Gaming Tests: Final Fantasy XIV

Despite being one number less than Final Fantasy 15, because FF14 is a massively-multiplayer online title, there are always yearly update packages which give the opportunity for graphical updates too. In 2019, FFXIV launched its Shadowbringers expansion, and an official standalone benchmark was released at the same time for users to understand what level of performance they could expect. Much like the FF15 benchmark we’ve been using for a while, this test is a long 7-minute scene of simulated gameplay within the title. There are a number of interesting graphical features, and it certainly looks more like a 2019 title than a 2010 release, which is when FF14 first came out.

With this being a standalone benchmark, we do not have to worry about updates, and the idea for these sort of tests for end-users is to keep the code base consistent. For our testing suite, we are using the following settings:

  • 768p Minimum, 1440p Minimum, 4K Minimum, 1080p Maximum

As with the other benchmarks, we do as many runs until 10 minutes per resolution/setting combination has passed, and then take averages. Realistically, because of the length of this test, this equates to two runs per setting.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Gaming Tests: Deus Ex Mankind Divided Gaming Tests: Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

339 Comments

View All Comments

  • Threska - Monday, November 16, 2020 - link

    Depends upon advantage.

    https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/11/16/nvidia-l...
  • FreckledTrout - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    AMD finally has an Intel beater on its hands at least until Rocket Lake arrives. Having actual competition is going to be great computing. Nice review.
  • duploxxx - Saturday, November 7, 2020 - link

    nothing confirmed on Rocket Lake...

    fishy results with a so-called avg turbo ghz which actually shows it was doing 5ghz.
    a total unknown release date, expected at the end of Q1 2021 on a dead platform with some kind of pcie-4 . yeah really looking forward.
  • Spunjji - Sunday, November 8, 2020 - link

    They'd have to get north of 5.3Ghz consistently to beat AMD.

    I just don't think they can, which would make the product pretty hilarious - big die, lots of heat, no performance crown.
  • hbsource - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Very impressive. I think I'm good with my 3950X until the next socket but the single thread uplift is very tempting.
  • FireSnake - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    @Ian:
    "With AMD taking the performance crown in almost area it’s competing in"
    Should this be:
    "With AMD taking the performance crown in almost every area it’s competing in" ... missing every?
  • charlesg - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Now to just find the 5950 in stock at NewEgg!
  • faizoff - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Quick question on encoding with Handbrake, the 4k encoding and even the others for that matter, what preset are they run? like fast, medium, slow? and what RF count are the encodes set to? Sorry if I missed those, don't see them at a glance. Amazing review as always. Best tech deep dive for me, I love to read the architectural breakdown.
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, November 9, 2020 - link

    I think AT is using Handbrake's presets: (a) Discord Nitro 480p30, (b) Vimeo YouTube 720p30, and (c) HEVC 2160p60. I went through them now and here are the settings:

    A) Medium, CRF = 21
    B) Medium, CRF = 22
    C) Slow, CRF = 24

    If you were looking for the reference frames, they are 3, 1, and 4. And there's a possibility Anandtech might have altered the presets.
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Does Purch require you to use at least one bad pun in every article?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now