ASRock Z590 Pro4

The ASRock Z590 Pro 4 is another entry-level series for users, specifically focusing on basic features and aesthetics. For those that don't care too much for gaming-specific features, the Z590 Pro 4 still has plenty going for it. It uses a black and silver printed PCB, with a pair of silver heatsinks cooling an advertised 14-phase power delivery, and an RGB enabled chipset heatsink.

The feature set is a pair of full-length PCIe slots, with the top slot operating at PCIe 4.0 x16 and the second slot electronically locked to PCIe 3.0 x4, with three additional PCIe 3.0 x1 slots. Memory support includes DDR4-4800, with a maximum capacity of up to 128 GB across four available memory slots. There are three M.2 slots in total for storage, including one PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 and two PCIe 3.0 x4/SATA M.2 slots, with six SATA ports for more conventional SATA based drives. The SATA slots are split up into two sections, with four right-angled ports and two straight angled ports, with all of them including support for RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10 arrays.

The ASRock Z590 Pro4 omits any Wi-Fi connectivity, but it does include an unspecified 2.5 GbE controller powering one RJ45 port. It also lacks Type-C connectivity, with just two USB 3.2 G2 Type-A, two USB 3.2 G1 Type-A, and two USB 2.0 ports. It includes a pair of video outputs for integrated graphics, including DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI, with an older Realtek ALC897 HD audio codec powering three 3.5 mm audio jacks. Finishing off the rear panel is a PS/2 keyboard and mouse combo port.

At the time of writing, ASRock hasn't shared details on its Z590 pricing.

ASRock Z590 Steel Legend & Steel Legend Wi-Fi 6E ASRock Z590M Pro4
Comments Locked

88 Comments

View All Comments

  • Duncan Macdonald - Tuesday, January 19, 2021 - link

    Why so many motherboards for a product (Rocket Lake) that is outclassed before it is even available by the Zen 3 processors from AMD.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, January 19, 2021 - link

    Mindshare. Intel still means better FPS to some gamers. I also hear AMD’s CPUs are hard to get, except for the 5800x which some believe is overpriced. My local MicroCenter was out of all but that one. I just checked and it has exactly 1 in stock. That’s it for the entire line.
  • Deicidium369 - Wednesday, January 20, 2021 - link

    LOL - except it isn't - Zen 3 is nothing but more and more cache to cheese the synthetic benchmarks and impress the rubes. When you actually get a 5900X and a 5950X as I have you start to realize, that like the 6900XT - all AMD smoke and mirrors and little substance.

    Rocket Lake will wreck Zen 3 - and all the fanboyism won't change that - and one big plus for Rocket Lake is that it will be available in volume while TSMC scraps to get supplies - and Apple has priority - then AMD for the consoles - and whatever small crumbs that are left go to the AMD PC products. New microarch vs cache masquerading as a CPU - easy Intel win.
  • eva02langley - Wednesday, January 20, 2021 - link

    LMAO ROXXORMYBOXXOR

    Just look at how stupid it sounds... you sound like this.

    1. ES of Rocket Lake are showing REGRESSION in performances even in games.
    2. It passes from 10 cores to 8 cores.
    3. The prices are still the same... way overpriced compared to AMD...
    4. AMD is looking like it will retain the performances crown in ST and MT performances.
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, January 20, 2021 - link

    "Rocket Lake will wreck Zen 3"
    Mate, Intel's own leaked benches are already disproving that. You're bending language so hard here that apparently a maximum 5% performance advantage in cherry-picked games at 1080p = "wrecked", and that's at nearly 1/2 the performance per watt.

    It's amusing to see how literally all of the Intel shills across multiple sites have switched to banging on about stock levels. Do you have a secret site where you coordinate this, or do you just copy each other naturally? 🤣
  • Makaveli - Wednesday, January 20, 2021 - link

    lol man this thread is pulling out all the weirdo's tonight.

    We got that guy stuck in 2008 and intel fan boys...
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, January 22, 2021 - link

    Thanks for spamming the topic with your insipid arrogance.
  • gsuburban - Wednesday, April 14, 2021 - link

    Lots of folks are looking for the 4th gen NVMe speeds. Also, they are getting more USB 3 and USB C ports that many of the newer cases come with located up front. Also, for those that don't need a video card, the 11th gen CPU's, the upper level ones, support HDMI 2.0 vs. HDMI 1.4 and have a different graphics chip, the UHD750. Other than these, there are not many other benefits however, cost wise at this time, its the same cost to spend on last years hardware so it seems more reasonable to buy this years hardware for the same price. It wouldn't be much value to take a 3 year old system and upgrade to this years hardware as the gains are not worth the cost.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, January 19, 2021 - link

    Does running a display via Thunderbolt add latency?
  • croc - Tuesday, January 19, 2021 - link

    The issue I see here is that Intel's first foray into PCIe 4.0 seems designed to meet, not exceed AMD's efforts. If you are behind the competition, then just meeting their specs is not the way to get ahead. Then there is Rocket Lake's max core count. Max of eight, due to the backporting of the 10nm Sunny Cove cores onto the 14nm litho. OK, AMD's 16 cores may be a bit overkill (for gaming) given the lack of PCIe lanes on their AM4 socket, but Intel is replacing a CPU that topped out at 10 cores with a CPU only allowing eight...

    Can't wait for the return of Gelsinger's return. I predict a large ship turning around at speed. Watch out for bow waves....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now