Gaming Tests: Final Fantasy XIV

Despite being one number less than Final Fantasy 15, because FF14 is a massively-multiplayer online title, there are always yearly update packages which give the opportunity for graphical updates too. In 2019, FFXIV launched its Shadowbringers expansion, and an official standalone benchmark was released at the same time for users to understand what level of performance they could expect. Much like the FF15 benchmark we’ve been using for a while, this test is a long 7-minute scene of simulated gameplay within the title. There are a number of interesting graphical features, and it certainly looks more like a 2019 title than a 2010 release, which is when FF14 first came out.

With this being a standalone benchmark, we do not have to worry about updates, and the idea for these sort of tests for end-users is to keep the code base consistent. For our testing suite, we are using the following settings:

  • 768p Minimum, 1440p Minimum, 4K Minimum, 1080p Maximum

As with the other benchmarks, we do as many runs until 10 minutes per resolution/setting combination has passed, and then take averages. Realistically, because of the length of this test, this equates to two runs per setting.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS

 

As the resolution increases, the 11900K seemed to get a better average frame rate, but with the quality increased, it falls back down again, coming behind the older Intel CPUs.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Gaming Tests: Deus Ex Mankind Divided Gaming Tests: Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

541 Comments

View All Comments

  • rfxcasey - Friday, March 19, 2021 - link

    Yeah, might have to agree with you on this, from what I've seen the new instructions are amazing. They might be a real game changer but one thing is certain, it's the way of the future.
  • Sgtkeebler - Wednesday, March 24, 2021 - link

    Should I buy this or the i9-10900k. I have an i7-9700k but I want to blow my stimulus because I have a pto cash out coming in may
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, March 27, 2021 - link

    If wasting money excites you...
  • Priogeth - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 - link

    Gesaz what is all this nonesense about?
    here some values:
    (Name; Speed%*; mem; 1core; 2core; 4core; 8core; 64core; Price; )
    11400F: 97.6%; 84pts; 159pts; 313pts; 594pts; 930pts; 1127pts; 200€;
    7 3700x: 86%; 78pts; 135pts; 267pts; 508pts; 918pts; 1404pts; 264€;
    7 5800x: 98%; 87pts; 157pts; 312pts; 589pts; 1062pts; 1637pts; 380€
    9 5900x: 101% 89pts; 159pts, 314pts; 602pts; 1167pts; 2347pts; 500€
    11700k: 107%; 87pts; 180pts; 358pts; 679pts; 1206pts; 1681pts; 350€

    (100% speed performance = i9-9900k)
    the values are from userbenchmark dot com, and can be checked your selves.
    you might also want to go and check how these values come together b4 making any statements!

    in comperison with these values you can clearly see that the i7-11700k is the top runner! not only in gaming but also in number crushing.
    tho i would still more than recomend the ryzen9 5900x/5950x or a threadripper if you realy depend in numbercrushing like renderings and such.

    also worth mentioning is the I7-11400F if youre on a budget. best gaming cpu for that price.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now