ASUS 1S Workstation Boards (AMD and Intel)

The final ASUS products we were shown were from a new group at ASUS, targeting single socket workstation motherboards. The advent of dual core and forthcoming quad core CPUs will change the workstation market at least for the short term. You will soon be able to, in a single socket, achieve a level of processing power never before thought possible without going to a much more expensive workstation or sometimes server motherboard.

ASUS had two such 1S workstation boards on hand, one using AMD's Socket-AM2 and one supporting Intel's Conroe and Kentsfield processors:

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

The major difference between these motherboards and their desktop counterparts is the inclusion of PCI-X slots, but otherwise you've basically got 1S desktop motherboards.

ASUS' Concept Motherboard DFI's NF590 SLI and RD580 Socket-AM2 Motherboards
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • phusg - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Debug code readout - Been on numerous boards for quite some time. Asus just made it viewable from outside the case.


    No, transparent side windows already did that ;-)
  • OCedHrt - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    So what happened to ASRock boards (supposedly page 18)?
  • bongobear - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    I'd like to see what ASRock have lined up as well, however the mini-ITX Albatron boards that were shown in their place were a nice surprise. If they can tweak those a little and get them out at a nice price, very tempting....
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    Anand has a ton of pictures and information from his trip, so he'll probably provide a second update later. However, I've updated the page links to correctly reflect the Albatron content on page 17.
  • Stele - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    quote:

    ...in that they are not standard electrolytic capacitors filled with liquid. All of the capacitors [...] use a solid chemical compound designed to better withstand higher temperatures, thus preventing leaking or other capacitor related failures.


    There are actually two major types, one (the more common) being filled with solid compound as noted, and are simply called solid electrolytic, or solid aluminium electrolytic capacitors. The other type uses non-solid electrolyte. Both types are better than the usual electrolytic capacitors of course in terms of resistance to high temperatures - generally around 1,500-3,000 hours at 105°C-125°C. Another useful characteristic is that they perform well in high-frequency, high-capacitance applications, which is one reason they've often been used on graphics cards, for example.

    They are however not immune from leaking and other capacitor related failures... it's just that they can survive prolonged exposure to higher temperatures for longer periods of time than the regular electrolytic capacitors before they too fail.

    quote:

    Gigabyte still only offers a 3-year warranty on this board, despite the technically more reliable capacitors.


    This, unfortunately, is non sequitur i.e. it does not follow. Component choice is but one of so many factors in determining the stability, performance and reliability of a product. A cheapo backyard manufacturer could boast 16-phase power, all-Nichicon/Rubycon solid electrolytic caps, Philips MOSFETs and AMP connectors all around but would still fail if the circuits were designed by a half-baked engineer fresh out of college and poorly manufactured. Of course, it could be used by the said cheapo manufacturer as a gimmick to fleece the gullible consumers (of which unfortunately there are very many) who rocket to seventh heaven on seeing such big names. Or a not-so-cheapo manufacturer could make their product more attractive by using such flash while cutting corners on areas where consumers probably won't notice in perhaps the first 6 months of use.

    Speaking of gimmick, as mentioned above these capacitors are more useful in high-frequency, high-temperature applications. Naturally not every single circuit nor square inch of a motherboard would call for them and hence the extra cost of 100% solid electrolytic capacitors is unnecessary - they cost in the order of 3-5 times that of regular electrolytic caps, and when added up the savings could certainly be better used elsewhere on the board. For now, at least, other than the circuitries that really could benefit from the solid electrolytic capacitors, I would agree with the other manufacturers that indiscriminate plastering of the board with them is rather more marketing gimmick than engineering.
  • Viditor - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    Anand/Jarred...I have a few questions if you get time.

    1. How is the RAS functionality for Woodcrest with the Asus server board?
    2. Do the FBDIMMs require active cooling, and if so how much?
    3. When Asus released the A8N32-SLI, they hinted at releasing more boards with the 8 phase power...have/will they?
    4. Any chance on finding out what the functionality is for the 1207 pins on Socket F?

    Cheers! And thanks for the article...!
  • bob4432 - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    after all this time and the floppy still lives on ...... ;)
  • Calin - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    Floppy is still the only way to load certain drivers for hard drive controllers in Windows (during installation). And as long as this will be the case, the floppy will live on
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    Fortunately, this problem goes away with Vista. I'm hoping that in a couple of motherboard revs, those damn things will go away.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, June 6, 2006 - link

    I linked in higher res images for some of the more interesting photos Anand took. If you would like to see any others in more detail, let me know (via email) and I will see about adding those. Note that some images are left in "lo-def" because it reduces blurriness. :)

    Take care,
    Jarred Walton
    Editor
    AnandTech.com

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now