Battery Performance

Our general method for battery testing is to reset the camera to its default settings and change the recording mode to the highest quality option. Then, we take 5 pictures without the flash and 2 pictures with the flash until the battery is dead. For more information on our battery test, please refer to our Testing Procedures page. For the Pentax Optio S40 and the Nikon Coolpix 4100, we used our pair of NiMH Power2000 2500mAh batteries. For the other cameras, we used the included battery packs. All batteries were fully drained before charging for the test.

Number of shots taken in one battery charge
Casio EX-Z40 1,767
Pentax S40 1,236
Nikon 4100 1,315
Canon SD300 1,028
Olympus Verve 400

The Canon SD300 comes with a NB-4L Li-ion battery pack (3.7V 760 mAh). In our test, it took a very impressive 1,028 frames on a single charge. Although the SD300 does not last as long as some of the competition, you can certainly count on it lasting throughout a day or two of heavy shooting. An extra battery pack can be found for ~$40.

Playback Features The Timing Tests
POST A COMMENT

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • hoppa - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    The SD300 is an awesome camera, but some note should be made of the very obvious artifacting in the resolution tests. The Canon may display slightly higher resolution than the Nikon, but that comes at a cost: the oversharping causes extreme moire and artifacting issues in very fine detail.

    Thank you for finally reviewing a top notch camera though!
    Reply
  • IceWindius - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    Meh, no thanks, I love my new A85 just fine and dandy. Reply
  • stephencaston - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    AtaStrumf, thanks for the suggestion. Its always sort of tricky finding something suitable for video samples. Believe it or not, sometimes its really hard to find something interesting to shoot. I'll venture more into the downtown scene next time ;-) Reply
  • AtaStrumf - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    OK, read the review. Fabulous camera! A friend of mine has a Canon PS ELPH SD110 (3MP, 2x zoom)

    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_...

    Also a nice camera, but the small lens size makes *S*Purple fringing (check spelling in your conclusion) a real pain in the you-know-where (not neck ;-). It shows up big and often, although SD300 seems to be a bit better.

    One complaint: a bad movie sample. Shoot something more interesting next time and not so far away and detailed (it really gets blurred-lost), because I don't think anybody will be making IMAX type of movies with it. Show a stroll along the beach, kids playing, fish, cats something close up, colorfull and moving.

    Reply
  • AtaStrumf - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    Oh yea, I forgot to stress that the new stuff (lens and CCD sensor) are _THE_ most important features that can single-handedly make or break a camera.

    And just for those who don't know it yet: IXUS=ELPH (EU/US).

    And........, yep I think that's it.
    Reply
  • AtaStrumf - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    Haven't read the review yet but I gotta say this right now anyway, because I just saw the pricetag on this IXUS and I already know it's not for me.

    Just today I was thinking that next time you guys put up a review I gotta ask you to review a Canon PowerShot A510 and/or A520. It may seem just like a A75/A85 in a new form factor, which I suppose it is, but it also has a new lens and there is some confusion about wheather or not both A510 and A520 use the same CCD sensor, so I'd really like to see a review before I buy, but I just can't find any, which is really odd, considering it looks like just the right combination of features and price, which should make it extremely popular choice.

    Please, please, please review this camera.

    Sorry about the stupid long sentence, but I think it conveys very well exactly what I wanted to say.
    Reply
  • PrinceGaz - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    Whew, that seems like the sort of camera I'll get if I fancy something better than my Minolta DiMAGE X20. Only downside I can see to the Canon is that it uses a proprietary battery rather than AA cells so I'd have to take the charger with me rather than simply taking a few sets of ready to use NiMH away with me, but I guess they couldn't have made the camera so small otherwise.

    Given the Canon's impressive movie capature ability, is there a limit to what size SD card the camera accepts? Will it take 1GB and the recently introduced 2GB SD cards? 640x480 @ 30fps MJPEG will eat the megabytes up pretty quickly, if the 320x240 @ 15fps MJPEG my camera can do is anything to go by.
    Reply
  • nels0360 - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    The SD300 is a great little camera. I bought one in December. It does have a couple of drawbacks though.

    In photos taken in low light, the photos occasionaly come out with a bright white "swirl" in the image. It is the flash refecting off of dust apparently. It is mentioned on the Canon website in the FAQ for this camera. This has ruined more than one of my photos.

    Also, as with many ultra-compacts, red-eye is a problem even with the red-eye reduction flash. There is just no avoiding it in some shots, but that is what Photoshop is for.

    If you get this camera, make sure to get the Canon leather case designed for it. It is incredibly small, comes in red or black and looks good to boot.
    Reply
  • ksherman - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    dont ell me we are russian into the Soviet jokes again...

    Great review, and a gret product! I defenitly want one of these suckas!
    Reply
  • Houdani - Wednesday, February 23, 2005 - link

    In Soviet Russia, Canons power shoot YOU! Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now