AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X & 7970X Review: Revived HEDT Brings More Cores of Zen 4
by Gavin Bonshor on November 20, 2023 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
- AMD
- HEDT
- ThreadRipper
- Zen 4
- Threadripper 7000
- TRX50
TR 7000 vs. Intel: Encoding
One of the interesting elements of modern processors is encoding performance. This covers two main areas: encryption/decryption for secure data transfer and video transcoding from one video format to another.
In the encrypt/decrypt scenario, how data is transferred and by what mechanism is pertinent to on-the-fly encryption of sensitive data - a process by which more modern devices are leaning towards for improving software security.
We've updated our list of encoding benchmarks for our 2024 CPU suite to include some of the most relevant and recent codecs, such as AV1, HEVC, and VP9. Not only this, but we have also included FLAC audio encoding as well as WebP2 image encoding into the mix to show not only how the latest processors perform with these codecs but also to show discrepancies in performance throughout the different segments.
We are using DDR5-5200 RDIMM memory on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and 7970X as per JEDEC specifications. For Intel's Xeon W9-3495X, we are using DDR5-4800 RDIMM memory as per Intel's JEDEC specifications. It should be noted that both platforms are run with their full allocation of memory channels, eg, TR7000 in 4-channel and Sapphire Rapids in 8-channel.
Below are the settings we have used for each platform:
- DDR5-5200 RDIMM - AMD Threadripper 7000
- DDR5-4800 RDIMM - Intel Xeon Sapphire Rapids WS
- DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 14th Gen
- DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
Starting with the WebP2 Image encoding tests, the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X and 7970X perform well compared to the other chips we've tested. Interestingly, in the SVT AV1 encoding using the fastest preset, the desktop chips with the faster core frequencies win. The tables turn using the mid preset, with both Threadripper 7000 chips sitting on top of the charts.
In the SVT-HEVC benchmark, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X sits at the top of the list, and the same is prevalent in the VP9 encoding benchmark. In the FFmpeg 6.0 benchmark with x264 and x265, the desktop processors with the faster cores win in this situation, with the Core i9-14900K and the 6.0 GHz boost core frequencies playing a bigger hand than simply having more cores.
Looking at 7-Zip performance, both the Threadripper 7980X and 7970X are vastly superior to the Intel Xeon W9-3475X and the flagship desktop chips, including the Core i9-14900K, Ryzen 9 7950X, and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
66 Comments
View All Comments
JRF68 - Tuesday, December 12, 2023 - link
FYI the Xeon W3300 series (Icelake), introduced 3rd quarter 2021, has 8 channel memory. However the secondhand market for the W3300 is atrocious. On eBay prices for a W3365 are 1200 USD, and that's for a QS sample. The required motherboard from SuperMicro, X12SPA-TF C621A LGA4189 on eBay, are asking 12-1500 USD. So ya, skip it and go new W3400 series, that's what I'm in the process of doing.SanX - Wednesday, November 29, 2023 - link
AVX512 shows 5 times, 8 times, even 10+ times speedup. Can anyone on the planet show me any real app, not the test no one saw the source code, which benefited from AVX512 even by the factor 2-3 ?Frank_M - Tuesday, December 5, 2023 - link
Waves Plug-ins for DAW's.R
Mathematica
Pretty much anything that uses the Intel Math Kernel Library.
SanX - Tuesday, December 12, 2023 - link
And the speedup there is? 10%Frank_M - Tuesday, December 5, 2023 - link
Enjoyed the stats.It would be interesting to read some articles on what would be the best hardware configs to run tensor Flow, One API, and/or GNU Scientific assuming a budget of $5000.
SanX - Wednesday, December 13, 2023 - link
Are Anandtech's Ian Cutress AVX2 and AVX512 codes available for users testing? Are source codes available? On how many cores they work, all or just one?