Graphics Performance

Moving on to gaming performance, AMD has upgraded their integrated graphics within Strix Point to the RDNA 3.5 architecture. RDNA 3.5 improves things over RDNA 3 within Phoenix and Hawk Point in multiple areas. One thing RDNA 3.5 does is greatly increase the GPU's capacity to execute complicated graphics operations more effectively by optimizing key things such as texture sampling and interpolation. Upgrading the memory management in RDNA 3.5 also allows for better overall power optimization and data handling to address major GPU performance issues.


Screenshot of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with Radeon 890M in GPU-Z

All of the improvements and upgrades over RDNA 3 should theoretically translate into better real-world gaming performance. Generally, any form of mobile SoC doesn't quite bring the power or graphics compute to the same level as discrete graphics, which have more die area to play with, a higher transistor budget at the manufacturing level, and more power.

As the new AMD Radeon 890M graphics is the direct successor to the Radeon 780M, it does have an obvious competitor in the previous Phoenix and Hawk Point mobile SoCs. Until Intel launches its upcoming Lunar Lake mobile SoC, the other competitor is Intel's current Meteor Lake-based Arc Xe LPG integrated graphics. Another contender is AMD's own RDNA 3.5 sibling to the Radeon 890M in the Ryzen AI 9 HX pairing, which is the Radeon 880M and is found in the Ryzen AI 9 365. The main difference between the Radeon 890M and the 880M is in the number of graphic cores or compute units (CUs). The Radeon 890M features 16 x CUs, while the Radeon 880M comes with 12 x CUs.

As integrated graphics get their memory from the primary pool of DRAM installed, slower system memory can be hindered by bandwidth. AMD's Ryzen AI 300 series allows for both DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500, which is what the ASUS Zenbook S 16 we're testing uses.

For this review, we will focus on gaming performance at 1080p, which is the most commonly used gaming resolution according to the latest Steam survey. Given that these are mobile chips, we've opted for middle-of-the-road settings using the Medium preset. Despite the advancements in integrated graphics, they still lack the horsepower of discrete graphics.

Gaming Performance @ 1080p Medium Settings

IGP Company of Heroes - 1080p Medium - Average FPS

IGP Company of Heroes - 1080p Medium - 95th Percentile

IGP Cyberpunk 2077 - 1080p Medium - Average FPS

IGP Cyberpunk 2077 - 1080p Medium - 95th Percentile

IGP F1 2023 1080p Medium, Bahrain - Average FPS

IGP F1 2023 1080p Medium, Bahrain - 95th Percentile

IGP Returnal, 1080p Medium - Average FPS

IGP Returnal, 1080p Medium - 95th Percentile

IGP Total War Warhammer 3, 1080p Medium - Average FPS

IGP Total War Warhammer 3, 1080p Medium - 95th Percentile

Looking at the performance of the Radeon 890M within the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, we can see that the combination of Zen 5/Zen 5c cores and the latest RDNA 3.5 graphics performs consistently well at 1080p. Given the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a higher core count with 12C/24T (4 x Z5 + 8 x Z5c) compared to the Ryzen 9 7940HS (8C/16T), the latest Soc also has a higher number of graphics compute units (16 CUs vs. 12 CUs). On top of that, you also have to factor in the jump in CPU architecture to Zen 5 over Zen 4; the latest SoC certainly does have an advantage.

In Company of Heroes 3 at medium settings, this game can simultaneously be very taxing on the CPU cores and graphics. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with the Radeon 890M graphics is around 23% faster than the Ryzen 9 7940HS/Radeon 780M, although to make things a level playing field, we are testing the 7940HS at 35 W. 

We also see good gains over the Ryzen 9 7940HS and Intel's Core Ultra 7 155H, which is a 6P+8E/22T chip with their Arc Xe integrated graphics that has 8 x CUs in Cyberpunk 2022 and F1 2023, but we are also seeing an uptick of 38% compared to the Core Ultra 7 155H in Returnal; for contrast, it beats the Ryzen 7940HS by around 57%.

Overall, AMD's latest RDNA 3.5 graphics architecture and the Zen 5 pairing certainly improve integrated graphics performance. This is a good thing, although integrated graphics are still not quite there when it comes to achieving a consistent 1080p/60fps in demanding titles. Games such as MOBAs, including League of Legends and DOTA 2, and other less demanding games will certainly play well on this iGPU.

AI Performance Conclusion
Comments Locked

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • GeoffreyA - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    I hope the mobile cores' having 256-bit SIMDs doesn't mean the APUs are going to also?
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    By APUs I assume you mean the desktop G series chips. In which case, historically those have used the same die as the mobile parts. So the short answer is "most likely yes, they'll have 256-bit SIMDs".
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    Yes, that's what I thought. A bit of a disappointment, that.
  • Khanan - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    Why, if you need full fledged AVX512 you can get the proper CPUs for that, people that do usually buy those anyway. The APU variant can still do AVX512 however, just not in one take cycle.
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    Good point. The thing is, apart from any power cost, it would be beneficial in a lot of places, considering that AVX-512 is being used more and more: dav1d, SVT-AV1, x265, and other places. Certainly, those who are doing heavy-duty work will buy the desktop CPUs; but if full-width AVX-512 can filter down to the lower parts, it will benefit many. And some folk, not interested in a discrete GPU, will buy an APU anyway.
  • Khanan - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    I mean AMD still got you covered if you buy the desktop version, “not APU” it still has a small igpu in it, that’s plenty if you’re not gaming. And if you’re gaming the APUs aren’t much anyway. I think all in all the decision of AMD to save space and only give “proper” AVX512 to the usual desktop CPUs is fine, considering those who really need it will buy those or even higher parts anyway. What should be considered still, is the fact that it was saved in the APU/Laptop CPU because of economic reasons. You want full AVX512 there? Fine, chip would be bigger and thus CPUs pricier + bigger sizes reduces the amount of CPUs you can produce from single wafers = less CPUs overall = more pricing possibly = less availability. I think AMD did the right thing, Intel doesn’t even give you AVX512 in general. I mean you want AVX512? You still at least get the “light” version of it, it’s not like you’re not getting it at all, right m.
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    No, I agree. It's better than not having it, as on Intel, and I suppose it's just greed talking. What completely slipped my mind is that the ordinary "non-APUs" also come with graphics these days. So, my mistake there, and it changes the whole argument. In light of that, it makes more sense.
  • Khanan - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    Absolutely no problem, that’s why we are having these talks!
  • id4andrei - Sunday, July 28, 2024 - link

    What is the delta between on battery performance and plugged in?

    How is the battery drain under sleep?
  • abufrejoval - Monday, July 29, 2024 - link

    In one review I've seen, with the 28 Watt profile there was hardly any drop with the battery and I'd expect the "standard" and "whisper" profiles won't change any either. The 33 Watt "performance" mode most likely will default to something more 25 Watts without external power.

    Twelve hours of sleep brought 4% battery drop in the same review.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now