First Place: ATI TV Wonder Elite

For just about a year now, we've been hearing about ATI's Theater 550 chip, the successor to the highly successful Theater 200 used in the eHome Wonder.  The Theater 550 was a bit of a let down in that it seemed a lot like a new release of old technology. What we wanted to see was a hardware MPEG-4 encoder from ATI and what we got instead was the promise of the best hardware MPEG-2 encoder ever.  Although it's not the promise we wanted, ATI did deliver exactly what they set out to do. 

The most noticeable feature of the TV Wonder Elite was that all of the text box issues, which we saw in the competing cards, were gone. 


A clean picture and note that there are no issues around the text boxes.


You can't get totally sharp text off of a SD signal, but you get text that's very legible and artifact-free with the TV Wonder Elite.

Upon closer investigation, the image quality of the TV Wonder Elite is better in many little ways compared to the competition here.  The color reproduction is much more true. There are much lower levels of noise and you can even see detail in actors on the screen.  Compared to the second place Hauppauge card, the differences are much more subtle, but in back-to-back comparisons, you do notice differences between the two cards.  The Hauppauge does appear to have higher levels of color saturation, but the TV Wonder Elite seems to produce a more "correct" image. 

ATI TV Wonder Elite

Hauppauge WinTV PVR-250


Ignoring the differences in border colors (the video feed in the center is still the same), the TV Wonder Elite offers more accurate color reproduction.

As slight as those differences may be, given the price parity between the Hauppauge and the TV Wonder Elite, we give the nod to ATI here. 

What the TV Wonder Elite doesn't do, however, is the type of improvement in image quality that ATI's marketing material would have you believe; the biggest reason being that SD cable signals are simply not good enough for those types of improvements to be seen.  The TV Wonder Elite isn't perfect, while it is still susceptible to the quality of your cable feed, but out of the competitors here, it's as good as it gets. 


ATI's Remote Wonder Plus (left) vs. a standard MCE remote (right)

The retail TV Wonder Elite ships with ATI's new Remote Wonder Plus, a much improved remote control design over previous ATI remotes.  Unfortunately, the Remote Wonder Plus will not function as a MCE remote. You'll still have to shell out the $30 for one of those if you're building a MCE machine. 

Although we have specifically decided not to focus on software bundles (given that the premise of this roundup is finding a TV tuner card for a MCE system), ATI does ship the TV Wonder Elite with a copy of CyberLink's PowerCinema with an ATI skin.  At first glance, the ATI Edition of PowerCinema looks a lot like a red version of the MCE interface. However, as soon as you start to use it, you realize its shortcomings.  The interface is extremely slow to respond compared to MCE and it still features no integrated program guide, which renders it useless as a serious PVR tool by today's standards.  As a standalone TV tuner, the TV Wonder Elite's bundle leaves much to be desired, but as a companion to Windows XP Media Center Edition, ATI has released the best quality tuner on the market from what we've seen. 

The biggest drawback of ATI's TV Wonder Elite is its price point - between $140 and $160, the TV Wonder Elite is ridiculously expensive for a SD TV tuner. But if you want the best, it's your only option.

Second Place: Hauppauge WinTV PVR-250 Final Words
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • vailr - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    ATI’s TV Wonder Elite vs. eVGA's NVTV vs. Hauppauge PVR-150MCE
    http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q2/tuner-com...
  • Patman2099 - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    I got a Theatrix 550, its got a theatre 550 chip, but its made by sapphire. its listed at about half the price of the ATI card reviewed. Looks exactly the same too.

    I love it, works flawlessly in my HTPC
  • LX - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Disappointed.

    Lots of fluff, less information.
    Where is the software compatibility tests?
    Where is the comparison of the MPEG-2 encoding?

    Incorrect statements like:
    "For example, the WinTV PVR-250 is identical to the PVR-500, although the latter has two tuners. The PVR-250 is also identical to the PVR-250MCE and the PVR-350."

    Check http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/compare_pvr.html

    Anand is getting sloppy.
  • segagenesis - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    #37 - Yep. Ive seen piles of them at CompUSA. Not readily available... maybe in Neverland. Seeing how it IS readily available I would still count it as fair game :P
  • sonicDivx - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    hey, Cygni. Just checked Newegg, guess what PVR-150 instock

    http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?desc...

    mind you this is the retail version. Also the 150 has been out for some time. I've even seen it at CompUsa.

    Also check out pcalchemy their prices are good. Also I trust HTPCNews or AVSForums more in terms on product reviews and knowledge on HTPC systems.

  • GoatMonkey - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Why is there a sudden interest in reviewing these products just 2 weeks after I make my decision and buy something? I searched everywhere I could think of to find any information about these cards. I finally decided on a Hauppauge 500, which I'm happy with btw, but it's still annoying to get a decent review just *after* I buy something.

    Next up you should do a comparison of the software side of this: Beyond TV, Myth TV, Windows MCE, Chris TV, etc. How about a comparison of video capture and editing software also. I guess Anand's reviews mostly software, but maybe some other site will pick up this idea. I'm having a great time with Beyond TV btw.

  • bupkus - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    kjohnson,
    Perhaps you'd be happier in Red China where ideology police WATCH YOU!
  • leaglebob2 - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    How can you do a video review and post captured pictures without stating what the capture parameters were? ((of the video stream--not the stills))

    BTW==what were they?

    And assumng capturing was done "at the best settings" how about a review at the lower resolutions for those of us who record talk shows?

    You did all that work, and then stopped short.

    Thanks///bobbo.
  • Tiorapatea - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    Oops, sorry, triple post.
  • Tiorapatea - Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - link

    "That all changed when Microsoft released Windows XP Media Center Edition. Bringing the first true 10-foot UI to the PC..."

    Whilst I don't generally like to nitpick too much, I do find the lack of attention given on this site to Linux solutions a bit puzzling. Linux is really not that hard to get going, particularly for enthusiasts. And Anandtech does, I believe, aim to cater for the enthusiast.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now