OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold

OCZ has developed quite a reputation in the past year with the introduction of many leading-edge memory products. As you will see in a look at our ongoing memory benchmarks, the results have been that OCZ owns many of the top performance spots in our memory tests. Even with that kind of reputation, OCZ VX must be counted a unique product. The EL label is used by OCZ for Extreme Latency, but VX is a new label used to refer to Voltage eXtreme memory. VX means that the memory is designed for and can handle very high memory voltages for expanded performance.

The first OCZ VX memory was rated at a very conservative PC3200 2-3-3-8 at a standard 2.6V. While it met these specifications, the specs hardly described a memory that was widely recognized as capable of DDR500 and higher at 2-2-2 timings using voltages of 3.0V and higher. As yields and binning improved, OCZ decided in late February to introduce an updated VX memory - now rated at DDR500 2-2-2 at 3.3V.

The new DDR500 2-2-2 uses the same chips as the earlier VX, but it is binned for higher speed and verified at the new DDR500 specifications. OCZ tells us that everything about the new VX memory is basically the same as earlier PC3200VX, but with even better chips becoming available for VX, it was time for the higher speed rating. OCZ will also be introducing a VX value memory in the future for those enthusiasts that want 2-2-2 timings, but do not demand DDR500+ timings for 2-2-2. Gold VX modules are optimized for use on Athlon 64 based motherboards. In addition, OCZ EL PC-4000 Gold VX is rated to handle up to 3.5V without invalidating the OCZ lifetime warranty.


The new VX DDR500 uses the familiar OCZ Gold heatspreaders. OCZ describes the heatspreaders as gold-mirrored copper, and DDR500 VX is only available as a 1GB kit with two 512MB double-sided memory modules. We removed the heatspreader and found the memory chips were labeled OCZ. OCZ apparently buys memory chip blanks and relabels them for VX. OCZ is usually very open about chip sources, but in this case, they would only comment that the memory chips were made to their specifications and went through extensive binning at OCZ. Forums are claiming that the blank is a new Winbond memory chip.

The recently tested DFI LANParty nForce4 boards are the only current production boards to fully support the voltages required by VX memory. It is fortunate that the DFI are also excellent performers and the DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR was the recent winner of our Gold Editors Choice in the nForce4 SLI roundup. The DFI boards are only recently available, however, and prior to the DFIs, there were two ways to use VX memory. First, some enthusiasts modified their boards to supply higher memory voltage.


Second, you could use VX with an OCZ DDR Booster, which is a device designed to fit into the DIMM slot of most motherboards.


The DDR Booster is a little $40 device that allows the user to select voltages up to 3.9V regardless of what voltages the motherboard supports. This neatly gets around the fact that most motherboards supply only 2.7V to 2.85V to the memory slots. For motherboards other than the DFI, you can even buy a bundle of VX memory with the DDR booster.

OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold Specifications

 OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold Memory Specifications
Number of DIMMs & Banks 2 DS
DIMM Size
Total Memory
512 MB
Rated Timings 2-2-2-8 at DDR500 at 3.3V
2-3-3-8 at DDR400 at 2.6V
(Typically 2-2-2-8 at DDR400 at 3.0V)
SPD (Auto) Timings 3-3-3-8
Rated Voltage 3.3V

With Intel's introduction last summer of the Intel 915/925X chipsets with support for DDR2 memory, the primary market for DDR memory has become the excellent AMD Athlon 64 platform. However, some 915 boards also support DDR, and the continuing Intel Socket 478 also supports DDR memory. It is worth noting that OCZ designed PC4000VX for the AMD platform and it is optimized for the Athlon 64 platform. In addition, the only unmodified motherboard for VX is the DFI nForce4 motherboards. For these reasons, OCZ EL PC4000 VX Gold was only tested on the DFI LANParty nF4 SLI-DR Athlon 64 Socket 939 test bed.

Index Performance Test Configuration
Comments Locked

67 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    #26 - You need to take a close look at DDR400 2-2-2 VX vs. DDR400 2-2-2 with any other ram we have tested. The biggest news with VX is how fast the chips are at the same speed and timings compared to other chips, which we talked about in the article. There IS a difference in performance from DDR400 2-2-2 to DDR533 2-2-2 at the same clock speed but it is smaller than many imagine as I pointed out in the review. We have set up our AMD tests to really measure the impact of memory - removing as many other variables as possible.
  • Beenthere - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    Sorry but I don't see any justification for over-voltage RAM as the system performance increase is marginal at best. The cost doesn't justify the minimal gains. In addition more voltage = more heat, any way you slice it. This is more marketing hype and no measurable system performance increase as we've seen before from OCZ. Between OCZ and "DFI's gullible PC enthusiast product line", I'm sure they are laughing all the way to the bank. PT Barnum was correct...
  • ChiefNutz - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    The Article said that fourm rumors said the chips were built by winbond. I Though winbond left the memory market? anyone know any different??
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    Obviously the RTCW-ET results with VX at 2-3-2 are 116.7 with 61.77 vs. 119.3 with 71.80. This compares to our previous fastest 2-2-2 DDR400 at 110.8. We really do need the ability to correct in the comments section :-)
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    #15 - I did test with 61.77 to make sure the results were not too skewed by the newer 71.80 driver. Q3 and RTCW are slower with 61.77 but this is offset by the memroy bandwidth scores being higher. I just quickly ran 61.77 at 2-3-2-6 and 2,.6v since that was your greatest interest. Q3-554.1 (vs. 567.4), RTCW-ET-116.7 (vs.199.3), Sandra UNbuffered-2949 (vs.2927). The 61.77 results at 2-3-2 are still significantly higher than any 2-2-2 results at 400.

    #17 - In our launch review we clearly showed the MSI Neo2 to be the same performance as nF4. We have also shown in the past that AGP and PCIe using the same card are the same performance. Since the MSI does not support these extreme voltages we had to make some changes to test VX - which we detailed in the review.

    I realize many of you do not want to believe that a memory running 2-3-2 can outperform another memory running 2-2-2 at the same speed, but this is not unique to VX. It is just that VX is an extreme example of a chip being faster at the same speed. Go back to benchmarks that included BH5 and you will see it is faster than TCCD at the same speed and timings.
  • LX - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    Another typo: "OCZ LANParty nForce4"
    Hey, Anand, let Wesley have some sleep between reviews!
  • chr6 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    typo on last page, its enhanced bandwidth not extended, if i remember correctly.
  • chr6 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

  • EddNog - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    "Pwned."

    No, really...

    "Pwned."
  • Rocket321 - Friday, March 4, 2005 - link

    Now that you wont need all that extra ocz platinum r2, feel free to send some my way ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now