Testing Results, Maximum Fan Speed (12 Volts)

Starting things off, let's take a look at the NH-U12S Redux performance with the fans at their full speed (12 V).

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Max Fan Speed)

Noctua claims that the NH-U12S Redux can perform just as well as the more advanced (and expensive) NH-U12S, just at the expense of higher noise. Our thermal testing reveals that this claim is true, as the NH-U12S Redux does perform almost identically compared to the NH-U12S. The thermal performance of the NH-U12S Redux is just a little worse than the NH-U12S without the addition of the extra NA-FK1 fan. Adding the NA-FK1 fan makes the NH-U12S Redux a little bit better than the NH-U12S but the actual performance difference is very small.

Fan Speed (12 Volts)

Noise level

When it comes to acoustics, Noctua’s statement regarding the amount of noise generated by the NH-U12S Redux is also true. The NH-U12S Redux is noticeably louder than the NH-U12S – though not by much. With its fan running at maximum speed, the noise output of the cooler is not too high at all. Meanwhile, adding the second fan increases the noise output of the NH-U12S Redux a bit more.

Testing Results, Low Fan Speed (7 Volts)

Switching things up a bit, let's next take a look at cooler performance with the NH-U12S Redux fans taken down to 7 Volts.

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Low Fan Speed)

With the speed of its fans reduced down to about 620 RPM, the NH-U12S Redux still performs almost just as well as the NH-U12S. The addition of the NA-FK1 fan here does make a difference, improving the thermal performance of the NH-U12S Redux significantly and pushing it close to the significantly larger NH-U12A.

Fan Speed (7 Volts)

Noise level

Both the NH-U12S Redux and the vanilla NH-U12S are practically dead silent under these operating conditions. The NH-U12S Redux has a noise output 1.6 dB(A) higher than that of the NH-U12S, which is technically a significant difference due to the logarithmic scale, yet on an absolute basis, 32.1 dB(A) is very low and you'd really need to focus to notice that kind of noise in a quiet room. The addition of the second fan makes the NH-U12S Redux more noticeable, but 33.8 dB(A) are very comfortable for everyday use.

Thermal Resistance VS Sound Pressure Level

During our thermal resistance vs. sound pressure level test, we maintain a steady 100W thermal load and assess the overall performance of the coolers by taking multiple temperature and sound pressure level readings within the operating range of the stock cooling fans. The result is a graph that depicts the absolute thermal resistance of the cooler in comparison to the noise generated. For both the sound pressure level and absolute thermal resistance readings, lower figures are better.

In the above chart, we can discern that the NH-U12S is indeed better than the NH-U12S Redux when both the thermal performance and acoustics are taken into account. The NH-U12S Redux does offer great overall performance though, rivaling even that of the NH-U12A under certain conditions where the fan of the latter becomes too noisy for the thermal performance the cooler offers. We can also see that the addition of the second fan makes the NH-U12S Redux capable of reaching slightly lower thermal resistance figures, though always at the disproportionate expense of noise.

Testing Methodology Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Wednesday, August 25, 2021 - link

    Their redux fans are a bit cheaper and louder than the ones they normally pack with the coolers.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, August 25, 2021 - link

    ‘beautifully designed and made, with the perfectly arranged fins and heatpipes creating a work of art.’

    I’ll call the Louvre.
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, August 25, 2021 - link

    Or maybe just call it the Louver. 🙄
  • AnnonymousCoward - Wednesday, August 25, 2021 - link

    Love the Thermal Resistance vs Sound graph.

    I've been using the NH-U14S for 6 years. I love Noctua quality and honestly don't care what it costs, it's worth it.
  • vegemeister - Wednesday, August 25, 2021 - link

    It's a pity that that y'all don't have the historical data to put other coolers on the R_th vs SPL chart. Every remotely modern fan has PWM control now, and for the ones that don't, motherboards have variable-voltage drive of 3-pin fans. Nobody is bridging their fans between the 12V and 5V supplies anymore.
  • meacupla - Thursday, August 26, 2021 - link

    I get the feeling that, if you are looking to buy an aftermarket heatsink, you should buy the best one.

    You can reuse the heatsink when you upgrade, and a really good one will handle higher wattages just fine.
  • Wrs - Thursday, August 26, 2021 - link

    Though there is no best, I mostly agree, provided the manufacturer is stable and provides long-term support for new sockets. An air cooler should last decades. Stock CPU coolers should go the way of in-box charging bricks; they waste money.
  • damianrobertjones - Thursday, August 26, 2021 - link

    So... lower cost unit usually means that the higher priced items become more expensive. Top, middle and bottom etc. Nice move, Noctua.
  • ZolaIII - Thursday, August 26, 2021 - link

    Meh Noctua isn't really competitive in this segment and probably never will be. My recommendation if you need a plane 4 heat pipe tower cooler (mainstream as it can get) is Artic Freezer 34 CO for some 38$ no cut corners there regarding mont brickets or thermal paste and a blower just a tad worser that best Noctua Industrial (server) ones. On the other hand regular Freezer 34 with standard PO fan (still better than Redux one's) is just 30$.
  • Spunjji - Friday, August 27, 2021 - link

    That does look like a bargain, and I've always had good experiences with their products. Cheers for the tip!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now