Rosa Refresh 2.80GHz 800MHz 6MB 44W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Extreme X7900 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.80GHz 800MHz 4MB 45W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Extreme X7800 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.60GHz 800MHz 4MB 45W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T9600 45nm Penryn Montevina 2.80GHz 1066MHz 6MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T9400 45nm Penryn Montevina 2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo P9500 45nm Penryn Montevina 2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MB 25W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo P8600 45nm Penryn Montevina 2.40GHz 1066MHz 3MB 25W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo P8400 45nm Penryn Montevina 2.26GHz 1066MHz 3MB 25W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T9500 45nm Penryn Santa Rosa Refresh 2.60GHz 800MHz 6MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T9300 45nm Penryn Santa Rosa Refresh 2.50GHz 800MHz 6MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T8300 45nm Penryn Santa Rosa Refresh 2.40GHz 800MHz 3MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T8100 45nm Penryn Santa Rosa Refresh 2.10GHz 800MHz 3MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T7800 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.60GHz 800MHz 4MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T7700 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.40GHz 800MHz 4MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T7500 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.20GHz 800MHz 4MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Core 2 Duo T7300 65nm Merom Santa Rosa 2.00GHz 800MHz 4MB 35W 35mm x 35mm
Index The Lowest Power Core 2 Centrino, Ever
Comments Locked

12 Comments

View All Comments

  • Penryn123 - Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - link

    Will new 25W CPUs also work in Santa Rosa boards? (drop-in replacement possible?)
  • Visual - Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - link

    Shame on Intel for the crappy launch... and the whole lot of hype and noise about the "new platform" seems out of place to me, seeing as it is simply more of the same old.

    The new integrated GPU is really the only big change to me, but I already have very low expectations for it. Nothing unusual, we're already used to Intel's GPUs being inferior to nVidia/ATI. Shame that the "platform" requires an Intel chipset.
    The dynamic switching between discrete and integrated GPU has potential, but then again it may be completely useless if the discrete GPUs are able to tune down their power drain when used only for 2D or Aero.

    I'm not too excited about detailed specs or performance numbers of the platform itself - "it's good enough" and "it's better than the old one" is all most people need to know and understand really.
    I am much more interested in knowing what new things the OEMs are cooking. Will we finally get some decent GPU in a tablet, will we get multi-touch screens, will we get something like AMD's idea of 16x pci-express connector for external GPUs, etc... all things that are quite unrelated to Intel and the new platform launch - they have been possible all along with the old platform and I'm a bit disappointed they are still being delayed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now