The Xiaomi 11T & 11T Pro Review: Two Chips, With a Battery Focus
by Andrei Frumusanu on September 15, 2021 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Mobile
- Smartphones
- Xiaomi
- Xiaomi 11T
- Xiaomi 11T Pro
Conclusion & End Remarks
Today’s review was little smaller in scope, notably missing some things such as display evaluation (it’s good), or cameras, however we got the visit the core aspects of the two Xiaomi 11T devices.
The two phones are fundamentally the same, but also couldn’t be any more different in terms of their conclusions;
In terms of design, the devices do market themselves as more budget friendly options compared to the Mi 11. The compromises that were made in design is a blockier form-factor, notably exchanging a curved screen with a lower-resolution flat one, although 120Hz is still there. The build quality of the phones is still good, but not reaching the level of ergonomics we’ve seen on the Mi 11. It’s also in general a larger footprint phone, wider than the Mi 11.
In terms of performance, both phones are good. The 11T Pro, virtue of the Snapdragon 888, is quite snappier and more responsive than the 11T with the MediaTek Dimensity 1200. There are some questionable performance abnormalities for the phones. The 11T Pro handicaps the X1 cores of the Snapdragon quite a bit, and it ends up being unused in a lot of scenarios, notably such as web browsing. The 11T has weird scheduling which also tends to affect its performance to below that of what we expect from the D1200 chip.
On the GPU side, these are the most misbehaving Xiaomi phones to date. In actual gaming titles, performance is ok and thermals are excellent, but Xiaomi only does so in a very opaque manner as there’s very misleading benchmark performance and thermal throttling settings (there’s no throttling!).
Update September 22nd: Following our updated battery test results on the new 11T firmware, we’ve updated the conclusion of the article to better reflect the evaluation of the device.
In terms of battery life, both the 11T and the 11T Pro represent extremely good longevities. Although the SoCs are different, and there are some slight efficiency differences between them, what’s actually more important for the phones is that both devices have optimised platform and display power characteristics that are generally better than other 2021 devices, including Xiaomi’s own other Mi 11 series flagship devices.
Fast-charging has been a PR centre-point for the phones, particularly the 120W 11T Pro. Yes, it’s the fastest charging device on the market, however we are unconvinced of the claims that it doesn’t impact battery longevity. We’ll address the topic in a dedicated article soon, but it’s shocking at how misleading the companies have become in this regard.
The 11T starts at 499€, which really puts the phone at the high end of the mid-tier price category. Thanks to its adequate performance, long battery life, and reasonable compromises, it represents a good value package. The only thing that I would say would have sealed the deal more would be the inclusion of OIS on the main camera, an aspect where both 11T phones still notably struggle behind the Mi 11 or Mi 11i.
The 11T Pro starts at 649€ - it’s a much better device, but its pricing isn’t quite as aggressive as what I had expected from Xiaomi. For only around 50€ more, you can get the Mi 11, which has a much nicer screen, better camera, and although you lose a bit on battery life, it’s a very hard choice to make. There is also the Mi 11i, a phone that is essentially identical to the 11T Pro and comes in at 599€. Xiaomi here is its own toughest competitor in terms of price and value, so I wonder why they felt the need to make the 11T Pro, besides for showcasing 120W charging.
Out of both devices, the 11T Pro is a bit weird because it overlaps so much to Xiaomi’s other phones. The pricing and value of the 11T is something that is able to differentiate itself more, and is a more good overall value package that might interest users.
41 Comments
View All Comments
mingogomes - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
Hey Andrei,On your battery test of PCMark, can you tell me what brightness settings you were using?
Max, 50% or low?
Thanks
5j3rul3 - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
Hope there's more info and review about those extremely fast cahrge system, such as:Oppo
125W / 65W
40W / 30W WL
vivo (iQOO)
120W / 55W / 44W
50W WL
Xiaomi (RedMi, POCO, Blackshark) 120W / 67W / 65W / 50W
80W / 67W / 50W WL
Lenovo
100W
RedMagic
100W / 55W
Qualcomm
100W
HUAWEI
66W / 40W
66W / 40W / 27W WL
RealMe
65W
50W WL
5j3rul3 - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
Adjustment:OnePlus
65W
50W WL
Honor
100W / 66W
50W WL
RedMagic
120W / 100W
ASUS
65W
5j3rul3 - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
Is there any Mi 11T series' camera review?Or just wait iPhone 13 and other smartphones to have a 21H2 smartphone cam battle?
Andrei Frumusanu - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
I didn't have time to do camera, in general expect lacklustre results worse than the Mi 11.Wereweeb - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
IMO a 108MP camera that gets binned down to 27MP is no better than a 48MP camera that gets binned down to 12MP (8.3MP for 4K image + EIS margin). Massive waste of sensor area.(And no, it's not for 8K photo/video, that would require a sensor that gets resolved to at least 33MP)
Plumplum - Monday, September 20, 2021 - link
It's nona-binning...108MP to 12MP...With binning, pixel's size is 2.1microns (3x0.7)
On 48MP, pixel's size is 1.6microns (2x0.8)
Light received by pixel is (2.1/1.6)^2=1.72.
Pixels received +72% light compared to 48MP
I use 50MP IMX766 on Nord 2. Binned Pixel's size is 2.0microns...in low light conditions, it has nothing to do with most 48MP sensors.
Lack of OIS is the weakness on these devices, not sensor.
pfactor - Wednesday, September 15, 2021 - link
From the label, it looks like this charger only achieves 120w output when it is connected to a 220~240V AC supply. (Otherwise, the max output at when connected to 120V AC is only 96W) Was this tested in the US or in Europe?The output rating on the label should be a true output rating, and not a measurement of input power consumed.
ArcadeEngineer - Thursday, September 16, 2021 - link
Andrei lives in Luxembourg, so 230v.Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, September 16, 2021 - link
I measured 115W on the AC side.