GIGABYTE B560M DS3H AC & B560M DS3H

Representing a more modest pair of micro-ATX options from GIGABYTE is the B560M DS3H AC and B560M DS3H. The only difference between both models is that the B560M DS3H AC includes a Realtek Wi-Fi 5 CNVi, whereas the regular B560M DS3H does not. Both models follow the same design, with a black, grey and deeper grey patterned PCB, withblack power delivery and chipset heatsinks. GIGABYTE is advertising a direct 6+2 phase power delivery, which is using a single 8-pin 12 V ATX CPU power input.


The GIGABYTE B560M DS3H AC motherboard and B560M DS3H share the same design

Located in the center of the board is one full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, with two PCIe 3.0 x1 slots below it. For storage, GIGABYTE includes two M.2 slots, including one with support for PCIe 4.0 x4 drives,a second slot that can accommodate both PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA drives, with six SATA ports; two with right-angledand four with straight-angled connectors. In the top right-hand corner is four memory slots, with support for up to 128 GB of DDR4 memory, although GIGABYTE hasn't currently given us its memory QVLlist.


GIGABYTE B560M DS3H AC rear panel (only difference is Wi-Fi)

On the rear panel, the GIGABYTE B560M DS3H AC includes an AzureWave RTL8821CE Wi-Fi 5 CNVi, which is the only difference between both models. Both models include one USB 3.2 G1 Type-C, three USB 3.2 G1 Type-A, and two USB 2.0 ports. GIGABYTE includes a pair of video outputs including a DisplayPort and HDMI, with three 3.5 mm audio jacks powered by a non-specified Realtek HD audio codec. Finishing off the rear panel is a single Realtek Gigabit Ethernet port, with a PS/2 combo port designed for use with legacy peripherals.

GIGABYTE B560M Aorus Pro AX & B560M Aorus Pro GIGABYTE B560M D3H
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • Flunk - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Still limiting overclocking on mid-range boards even though the competition doesn't? Shame Intel, shame.
  • shabby - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Do you really need to overclock though? Don't these cpus overclock themselves to 200w+ anyway?
  • Linustechtips12#6900xt - Thursday, April 8, 2021 - link

    just adjust the turbo limit time or enable MCE if you can, at least i think you can on b560 not sure and 2933/3000 mhz memory isnt the biggest deal either
  • Great_Scott - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    The most recent crop of Intel CPUs 1) overclock on their own, and 2) don't have any thermal headroom.

    Really, getting a Non-K with a B-series motherboard and saving the money for (any) GPU is the better idea...
  • Martin84a - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Not that the work isn't appreciated, but I think you should just hire raisonjohn and call it a day. His work on a massive comparison spreadsheet for the AMD A, B and X motherboard is amazing, and light years ahead of anything I've seen.
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wmsTYK9Z3-...
  • Tomatotech - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Decent stack range, but the vast majority have too many SATA and not enough m.2 and not enough USB type C ports. In the next few years there will be more and more type C equipment to plug in.

    Apart from that, most of them are good for final DDR4 boards as a final home for DDR4 RAM as DDR 5 starts coming in next year (or the year after).

    With AMD’s reduction in CPU power the way seems open for some low power desktops to run entirely off USB-C with its power supply of up to 100w (delivered via DC so equal to a wall supply of maybe 130w AC as the transformer losses are in the wall wart not in the desktop PSU). That could mean smaller and cheaper desktops, powered straight from the monitor (if it has a USBC power supply) through the USBC video cable. Apple already has this setup though a few hoops need to be jumped through.
  • DanNeely - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Limited m.2 is mostly down to being mATX and budget. The smaller board size combined with m.2 being attached to the board itself doesn't leave much room for a 2nd slot unless you go with some sort of riser setup. And using a riser crashes into being budget products.

    USB-C rollout has been strangled by the decision to implement reversibility by adding an extra chip between the physical port and controller whose job is to swap the IO around instead of offloading that to the controller. Adding an extra dollar or two to the BOM per port has resulted in all the board makers deciding that not having multiple C ports is a good way to cut costs.

    Lastly, mATX is going to be the last place we see SATA numbers shrink as long as Intel keep offering them on their chipsets. The plugs are dirt cheap, and unless you're building a maxed out full ATX board the chipset has more IO lanes than you can use. If numbers ever start dropping below what's offered in the chipset it'll either be on mITX boards that are badly space constrained or full ATX ones where the designers decide a few more PCIe lanes or USB3 ports would be more valuable.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Plenty of AMD micro ATX boards have 2 slots, you just need some intelligent board design. Hell they can fit 2 on mini ITX without riser boards.
  • Tomatotech - Tuesday, March 30, 2021 - link

    Thanks Dan for the reply. I didn’t know that info about the USB-C extra chip causing issues. USB-IF strikes again!
  • vailr - Monday, March 29, 2021 - link

    Gigabyte also has the (full size ATX board) B460 HD3:
    https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/B460-HD3-rev-...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now