Resolving Fine Lines

For our resolution test, we reset the camera to its default settings and then used the highest resolution and quality setting. The camera was then set to +1.0 E.V, manual WB, and ISO 50. For more information, refer to our Testing Procedures page. When reading this chart, the numbers represent lines per picture height (LPH). For example, the number 16 would represent 1,600 LPH. Click on a crop to see the full chart at 100%.

Canon SD300 Nikon 4100 Olympus Verve

+1.0 EV

+1.3 EV

+1.0 EV
Click on images to download.

Canon SD300 VS. Nikon Coolpix 4100

Roll your mouse over the 200% crops below to see the difference between the Canon SD300 and the Nikon Coolpix 4100 resolution charts.


Hold mouse over image.


Hold mouse over image.


Canon SD300 VS. Olympus Stylus Verve

Roll your mouse over the 200% crops below to see the difference between the Canon SD300 and the Olympus Stylus Verve resolution charts.


Hold mouse over image.


Hold mouse over image.

The SD300 holds up very well in comparison to similar models. In the horizontal crops above, the SD300 is able to resolve lines out to 1,250 LPH, which is just a bit better than both the Nikon Coolpix 4100 and the Olympus Stylus Verve. All three cameras show some moiré near their resolution limits. Again, in the vertical crops, the SD300 has a slight advantage over the other two cameras by resolving fine lines out to 1,250 LPH. Canon has done a good job of not over-processing its images. This results in a smooth and clean resolution chart.

The Timing Tests Color Reproduction
POST A COMMENT

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • ElFenix - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    your title is funny

    best [class] camera in its class?

    =)

    nice review, otherwise. i really want a small camera for parties, etc. my S40 takes up too much space in my pocket, along with my cell phone.
    Reply
  • TrueWisdom - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    I'm of the opinion that the Casio EXILIM series are better cameras than these. I have the Z-55 and it's the speediest 5MP ultracompact I've come in contact with. I'd like to see Anandtech do a review of the Z-40, Z-50, Z-55, and the EX-S100 to see how they stack up. Reply
  • drwho9437 - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    Quasi review:

    I have an SD200 which is the same camera apart from the sensor, (3.2 instead of 4, save 100 dollars). Things to note about the SDX00 series (new 400, and 500 were introduced).

    Firstly, there are more CAs then the average digital (purple fringing), quite alot of it looks to be blooming (ie leakage charging). The lens is definatly soft in the corners, this seems to be the most distrubing when you have something with random high detail, ie tree branches, but not so bad when you have uniform high detail, say grass.

    These cameras are said not to have an aperture, instead, they are said to have a ND filter, to cut the light in half. There have been some comments that corner softness in lessed when the camera decides to shoot at a high "aperture" but I have not confired them. The camera itself does not display the shutter speed or aperture even in review mode so its difficult to do that test.

    On the flipside I did notice corner softness decrease as focal length increased (probably because that really works like an aperture, it uses just the center of the lens at tele), so if you want a really sharp picture of something standback and zoom in. (I never thought I'd say that).

    The video mode is good, but you'll need a fast SD card to do it at 640X480 30fps consistently. The one I have is borderline, and depends what I am taking it of, a little ! warns the buffer is getting full. However 320X240 modes always works for those really long videos at need, if your card ends up not being quite fast enough.

    So it is clear I got this camera, so that I would always have a camera with me, I have SLRs for the good stuff, I new about most of the issues I mentioned before I got it, most of them can be worked around.

    The highest prase I can give it is I didn't return it.
    Reply
  • Souka - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    I have a Canon S300 (over 3 years old...) and I'm looking to replace it.

    I really really like the S410, but once I saw the SD300 I was hooked, the DigiII chip speed rocks.

    Well alomst hooked.... The point of a camera is to take pictures....good pictures in my opinion.

    The SD300 does a good job, but the flare from flashes and the purple fringing are horrible. I've compared side-by-side shots of my S300 to the SD300. My old S300 takes MUCH better pictures despite 1/2 the resolution (and twice the weight and size!.....but if I wanted to enlarge a print...to lets say 8x10...the SD300 is better.

    I guess the S410 is my best option for now.... I'll live with the puny LCD and useless video mode....it's a camera damnit, not a vide camera.

    Anyhow.... maybe the SD310 will be better? (A guess)

    Cheers....

    Reply
  • stephencaston - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    #12, I agree with #14. Unless you really need the extra MP, I would go with the SD300 for its speed. If you really want a 5 MP ultra-compact, it might be worth waiting until the SD400 becomes available. Reply
  • R3MF - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    @ #6

    cheers, i didn't know that. :)
    Reply
  • tyipengr - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    Sorry for the blank post earlier...

    #12-

    I considered the same two cameras before ultimately purchasing the SD300. The speed of the Digic II, the vastly superior movie mode, and the 2-in. LCD got me at the end. I personally do not edit pictures very much so the extra 1-MP isn't as important to me. 4 MP is enough for 8x10s which is the largest I will ever blow up a pic.

    Reply
  • tyipengr - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    Reply
  • brownba - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    Stephen: I'm looking to buy a camera for my wedding this summer. I'm sure it'll be one of the canon elph's. The S500 is almost the same price as this SD300, which would you recommend? or just in general, which ultra-compact would you recommend? Reply
  • sxr7171 - Thursday, February 24, 2005 - link

    I have this camera and it probably is the top digital camera in its size class. There are some downsides to having such a small camera especially with regard to the purple fringing, and some of the graininess in night shots (due to the tiny photosensor), but it has some crazy attributes that make an amazing camera. One is the unreal speed of this thing. It is ready to take pictures within a second of turning on and it takes pictures with almost no delay at all when already powered on. It also has unreal battery life. I tested it once at home by taking 50% flash shots continuously in rapid-fire mode and it took over 1700 shots before the battery died. These things make it almost flawless for its main purpose - to take a bunch of casual pictures when on vacation without worrying about the battery dying and to get the shot you want without losing it while the camera is still trying to focus/turn on/bring the lens out etc.


    Does anyone know if there is a way to reduce the oversharping though? I'm not too happy about that. I know the Digital Rebel comes with sharpness set a little high by default but they allow you to reduce back to the EOS-10D/20D default levels.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now